A Feminist and Decolonial Approach to Kinship: An Ambiguous and Ambivalent Account

IF 2.1 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Ruthanne Soohee Crapo Kim
{"title":"A Feminist and Decolonial Approach to Kinship: An Ambiguous and Ambivalent Account","authors":"Ruthanne Soohee Crapo Kim","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article briefly traces newer kinship studies at the edges of kinship formations and argues that a feminist, decolonial examination of kinship interrupts cultural relatedness as a capital set of social relations meant to satiate the ache to belong to or progenerate a group. Examining the coordinated relationship between kinning and de-kinning, the author exposes the suffering the social contract fails to register but reinscribes. Central to this analysis is kinship's global colonizing matrix dominated by white-heteronormative ableism that shapes and prices commodified belonging and generation. This global colonizing matrix is the focus of this inquiry, examined through a cursory consideration of the author's lived experience as a transnational and transracial adoptee and racial minority scholar who teaches majority BIPOC students. This account theorizes a specific experience of kinship to broaden the analysis for others to locate their narratives and ongoing contributions to the deformation and reformation of kinship studies.","PeriodicalId":40011,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Compass","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12961","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article briefly traces newer kinship studies at the edges of kinship formations and argues that a feminist, decolonial examination of kinship interrupts cultural relatedness as a capital set of social relations meant to satiate the ache to belong to or progenerate a group. Examining the coordinated relationship between kinning and de-kinning, the author exposes the suffering the social contract fails to register but reinscribes. Central to this analysis is kinship's global colonizing matrix dominated by white-heteronormative ableism that shapes and prices commodified belonging and generation. This global colonizing matrix is the focus of this inquiry, examined through a cursory consideration of the author's lived experience as a transnational and transracial adoptee and racial minority scholar who teaches majority BIPOC students. This account theorizes a specific experience of kinship to broaden the analysis for others to locate their narratives and ongoing contributions to the deformation and reformation of kinship studies.
女性主义和非殖民主义的亲缘关系:暧昧和矛盾的说法
本文在亲属关系形成的边缘简要追溯了较新的亲属关系研究,并认为对亲属关系进行女性主义的、非殖民主义的审视,会打断作为一套资本社会关系的文化关联性,而这套资本社会关系的目的是满足人们归属于一个群体或使其不断发展的渴望。通过研究亲属关系与去亲属关系之间的协调关系,作者揭示了社会契约未能记录却又重述的痛苦。这一分析的核心是亲缘关系的全球殖民化矩阵,该矩阵由白人异性恋全能主义主导,塑造并定价商品化的归属和生成。这一全球殖民化矩阵是本文探究的重点,通过对作者作为一名跨国跨种族收养者和少数种族学者的生活经历的粗略考量来进行研究,作者教授的学生大多数是 BIPOC。本报告将亲属关系的具体经历理论化,以扩大分析范围,使其他人能够找到自己的叙述,并为亲属关系研究的变形和改革做出持续贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philosophy Compass
Philosophy Compass Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信