Lars Qviller, Katharine Rose Dean, Mats Huserbråten, Ingrid Askeland Johnsen, Britt Bang Jensen
{"title":"Geographic redistribution of farmed salmonids reduces salmon lice infestations and treatment frequency in a simulation study","authors":"Lars Qviller, Katharine Rose Dean, Mats Huserbråten, Ingrid Askeland Johnsen, Britt Bang Jensen","doi":"10.3354/aei00473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Host density is a key driver in parasite population dynamics, and often the number of parasites increases rapidly with host density. In the context of Norwegian salmonid farming, this mechanism has led to a disparity between the desire to increase cultured salmonid production, and to reduce the negative effects of parasite infestations. Salmon lice infestations are detrimental to animal welfare due to salmon lice treatments and spillover from farms to wild salmonids. Here, we examine how a redistribution of the salmonid farm biomass may hamper exchanges of lice larvae between farms, and consequently reduce the salmon lice burdens and treatment frequencies. More specifically, we use a stochastic simulation model, fitted to empirical data from Norwegian aquaculture, to examine how lice abundances and treatments responded when the biomass in the system was distributed onto fewer, larger farms situated farther apart. To maintain realistic fish growth, seasonality and cohort development, lice population dynamics were simulated on top of historic production data from Norway. We simulated several scenarios, where an increasing number of farms were closed, and their biomass was redistributed to other farms with matching cohorts. The results indicate that fewer and larger farms reduce lice numbers and treatment frequency, and that a strategic removal of farms, based on their importance for connectivity in an oceanographic lice dispersal network, improves this effect. Some core mechanisms are highlighted that should be considered in regional production planning, and in the allocation of production concessions in salmonid farming.","PeriodicalId":8376,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture Environment Interactions","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Host density is a key driver in parasite population dynamics, and often the number of parasites increases rapidly with host density. In the context of Norwegian salmonid farming, this mechanism has led to a disparity between the desire to increase cultured salmonid production, and to reduce the negative effects of parasite infestations. Salmon lice infestations are detrimental to animal welfare due to salmon lice treatments and spillover from farms to wild salmonids. Here, we examine how a redistribution of the salmonid farm biomass may hamper exchanges of lice larvae between farms, and consequently reduce the salmon lice burdens and treatment frequencies. More specifically, we use a stochastic simulation model, fitted to empirical data from Norwegian aquaculture, to examine how lice abundances and treatments responded when the biomass in the system was distributed onto fewer, larger farms situated farther apart. To maintain realistic fish growth, seasonality and cohort development, lice population dynamics were simulated on top of historic production data from Norway. We simulated several scenarios, where an increasing number of farms were closed, and their biomass was redistributed to other farms with matching cohorts. The results indicate that fewer and larger farms reduce lice numbers and treatment frequency, and that a strategic removal of farms, based on their importance for connectivity in an oceanographic lice dispersal network, improves this effect. Some core mechanisms are highlighted that should be considered in regional production planning, and in the allocation of production concessions in salmonid farming.
期刊介绍:
AEI presents rigorously refereed and carefully selected Research Articles, Reviews and Notes, as well as Comments/Reply Comments (for details see MEPS 228:1), Theme Sections and Opinion Pieces. For details consult the Guidelines for Authors. Papers may be concerned with interactions between aquaculture and the environment from local to ecosystem scales, at all levels of organisation and investigation. Areas covered include:
-Pollution and nutrient inputs; bio-accumulation and impacts of chemical compounds used in aquaculture.
-Effects on benthic and pelagic assemblages or processes that are related to aquaculture activities.
-Interactions of wild fauna (invertebrates, fishes, birds, mammals) with aquaculture activities; genetic impacts on wild populations.
-Parasite and pathogen interactions between farmed and wild stocks.
-Comparisons of the environmental effects of traditional and organic aquaculture.
-Introductions of alien species; escape and intentional releases (seeding) of cultured organisms into the wild.
-Effects of capture-based aquaculture (ranching).
-Interactions of aquaculture installations with biofouling organisms and consequences of biofouling control measures.
-Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture; comparisons of re-circulation and ‘open’ systems.
-Effects of climate change and environmental variability on aquaculture activities.
-Modelling of aquaculture–environment interactions; assessment of carrying capacity.
-Interactions between aquaculture and other industries (e.g. tourism, fisheries, transport).
-Policy and practice of aquaculture regulation directed towards environmental management; site selection, spatial planning, Integrated Coastal Zone Management, and eco-ethics.