Good body condition increases male attractiveness but not caring quality in a neotropical arachnid with male-only care

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Louise M. Alissa, Glauco Machado, Gustavo S. Requena
{"title":"Good body condition increases male attractiveness but not caring quality in a neotropical arachnid with male-only care","authors":"Louise M. Alissa, Glauco Machado, Gustavo S. Requena","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03439-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Female mate choice is usually based on traits that signal male quality as a sexual partner. According to the “good parent” hypothesis, female mate choice may also consider male quality as a caregiver in species with male-only care. Because parental activities may be costly, males in good condition should be more attractive to females than those in poor condition. We experimentally manipulated the body condition of non-parental and parental males of the egg-tending harvestman <i>Iporangaia pustulosa</i> and then evaluated how it affected their mating success and ability to protect eggs under field conditions. For non-parental males, individuals in good condition had twice the probability of mating than those in poor condition. For parental males, individuals in good condition had two times more chances of mating and acquired five times more eggs than those in poor condition. Surprisingly, males’ body condition had no effect on the efficiency of egg protection. Although our results indicate that the male condition is a sexually selected trait, we found no support for the “good parent hypothesis” given that an increase in body condition does not improve the survival of the offspring under male care. Instead, these findings are congruent with predictions of the “essential male care” model, which suggests that, when the costs of parental care are low (as is the case of egg attendance), most males can provide the minimum necessary care for offspring survival. However, only males in good condition can allocate surplus energy to advertise their overall quality and attract more mates.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Significance statement</h3><p>Studies examining female mate choice based on condition-dependent traits that serve as reliable indicators of male caregiving quality are mostly limited to vertebrates. We present one of the first empirical examples demonstrating that male body condition influences male attractiveness in an arthropod species exhibiting male-only care. Our field-based results show that females prefer males, whether non-parental or parental, in good body condition over those in poor condition. However, we found no evidence that an increase in body condition improves the survival of the offspring under male care. We propose that males in good body condition are more attractive because the relatively low costs of egg attendance allow them to allocate their surplus energy into advertising their overall quality. Our findings are congruent with predictions of the “essential male care” model, which explores resource allocation between paternal care and sexual advertising.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03439-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Female mate choice is usually based on traits that signal male quality as a sexual partner. According to the “good parent” hypothesis, female mate choice may also consider male quality as a caregiver in species with male-only care. Because parental activities may be costly, males in good condition should be more attractive to females than those in poor condition. We experimentally manipulated the body condition of non-parental and parental males of the egg-tending harvestman Iporangaia pustulosa and then evaluated how it affected their mating success and ability to protect eggs under field conditions. For non-parental males, individuals in good condition had twice the probability of mating than those in poor condition. For parental males, individuals in good condition had two times more chances of mating and acquired five times more eggs than those in poor condition. Surprisingly, males’ body condition had no effect on the efficiency of egg protection. Although our results indicate that the male condition is a sexually selected trait, we found no support for the “good parent hypothesis” given that an increase in body condition does not improve the survival of the offspring under male care. Instead, these findings are congruent with predictions of the “essential male care” model, which suggests that, when the costs of parental care are low (as is the case of egg attendance), most males can provide the minimum necessary care for offspring survival. However, only males in good condition can allocate surplus energy to advertise their overall quality and attract more mates.

Significance statement

Studies examining female mate choice based on condition-dependent traits that serve as reliable indicators of male caregiving quality are mostly limited to vertebrates. We present one of the first empirical examples demonstrating that male body condition influences male attractiveness in an arthropod species exhibiting male-only care. Our field-based results show that females prefer males, whether non-parental or parental, in good body condition over those in poor condition. However, we found no evidence that an increase in body condition improves the survival of the offspring under male care. We propose that males in good body condition are more attractive because the relatively low costs of egg attendance allow them to allocate their surplus energy into advertising their overall quality. Our findings are congruent with predictions of the “essential male care” model, which explores resource allocation between paternal care and sexual advertising.

Abstract Image

良好的身体状况会增加雄性的吸引力,但不会提高新热带蛛形纲中一种只受雄性照料的蛛形纲动物的照料质量
摘要雌性择偶通常基于雄性作为性伴侣的品质特征。根据 "好父母 "假说,在只有雄性照料的物种中,雌性择偶也可能考虑雄性作为照料者的质量。因为养育活动可能需要付出代价,所以身体状况好的雄性应该比身体状况差的雄性对雌性更有吸引力。我们通过实验操纵了产卵采收蛙(Iporangaia pustulosa)的非亲代雄性和亲代雄性的身体状况,然后评估了在野外条件下身体状况如何影响它们的交配成功率和保护卵的能力。对于非亲代雄性个体,状态好的个体交配概率是状态差的个体的两倍。对于亲本雄性来说,状态好的个体交配几率是状态差的个体的两倍,获得的卵也是状态差的个体的五倍。令人惊讶的是,雄性的身体状况对保护卵的效率没有影响。尽管我们的研究结果表明雄性的身体状况是一种性选择性状,但我们并没有发现 "好父母假说 "的支持,因为身体状况的改善并不能提高雄性照顾下后代的存活率。相反,这些发现与 "基本雄性照料 "模型的预测一致,该模型认为,当亲代照料成本较低时(如卵的出勤率),大多数雄性都能为后代的存活提供最低限度的必要照料。然而,只有状态良好的雄性才能分配剩余能量来宣传自己的整体素质并吸引更多的配偶。意义声明基于状态依赖性特征(作为雄性照料质量的可靠指标)来研究雌性配偶选择的研究大多局限于脊椎动物。我们首次通过实证研究证明,在节肢动物中,雄性的身体状况会影响雄性的吸引力。我们的野外研究结果表明,无论是非亲代还是亲代雄性,雌性都更喜欢身体状况好的雄性,而不是身体状况差的雄性。然而,我们没有发现任何证据表明身体状况的改善会提高雄性照料下后代的存活率。我们认为,身体状况好的雄性更有吸引力,因为参加产卵的成本相对较低,它们可以将剩余能量用于宣传自己的整体素质。我们的发现与 "基本雄性照料 "模型的预测一致,该模型探讨了父性照料和性广告之间的资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes reviews, original contributions and commentaries dealing with quantitative empirical and theoretical studies in the analysis of animal behavior at the level of the individual, group, population, community, and species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信