Jim Downs, Yoni Appelbaum, Drew Gilpin Faust, Kerri K. Greenidge, Stephanie McCurry, Megan Kate Nelson, Adam I. P. Smith
{"title":"\"Does the Civil War Matter?\": A Roundtable Discussion","authors":"Jim Downs, Yoni Appelbaum, Drew Gilpin Faust, Kerri K. Greenidge, Stephanie McCurry, Megan Kate Nelson, Adam I. P. Smith","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> \"Does the Civil War Matter?\"<span>A Roundtable Discussion</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jim Downs, ModeratorParticipants: Yoni Appelbaum, Drew Gilpin Faust, Kerri K. Greenidge, Stephanie McCurry, Megan Kate Nelson, and Adam I. P. Smith </li> </ul> <p>In 2004, <em>Civil War History</em> published Drew Gilpin Faust's \"'We Should Grow Too Fond of It': Why We Love the Civil War.\"<sup>1</sup> In the article, Faust analyzed the proliferation of Civil War scholarship and interrogated why the Civil War attracted the attention of a generation of scholars. She connected how the rise of social history benefited from the preservation of Civil War records. The article has become a classic in the field and remains a major contribution. As the journal's current editor, I have wondered if the Civil War still matters to scholars, teachers, readers, and the public as it did twenty years ago. As such, I organized a roundtable bringing together a range of scholars and writers to answer the question \"Does the Civil War Matter?\"</p> <p>I am deeply grateful that Drew Faust agreed to participate in the conversation. While anyone publishing or teaching or thinking about Civil War history could have participated, I selected the other panelists based on their specialties. Yoni Appelbaum, a member of the journal's editorial board, is a trained historian and is also the deputy editor at the <em>Atlantic</em>. I wanted his perspective on the reading public's interest in the war and how scholars might frame their research to interest a broader audience. Kerri K. Greenidge is a prolific historian of the Black experience in US history and has written widely on topics related to the Civil War. Stephanie McCurry is a leading historian of the South, whose research <strong>[End Page 50]</strong> questions led her to the Civil War. I wanted her insights as a Southern historian. Since region matters to the study of the Civil War, I asked Megan Kate Nelson, who has written three excellent books about the Civil War and about the Civil War both in the South and in the West, particularly among Indigenous people. Nelson is also a prolific writer and presents her research widely to nonacademic audiences. Adam I. P. Smith has written about the North during the Civil War and is also the director of the Rothermere American Institute at the University of Oxford. Given the great interest in the Civil War in the United Kingdom, especially among historians of the British American Nineteenth Century Historians organization, I was eager to add his perspective.</p> <small><strong>jim downs</strong>:</small> <p>Welcome! I'm really excited about this conversation, and I'm extraordinarily grateful for your time, especially in the last dog days of summer before classes start for many of you. One of the most generative aspects of editing the journal for me has been doing roundtable discussions. The goal is to capture the kind of energy that typically happens during the Q & A sessions at conferences and formalizing that conversation and making it, hopefully, part of a larger historiographic conversation.</p> <p>And so not to waste any time, I'm just going to ask to the first question, \"Does the Civil War matter?\"</p> <p>I will start by briefly answering it, and I am hoping you all can follow the lead by introducing yourself and taking a stab at the question.</p> <p>As a medical historian, I care about the Civil War because it's the largest epidemiological crisis of the nineteenth century. And yet, many medical historians skip over the Civil War, and many Civil War historians skip over the epidemiological crisis.</p> <small><strong>kerri k. greenidge</strong>:</small> <p>I'm the recent author of <em>The Grimkés: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family</em>. And my first book was <em>Black Radical the Life and Times of William Monroe Trotter</em>.</p> <p>I most definitely think the Civil War matters, because I think it's <em>the</em> moment in American history; you have a group of people who have been enslaved, who go through the process of emancipation and freedom. I also think it's significant because it's a time when African American people who had always acted in political ways experience a violent backlash. I also think it's intricately related to all the conversations that occur in the United States moving...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
"Does the Civil War Matter?"A Roundtable Discussion
Jim Downs, ModeratorParticipants: Yoni Appelbaum, Drew Gilpin Faust, Kerri K. Greenidge, Stephanie McCurry, Megan Kate Nelson, and Adam I. P. Smith
In 2004, Civil War History published Drew Gilpin Faust's "'We Should Grow Too Fond of It': Why We Love the Civil War."1 In the article, Faust analyzed the proliferation of Civil War scholarship and interrogated why the Civil War attracted the attention of a generation of scholars. She connected how the rise of social history benefited from the preservation of Civil War records. The article has become a classic in the field and remains a major contribution. As the journal's current editor, I have wondered if the Civil War still matters to scholars, teachers, readers, and the public as it did twenty years ago. As such, I organized a roundtable bringing together a range of scholars and writers to answer the question "Does the Civil War Matter?"
I am deeply grateful that Drew Faust agreed to participate in the conversation. While anyone publishing or teaching or thinking about Civil War history could have participated, I selected the other panelists based on their specialties. Yoni Appelbaum, a member of the journal's editorial board, is a trained historian and is also the deputy editor at the Atlantic. I wanted his perspective on the reading public's interest in the war and how scholars might frame their research to interest a broader audience. Kerri K. Greenidge is a prolific historian of the Black experience in US history and has written widely on topics related to the Civil War. Stephanie McCurry is a leading historian of the South, whose research [End Page 50] questions led her to the Civil War. I wanted her insights as a Southern historian. Since region matters to the study of the Civil War, I asked Megan Kate Nelson, who has written three excellent books about the Civil War and about the Civil War both in the South and in the West, particularly among Indigenous people. Nelson is also a prolific writer and presents her research widely to nonacademic audiences. Adam I. P. Smith has written about the North during the Civil War and is also the director of the Rothermere American Institute at the University of Oxford. Given the great interest in the Civil War in the United Kingdom, especially among historians of the British American Nineteenth Century Historians organization, I was eager to add his perspective.
jim downs:
Welcome! I'm really excited about this conversation, and I'm extraordinarily grateful for your time, especially in the last dog days of summer before classes start for many of you. One of the most generative aspects of editing the journal for me has been doing roundtable discussions. The goal is to capture the kind of energy that typically happens during the Q & A sessions at conferences and formalizing that conversation and making it, hopefully, part of a larger historiographic conversation.
And so not to waste any time, I'm just going to ask to the first question, "Does the Civil War matter?"
I will start by briefly answering it, and I am hoping you all can follow the lead by introducing yourself and taking a stab at the question.
As a medical historian, I care about the Civil War because it's the largest epidemiological crisis of the nineteenth century. And yet, many medical historians skip over the Civil War, and many Civil War historians skip over the epidemiological crisis.
kerri k. greenidge:
I'm the recent author of The Grimkés: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family. And my first book was Black Radical the Life and Times of William Monroe Trotter.
I most definitely think the Civil War matters, because I think it's the moment in American history; you have a group of people who have been enslaved, who go through the process of emancipation and freedom. I also think it's significant because it's a time when African American people who had always acted in political ways experience a violent backlash. I also think it's intricately related to all the conversations that occur in the United States moving...
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: "内战重要吗?"圆桌讨论 吉姆-唐斯(Jim Downs),主持人与会者:Yoni Appelbaum、Drew Gilpin Faust、Kerri K. Greenidge、Stephanie McCurry、Megan Kate Nelson 和 Adam I. P. Smith 2004 年,《内战史》发表了 Drew Gilpin Faust 的"'We Should Grow Too Fond of It':1 在这篇文章中,浮士德分析了内战学术研究的激增,并探讨了内战吸引一代学者关注的原因。她将社会史的兴起与内战记录的保存联系在一起。这篇文章已成为该领域的经典之作,至今仍是一项重大贡献。作为该期刊的现任编辑,我一直在想,内战对于学者、教师、读者和公众是否还像二十年前那样重要。因此,我组织了一次圆桌会议,召集了众多学者和作家来回答 "内战重要吗?我非常感谢德鲁-浮士德同意参加这次对话。虽然任何出版、教学或思考内战历史的人都可以参加,但我还是根据他们的专长选择了其他小组成员。本刊编辑委员会成员约尼-阿贝尔鲍姆(Yoni Appelbaum)是一位训练有素的历史学家,同时也是《大西洋月刊》的副主编。我想从他的角度了解读者对战争的兴趣,以及学者如何构建自己的研究才能吸引更多读者。Kerri K. Greenidge 是研究美国历史上黑人经历的多产历史学家,在内战相关主题方面著述颇丰。斯蒂芬妮-麦科里是一位著名的南方历史学家,她的研究 [第 50 页完] 问题将她引向了南北战争。我想了解她作为南方历史学家的见解。由于地区对南北战争的研究很重要,我请梅根-凯特-尼尔森(Megan Kate Nelson)为我解答,她写了三本关于南北战争以及南北战争在南方和西部,特别是在原住民中的出色著作。纳尔逊还是一位多产作家,她向非学术界读者广泛介绍了自己的研究成果。亚当-史密斯(Adam I. P. Smith)撰写了关于南北战争期间北方的文章,他还是牛津大学罗瑟米尔美国研究所(Rothermere American Institute)的所长。鉴于英国对内战的浓厚兴趣,尤其是英美十九世纪历史学家组织的历史学家,我很想加入他的观点:欢迎!我对这次谈话感到非常兴奋,也非常感谢你们抽出时间,尤其是在你们许多人开学前的最后几天暑假。对我来说,编辑期刊最有启发性的方面之一就是圆桌讨论。我们的目标是捕捉会议问答环节中通常会出现的那种能量,并将这种对话正式化,希望它能成为更大范围历史学对话的一部分。为了不浪费时间,我只想问第一个问题:"南北战争重要吗?我将首先简要回答这个问题,希望大家也能跟着我介绍一下自己,并对这个问题提出自己的看法。作为一名医学史学家,我关心南北战争,因为它是 19 世纪最大的流行病学危机。然而,许多医学史学家跳过了内战,许多内战史学家跳过了流行病危机:我是最近出版的《格雷姆克一家》(The Grimkés:一个美国家庭的奴隶制遗产》。我的第一本书是《黑人激进分子威廉-门罗-特罗特的生活与时代》。我非常肯定地认为南北战争很重要,因为我认为这是美国历史上的一个重要时刻;有一群人曾经被奴役,他们经历了解放和自由的过程。我还认为它意义重大,因为在这一时期,一直以政治方式行事的非裔美国人遭遇了暴力反击。我还认为,它与美国正在发生的所有对话都密切相关......
期刊介绍:
Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.