Case Study on Instrumenting and Monitoring Geosynthetic-Reinforced Pile-Supported Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall Built over Soft Soil

MohammadAli Izadifar, Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh, Shengli Chen
{"title":"Case Study on Instrumenting and Monitoring Geosynthetic-Reinforced Pile-Supported Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall Built over Soft Soil","authors":"MohammadAli Izadifar, Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh, Shengli Chen","doi":"10.1177/03611981231224738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a case study on instrumenting, monitoring, and finite element modeling (FEM) of geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The GRPS-MSE wall was monitored using various instruments such as piezometers, earth pressure cells, shape-acceleration arrays (SAAs), and strain gauges. The performance criteria included efficacy, stress concentration ratio (SCR), differential settlement, and reinforcement tension. Collected data, such as excess pore-water pressures, contact pressures on pile and soft soil, differential settlements, and lateral displacement of MSE wall, were analyzed thoroughly. A 3D FEM was also developed to simulate the GRPS MSE wall, and the results are in good agreement with field data. The results demonstrated significant load transfer from soil to piles as a result of soil arching, yielding 30–32 SCR. The field efficacy was measured at 37.69 %, while the FEM efficacy was estimated as 42.4. Strains in geogrids within the geosynthetic-reinforced load transfer platform (GLTP) system were under 1%, less than the 5% maximum recommended by FHWA. The maximum differential settlement measured between pile cap and soft soil from SAAs is 7.1 mm, while it is estimated to be 8.3 mm from FEM. The MSE wall exhibited low lateral displacement (<25 mm), indicating enhanced stability because of GLTP. The comparison between five analytical GLTP design methods showed that the CUR226 methods gave the closest results to field measurements and FEM results. This study offers crucial insights into leveraging GLTP and MSE walls in highway construction.","PeriodicalId":509035,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"69 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231224738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a case study on instrumenting, monitoring, and finite element modeling (FEM) of geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The GRPS-MSE wall was monitored using various instruments such as piezometers, earth pressure cells, shape-acceleration arrays (SAAs), and strain gauges. The performance criteria included efficacy, stress concentration ratio (SCR), differential settlement, and reinforcement tension. Collected data, such as excess pore-water pressures, contact pressures on pile and soft soil, differential settlements, and lateral displacement of MSE wall, were analyzed thoroughly. A 3D FEM was also developed to simulate the GRPS MSE wall, and the results are in good agreement with field data. The results demonstrated significant load transfer from soil to piles as a result of soil arching, yielding 30–32 SCR. The field efficacy was measured at 37.69 %, while the FEM efficacy was estimated as 42.4. Strains in geogrids within the geosynthetic-reinforced load transfer platform (GLTP) system were under 1%, less than the 5% maximum recommended by FHWA. The maximum differential settlement measured between pile cap and soft soil from SAAs is 7.1 mm, while it is estimated to be 8.3 mm from FEM. The MSE wall exhibited low lateral displacement (<25 mm), indicating enhanced stability because of GLTP. The comparison between five analytical GLTP design methods showed that the CUR226 methods gave the closest results to field measurements and FEM results. This study offers crucial insights into leveraging GLTP and MSE walls in highway construction.
软土上建造的土工合成材料加固桩支撑机械稳定土墙的仪器和监测案例研究
本文介绍了一项关于土工合成材料加固桩支撑(GRPS)机械稳定土(MSE)墙的仪器、监测和有限元建模(FEM)的案例研究。使用压强计、土压力传感器、形状加速阵列(SAA)和应变仪等各种仪器对 GRPS-MSE 墙进行了监测。性能标准包括功效、应力集中率 (SCR)、差异沉降和加固拉力。对收集到的数据,如多余的孔隙水压力、桩与软土的接触压力、差异沉降和 MSE 墙的侧向位移进行了深入分析。此外,还开发了三维有限元模型来模拟 GRPS MSE 墙,结果与现场数据十分吻合。结果表明,由于土壤起拱,荷载从土壤大量转移到桩上,产生了 30-32 SCR。现场测量的功效为 37.69%,而有限元模型的功效估计为 42.4%。土工合成材料加固荷载转移平台(GLTP)系统内土工格栅的应变低于 1%,低于美国联邦公路和水利部建议的最大应变 5%。根据 SAA 测量,桩帽与软土之间的最大沉降差为 7.1 毫米,而根据有限元估算,沉降差为 8.3 毫米。MSE 墙的侧向位移较小(<25 毫米),表明 GLTP 增强了稳定性。对五种 GLTP 设计分析方法的比较表明,CUR226 方法的结果与现场测量和有限元分析结果最为接近。这项研究为在公路建设中充分利用 GLTP 和 MSE 墙体提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信