Imaging of intracranial arterial disease: a comparison between MRI and unenhanced CT

C. Lucci, Ina Rissanen, R. Takx, A. G. van der Kolk, A. Harteveld, J. Dankbaar, Mirjam I. Geerlings, P. D. de Jong, J. Hendrikse
{"title":"Imaging of intracranial arterial disease: a comparison between MRI and unenhanced CT","authors":"C. Lucci, Ina Rissanen, R. Takx, A. G. van der Kolk, A. Harteveld, J. Dankbaar, Mirjam I. Geerlings, P. D. de Jong, J. Hendrikse","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2024.1338418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arterial calcifications on unenhanced CT scans and vessel wall lesions on MRI are often used interchangeably to portray intracranial arterial disease. However, the extent of pathology depicted with each technique is unclear. We investigated the presence and distribution of these two imaging findings in patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease.We analyzed CT and MRI data from 78 patients admitted for stroke or TIA at our institution. Vessel wall lesions were assessed on 7 T MRI sequences, while arterial calcifications were assessed on CT scans. The number of vessel wall lesions, severity of intracranial internal carotid artery (iICA) calcifications, and overall presence and distribution of the two imaging findings were visually assessed in the intracranial arteries.At least one vessel wall lesion or arterial calcification was assessed in 69 (88%) patients. Only the iICA and vertebral arteries (VA) showed a substantial number of both calcifications and vessel wall lesions. The other vessels showed almost exclusively vessel wall lesions. The number of vessel wall lesions was associated with the severity of iICA calcification (p = 0.013).The number of vessel wall lesions increases with the severity of iICA calcifications. Nonetheless, the distribution of vessel wall lesions on MRI and arterial calcifications on CT shows remarkable differences. These findings support the need for a combined approach to examine intracranial arterial disease.","PeriodicalId":507441,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Radiology","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2024.1338418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arterial calcifications on unenhanced CT scans and vessel wall lesions on MRI are often used interchangeably to portray intracranial arterial disease. However, the extent of pathology depicted with each technique is unclear. We investigated the presence and distribution of these two imaging findings in patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease.We analyzed CT and MRI data from 78 patients admitted for stroke or TIA at our institution. Vessel wall lesions were assessed on 7 T MRI sequences, while arterial calcifications were assessed on CT scans. The number of vessel wall lesions, severity of intracranial internal carotid artery (iICA) calcifications, and overall presence and distribution of the two imaging findings were visually assessed in the intracranial arteries.At least one vessel wall lesion or arterial calcification was assessed in 69 (88%) patients. Only the iICA and vertebral arteries (VA) showed a substantial number of both calcifications and vessel wall lesions. The other vessels showed almost exclusively vessel wall lesions. The number of vessel wall lesions was associated with the severity of iICA calcification (p = 0.013).The number of vessel wall lesions increases with the severity of iICA calcifications. Nonetheless, the distribution of vessel wall lesions on MRI and arterial calcifications on CT shows remarkable differences. These findings support the need for a combined approach to examine intracranial arterial disease.
颅内动脉疾病成像:核磁共振成像与非增强 CT 的比较
未增强 CT 扫描上的动脉钙化和核磁共振成像上的血管壁病变经常被交替用于描述颅内动脉疾病。然而,这两种技术所描述的病理范围尚不明确。我们分析了本院收治的 78 名中风或 TIA 患者的 CT 和 MRI 数据。血管壁病变通过 7 T 磁共振成像序列进行评估,动脉钙化则通过 CT 扫描进行评估。对颅内动脉的血管壁病变数量、颅内颈内动脉(iICA)钙化的严重程度以及两种成像结果的总体存在和分布情况进行了目测评估。只有 iICA 和椎动脉 (VA) 同时出现大量钙化和血管壁病变。其他血管几乎只显示血管壁病变。血管壁病变的数量与 iICA 钙化的严重程度有关(p = 0.013)。然而,核磁共振成像上血管壁病变的分布与 CT 上动脉钙化的分布显示出显著差异。这些研究结果支持了采用综合方法检查颅内动脉疾病的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信