First report in the fossil record of a shark tooth embedded in a pinniped bone

Stephen J. Godfrey, Paul Murdoch, Leonard Dewaele, Victor J. Perez, Clarence Schumaker
{"title":"First report in the fossil record of a shark tooth embedded in a pinniped bone","authors":"Stephen J. Godfrey, Paul Murdoch, Leonard Dewaele, Victor J. Perez, Clarence Schumaker","doi":"10.5852/cr-palevol2024v23a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are now many examples in the fossil record of shark bite marks preserved on biogenic materials including coprolites, ammonoids, sea star ossicles, an echinoid, and bone and calcified cartilage. These exceptional fossils document evidence of exploratory behavior, active predation, and/or scavenging. However, only a small subset report on the presence of shark teeth embedded in fossilized bone or cartilage. Although a few shark tooth-marked seal bones are known from the fossil record, no direct evidence of predation or scavenging in the form of a shark tooth embedded in a fossil seal bone has yet been documented. Herein, we describe the first shark tooth embedded in a seal (Phocidae Gray, 1821) bone, a calcaneum (CMM-V-6964), that was surface collected in Mosaic’s South Fort Meade Mine, Hardee County, Fort Meade, Florida, United States. The isolated bone originated from within the Bone Valley Member of the Peace River Formation (Hawthorn Group). The partial tooth is identified as having come from an Early Pliocene great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias (Linnaeus, 1758). This discovery also represents the first C. carcharias tooth ever found embedded in a fossil bone. The embedded tooth may have come about as a result of active predation or scavenging. The extant macropredatory sharks, Carcharodon carcharias (great white shark), Notorynchus cepedianus (Péron, 1807) (sevengill shark), Somniosus microcephalus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (the Greenland shark), and Somniosus antarcticus Whitley, 1939 (sleeper shark), are known to actively prey upon seals (Pinnipedia Illiger, 1811). If this peculiar fossil association resulted from active predation, the seal did not survive the encounter because there is no evidence of healing in the area around the embedded shark tooth.","PeriodicalId":506466,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus Palevol","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus Palevol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5852/cr-palevol2024v23a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are now many examples in the fossil record of shark bite marks preserved on biogenic materials including coprolites, ammonoids, sea star ossicles, an echinoid, and bone and calcified cartilage. These exceptional fossils document evidence of exploratory behavior, active predation, and/or scavenging. However, only a small subset report on the presence of shark teeth embedded in fossilized bone or cartilage. Although a few shark tooth-marked seal bones are known from the fossil record, no direct evidence of predation or scavenging in the form of a shark tooth embedded in a fossil seal bone has yet been documented. Herein, we describe the first shark tooth embedded in a seal (Phocidae Gray, 1821) bone, a calcaneum (CMM-V-6964), that was surface collected in Mosaic’s South Fort Meade Mine, Hardee County, Fort Meade, Florida, United States. The isolated bone originated from within the Bone Valley Member of the Peace River Formation (Hawthorn Group). The partial tooth is identified as having come from an Early Pliocene great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias (Linnaeus, 1758). This discovery also represents the first C. carcharias tooth ever found embedded in a fossil bone. The embedded tooth may have come about as a result of active predation or scavenging. The extant macropredatory sharks, Carcharodon carcharias (great white shark), Notorynchus cepedianus (Péron, 1807) (sevengill shark), Somniosus microcephalus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (the Greenland shark), and Somniosus antarcticus Whitley, 1939 (sleeper shark), are known to actively prey upon seals (Pinnipedia Illiger, 1811). If this peculiar fossil association resulted from active predation, the seal did not survive the encounter because there is no evidence of healing in the area around the embedded shark tooth.
化石记录中首次报告鲨鱼牙齿嵌在凤尾鱼骨中的情况
在化石记录中,现在有很多鲨鱼咬痕保存在生物材料上的例子,包括桡骨岩、氨蛋白、海星骨片、回声石、骨骼和钙化软骨。这些特殊的化石记录了鲨鱼的探索行为、主动捕食和/或清扫的证据。然而,只有一小部分化石报告了鲨鱼牙齿嵌入骨骼或软骨化石的情况。尽管化石记录中已知有一些带有鲨鱼牙齿标记的海豹骨骼,但还没有以鲨鱼牙齿嵌入海豹骨骼化石的形式记录捕食或食腐的直接证据。在本文中,我们描述了第一颗嵌入海豹(Phocidae Gray,1821 年)骨骼中的鲨鱼牙齿,这是一块小腿骨(CMM-V-6964),是在美国佛罗里达州哈迪县米德堡的莫赛克南米德堡矿区表面采集到的。这块孤立的骨头来自和平河地层(山楂组)的骨谷层。经鉴定,这部分牙齿来自上新世早期的大白鲨 Carcharodon carcharias(林尼厄斯,1758 年)。这一发现也是迄今为止发现的第一颗镶嵌在化石骨骼中的 C. carcharias 牙齿。嵌入的牙齿可能是主动捕食或食腐的结果。众所周知,现存的大型捕食鲨鱼--Carcharodon carcharias(大白鲨)、Notorynchus cepedianus(Péron,1807 年)(七鳃鲨)、Somniosus microcephalus(Bloch & Schneider,1801 年)(格陵兰鲨)和 Somniosus antarcticus Whitley,1939 年(睡鲨)--会主动捕食海豹(Pinnipedia Illiger,1811 年)。如果这种奇特的化石关联是由于主动捕食造成的,那么海豹在这次遭遇中并没有幸存下来,因为在嵌入的鲨鱼牙齿周围区域没有愈合的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信