An Exploration of Collaborative Learning Experiences for Black STEM Students

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christen Priddie
{"title":"An Exploration of Collaborative Learning Experiences for Black STEM Students","authors":"Christen Priddie","doi":"10.1353/csd.2024.a919354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> An Exploration of Collaborative Learning Experiences for Black STEM Students <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christen Priddie (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Researchers continue to investigate the under-representation of Black undergraduate students in STEM majors. Hostile racial environments (George Mwangi et al., 2016) and the lack of culturally relevant resources (Johnson &amp; Elliott, 2020) inform participation and persistence for Black students in STEM majors. There are increased pushes for faculty to foster more inclusive and equitable STEM learning environments, but not all STEM faculty buy into this vision. Some faculty view a perceived dissonance between STEM subjects and culturally relevant concepts (Fairweather, 2008), while others are resistant to race-conscious discussions, value objectivity, and uphold a Eurocentric lens (Haynes &amp; Patton, 2019; McGee, 2020; Miriti, 2020). Buy-in from STEM faculty is critical to create and sustain equitable and inclusive pedagogical practices, but it is also important to assess whether students are initiating these collaborative experiences on their own, given faculty resistance. Therefore, one way to assist STEM faculty hesitant to introduce equitable pedagogical practices into their classrooms is to reassess a practice they likely already implement, such as collaborative learning.</p> <p>Collaborative learning is an instructional method designed to foster interactions among students in small groups working to achieve a similar goal (National Survey of Student Engagement, n.d.). The incorporation of collaborative learning and other active learning techniques has been used to counter the competitive and individualized \"chilly climate\" STEM culture perpetuates (Kennedy &amp; Odell, 2014). Moreover, increasing the quality of collaborative learning experiences can work to improve Black students' engagement within STEM environments. Black STEM students often lean on the support of their peers to help them overcome the barriers they experience within STEM environments (Morton et al., 2019). Given the protective factor community is for Black STEM students, collaborative learning can be a practice that would greatly benefit them because it naturally fosters a communal aspect in their learning experience. However, Black STEM students repeatedly note that their non-Black peers often avoid them in classroom interactions, making it difficult to sustain relationships and develop a sense of belonging (Dortch &amp; Patel, 2017). Such experiences may be due to Eurocentric practices upheld in these spaces. Therefore, collaborative learning experiences may become harmful if not implemented in intentional ways to lessen the marginalization of Black students.</p> <p>I framed this study through the collectivist cultural orientation indicator of the culturally engaging campus environments (CECE) model (Museus, 2014). The collectivist cultural <strong>[End Page 101]</strong> orientation indicator explains how students should experience environments that are more collectivist in nature, and this is particularly relevant for Black students as Black people as a whole tend to hold more collectivist worldviews (McGee &amp; Bentley, 2017). Therefore, the collectivist cultural orientation indicator provides justification for why connections need to be made between Black STEM students' reliance on peer support and the benefits of collaborative learning in STEM environments, both of which lean in to collectivist worldview notions of community building and support.</p> <h2>CURRENT STUDY</h2> <p>Limited literature exists examining Black STEM students' collaborative learning experiences, either combining Black students with other underrepresented minority students or comparing Black students to other racial/ethnic groups. I aimed to continue establishing knowledge on Black STEM students' collaborative learning experiences by conducting this explorative study to uncover factors predicting Black STEM students' engagement in collaborative learning. The research questions were as follows:</p> <ol> <li> <p>1. How do Black STEM students engage in collaborative learning compared to their non-STEM counterparts?</p> </li> <li> <p>2. How does collaborative learning relate to an institution's proportion of Black students, Black STEM students' sense of belonging, perceptions of supportive environments, and effective teaching practices?</p> </li> </ol> <h2>METHOD</h2> <h3>Positionality</h3> <p>Interrogating my positionality as I conducted this quantitative study is critical as I advance knowledge about Black STEM students' experiences (Martin et al., 2022). I am a Black woman higher education scholar who finds great value in community and who has engaged in isolating collaborative learning experiences throughout my education. Additionally, I do not believe a neutral approach exists when studying race, and my non-objective position influenced the study design, data analysis, and result interpretations. My positionality adds context for this study, and scholars who identify differently may contrive alternative implications from this work.</p> <h3>Data</h3> <p>This study used secondary data from the 2021...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":15454,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Development","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2024.a919354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • An Exploration of Collaborative Learning Experiences for Black STEM Students
  • Christen Priddie (bio)

Researchers continue to investigate the under-representation of Black undergraduate students in STEM majors. Hostile racial environments (George Mwangi et al., 2016) and the lack of culturally relevant resources (Johnson & Elliott, 2020) inform participation and persistence for Black students in STEM majors. There are increased pushes for faculty to foster more inclusive and equitable STEM learning environments, but not all STEM faculty buy into this vision. Some faculty view a perceived dissonance between STEM subjects and culturally relevant concepts (Fairweather, 2008), while others are resistant to race-conscious discussions, value objectivity, and uphold a Eurocentric lens (Haynes & Patton, 2019; McGee, 2020; Miriti, 2020). Buy-in from STEM faculty is critical to create and sustain equitable and inclusive pedagogical practices, but it is also important to assess whether students are initiating these collaborative experiences on their own, given faculty resistance. Therefore, one way to assist STEM faculty hesitant to introduce equitable pedagogical practices into their classrooms is to reassess a practice they likely already implement, such as collaborative learning.

Collaborative learning is an instructional method designed to foster interactions among students in small groups working to achieve a similar goal (National Survey of Student Engagement, n.d.). The incorporation of collaborative learning and other active learning techniques has been used to counter the competitive and individualized "chilly climate" STEM culture perpetuates (Kennedy & Odell, 2014). Moreover, increasing the quality of collaborative learning experiences can work to improve Black students' engagement within STEM environments. Black STEM students often lean on the support of their peers to help them overcome the barriers they experience within STEM environments (Morton et al., 2019). Given the protective factor community is for Black STEM students, collaborative learning can be a practice that would greatly benefit them because it naturally fosters a communal aspect in their learning experience. However, Black STEM students repeatedly note that their non-Black peers often avoid them in classroom interactions, making it difficult to sustain relationships and develop a sense of belonging (Dortch & Patel, 2017). Such experiences may be due to Eurocentric practices upheld in these spaces. Therefore, collaborative learning experiences may become harmful if not implemented in intentional ways to lessen the marginalization of Black students.

I framed this study through the collectivist cultural orientation indicator of the culturally engaging campus environments (CECE) model (Museus, 2014). The collectivist cultural [End Page 101] orientation indicator explains how students should experience environments that are more collectivist in nature, and this is particularly relevant for Black students as Black people as a whole tend to hold more collectivist worldviews (McGee & Bentley, 2017). Therefore, the collectivist cultural orientation indicator provides justification for why connections need to be made between Black STEM students' reliance on peer support and the benefits of collaborative learning in STEM environments, both of which lean in to collectivist worldview notions of community building and support.

CURRENT STUDY

Limited literature exists examining Black STEM students' collaborative learning experiences, either combining Black students with other underrepresented minority students or comparing Black students to other racial/ethnic groups. I aimed to continue establishing knowledge on Black STEM students' collaborative learning experiences by conducting this explorative study to uncover factors predicting Black STEM students' engagement in collaborative learning. The research questions were as follows:

  1. 1. How do Black STEM students engage in collaborative learning compared to their non-STEM counterparts?

  2. 2. How does collaborative learning relate to an institution's proportion of Black students, Black STEM students' sense of belonging, perceptions of supportive environments, and effective teaching practices?

METHOD

Positionality

Interrogating my positionality as I conducted this quantitative study is critical as I advance knowledge about Black STEM students' experiences (Martin et al., 2022). I am a Black woman higher education scholar who finds great value in community and who has engaged in isolating collaborative learning experiences throughout my education. Additionally, I do not believe a neutral approach exists when studying race, and my non-objective position influenced the study design, data analysis, and result interpretations. My positionality adds context for this study, and scholars who identify differently may contrive alternative implications from this work.

Data

This study used secondary data from the 2021...

黑人科技、工程和数学学生的合作学习经历探索
我的立场为本研究增添了背景,持不同观点的学者可能会从本研究中得出其他意义。数据 本研究使用的二手数据来自 2021...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Published six times per year for the American College Personnel Association.Founded in 1959, the Journal of College Student Development has been the leading source of research about college students and the field of student affairs for over four decades. JCSD is the largest empirical research journal in the field of student affairs and higher education, and is the official journal of the American College Personnel Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信