Globally inconsistent: Countries with top health indices erratic developmental hip dysplasia screening protocols

Natalie L Zusman, Pablo G Castañeda, Rachel Y Goldstein
{"title":"Globally inconsistent: Countries with top health indices erratic developmental hip dysplasia screening protocols","authors":"Natalie L Zusman, Pablo G Castañeda, Rachel Y Goldstein","doi":"10.1177/18632521241229978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developmental hip dysplasia is a prevalent pediatric musculoskeletal condition that lacks international standardized screening. We sought to characterize developmental hip dysplasia screening practices in countries with the top global health indices. We also explored diverse definitions in reported epidemiologic rates of this condition. We performed a scoping review of developmental hip dysplasia screening protocols utilizing countries ranked in the top 25 of the Bloomberg Global Health Index using a protocolized search strategy, progressing from academic to layperson sources. A reference was eligible for inclusion if it mentioned the countries’ screening program and developmental hip dysplasia was the pathology of concern. Incidence rates, when present, were also recorded. The United States Census Bureau’s International Database tool provided countries’ populations. We compiled the data and performed descriptive statistics and appropriate validation methods. Twenty countries (80%) had searchable screening programs. Clinical screening with selective universal screening was the most commonly observed (n = 16). Four countries had universal ultrasound screening: Switzerland, Austria, Germany, and Slovenia. Five countries did not have searchable programs. No countries employed radiographic screening. Incidence rates were expressly stated in the literature for nine countries; however, the cohort of interest varied from developmental hip dysplasia versus severity of developmental hip dysplasia versus miscellaneous (e.g. requiring hospitalization). The findings of this investigation highlight international inconsistencies regarding developmental hip dysplasia screening and epidemiologic data. Screening variations exist despite consensus statements calling for uniformity. We agree with prior literature advocating for increasing consistency in developmental hip dysplasia management or, at a minimum, increasing transparency regarding how we manage these young patients.","PeriodicalId":138259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","volume":"46 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521241229978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developmental hip dysplasia is a prevalent pediatric musculoskeletal condition that lacks international standardized screening. We sought to characterize developmental hip dysplasia screening practices in countries with the top global health indices. We also explored diverse definitions in reported epidemiologic rates of this condition. We performed a scoping review of developmental hip dysplasia screening protocols utilizing countries ranked in the top 25 of the Bloomberg Global Health Index using a protocolized search strategy, progressing from academic to layperson sources. A reference was eligible for inclusion if it mentioned the countries’ screening program and developmental hip dysplasia was the pathology of concern. Incidence rates, when present, were also recorded. The United States Census Bureau’s International Database tool provided countries’ populations. We compiled the data and performed descriptive statistics and appropriate validation methods. Twenty countries (80%) had searchable screening programs. Clinical screening with selective universal screening was the most commonly observed (n = 16). Four countries had universal ultrasound screening: Switzerland, Austria, Germany, and Slovenia. Five countries did not have searchable programs. No countries employed radiographic screening. Incidence rates were expressly stated in the literature for nine countries; however, the cohort of interest varied from developmental hip dysplasia versus severity of developmental hip dysplasia versus miscellaneous (e.g. requiring hospitalization). The findings of this investigation highlight international inconsistencies regarding developmental hip dysplasia screening and epidemiologic data. Screening variations exist despite consensus statements calling for uniformity. We agree with prior literature advocating for increasing consistency in developmental hip dysplasia management or, at a minimum, increasing transparency regarding how we manage these young patients.
全球不一致:健康指数最高的国家发育性髋关节发育不良筛查方案不稳定
发育性髋关节发育不良是一种常见的儿科肌肉骨骼疾病,但缺乏国际标准化筛查。我们试图了解全球健康指数最高的国家在发育性髋关节发育不良筛查方面的做法。我们还探讨了该疾病流行病学报告率的不同定义。我们采用规范化的检索策略,从学术来源到非专业来源,对彭博全球健康指数排名前 25 位的国家的发育性髋关节发育不良筛查方案进行了范围性综述。如果参考文献中提到了该国的筛查计划,且发育性髋关节发育不良是关注的病症,则符合纳入条件。如有发病率,也会记录在案。美国人口普查局的国际数据库工具提供了各国的人口数据。我们汇编了数据,并进行了描述性统计和适当的验证方法。20 个国家(80%)拥有可搜索的筛查计划。临床筛查和选择性普遍筛查是最常见的筛查方法(n = 16)。四个国家开展了普遍超声筛查:瑞士、奥地利、德国和斯洛文尼亚。五个国家没有可搜索的筛查计划。没有国家采用放射筛查。九个国家的文献中明确说明了发病率;然而,关注的人群却各不相同,有的是发育性髋关节发育不良,有的是发育性髋关节发育不良的严重程度,有的是其他疾病(如需要住院治疗)。这项调查的结果凸显了国际上关于发育性髋关节发育不良筛查和流行病学数据的不一致。尽管共识声明呼吁统一筛查标准,但筛查仍存在差异。我们同意以往文献的观点,即应加强发育性髋关节发育不良管理的一致性,或至少提高管理这些年轻患者的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信