Simulation-based nozzle density optimization for maximized efficacy of a machine-vision weed control system for applications in turfgrass settings

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
Weed Technology Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1017/wet.2024.7
Paweł Petelewicz, Qiyu Zhou, Marco Schiavon, Gregory E. MacDonald, Arnold W. Schumann, Nathan S. Boyd
{"title":"Simulation-based nozzle density optimization for maximized efficacy of a machine-vision weed control system for applications in turfgrass settings","authors":"Paweł Petelewicz, Qiyu Zhou, Marco Schiavon, Gregory E. MacDonald, Arnold W. Schumann, Nathan S. Boyd","doi":"10.1017/wet.2024.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Targeted spray application technologies have the capacity to drastically reduce herbicide inputs, but to be successful, the performance of both machine vision (MV) based weed detection and actuator efficiency need to be optimized. This study assessed 1) the performance of spotted spurge recognition in ‘Latitude 36’ bermudagrass turf canopy using the You Only Look Once (YOLOv3) real-time multi-object detection algorithm, and 2) the impact of various nozzle densities on model efficiency and projected herbicide reduction under simulated conditions. The YOLOv3 model was trained and validated with a dataset of 1,191 images. The simulation design consisted of 4 grid matrix regimes (3 × 3, 6 × 6, 12 × 12, and 24 × 24), which would then correspond to 3, 6, 12, and 24 non-overlapping nozzles, respectively, covering a 50-cm wide band. Simulated efficiency testing was conducted using 50 images containing predictions (labels) generated with the trained YOLO model and, by applying each of the grid matrixes to individual images. The model resulted in prediction accuracy of a <jats:italic>F</jats:italic>1 <jats:italic>Score</jats:italic> of 0.62 <jats:italic>precision</jats:italic> of 0.65 and <jats:italic>recall</jats:italic> value of 0.60. Increased nozzle density (from 3 to 12) improved actuator precision and predicted herbicide-use efficiency with a reduction in false hits ratio from <jats:sup>∼</jats:sup>30% to 5%. The area required to ensure herbicide deposition to all spotted spurge detected within images was reduced to 18% resulting in <jats:sup>∼</jats:sup>80% herbicide savings compared to broadcast application. Slightly greater precision was predicted with 24 nozzles, but not statistically different from the 12-nozzle scenario. Using this turf/weed model as a basis, optimal actuator efficacy and herbicide savings would occur by increasing nozzle density from one to 12 nozzles with the context of a single band.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2024.7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Targeted spray application technologies have the capacity to drastically reduce herbicide inputs, but to be successful, the performance of both machine vision (MV) based weed detection and actuator efficiency need to be optimized. This study assessed 1) the performance of spotted spurge recognition in ‘Latitude 36’ bermudagrass turf canopy using the You Only Look Once (YOLOv3) real-time multi-object detection algorithm, and 2) the impact of various nozzle densities on model efficiency and projected herbicide reduction under simulated conditions. The YOLOv3 model was trained and validated with a dataset of 1,191 images. The simulation design consisted of 4 grid matrix regimes (3 × 3, 6 × 6, 12 × 12, and 24 × 24), which would then correspond to 3, 6, 12, and 24 non-overlapping nozzles, respectively, covering a 50-cm wide band. Simulated efficiency testing was conducted using 50 images containing predictions (labels) generated with the trained YOLO model and, by applying each of the grid matrixes to individual images. The model resulted in prediction accuracy of a F1 Score of 0.62 precision of 0.65 and recall value of 0.60. Increased nozzle density (from 3 to 12) improved actuator precision and predicted herbicide-use efficiency with a reduction in false hits ratio from 30% to 5%. The area required to ensure herbicide deposition to all spotted spurge detected within images was reduced to 18% resulting in 80% herbicide savings compared to broadcast application. Slightly greater precision was predicted with 24 nozzles, but not statistically different from the 12-nozzle scenario. Using this turf/weed model as a basis, optimal actuator efficacy and herbicide savings would occur by increasing nozzle density from one to 12 nozzles with the context of a single band.
基于仿真的喷嘴密度优化,使机器视觉除草系统在草坪应用中发挥最大功效
定向喷洒技术能够大幅减少除草剂的投入,但要取得成功,必须优化基于机器视觉(MV)的杂草检测性能和执行器效率。本研究评估了:1)使用 You Only Look Once (YOLOv3) 实时多目标检测算法识别 "纬度 36 "百慕大草草皮冠层中斑刺草的性能;2)在模拟条件下,各种喷嘴密度对模型效率和预计除草剂减少量的影响。YOLOv3 模型由 1,191 幅图像组成的数据集进行训练和验证。模拟设计包括 4 种网格矩阵制度(3 × 3、6 × 6、12 × 12 和 24 × 24),分别对应 3、6、12 和 24 个非重叠喷嘴,覆盖 50 厘米宽的区域。模拟效率测试使用了 50 幅图像,其中包含使用训练有素的 YOLO 模型生成的预测结果(标签),并将每个网格矩阵应用于单个图像。该模型的预测准确度为 F1 分数 0.62,精确度为 0.65,召回值为 0.60。喷嘴密度的增加(从 3 个增加到 12 个)提高了执行器的精度和除草剂的预测使用效率,误命中率从 30% 降至 5%。确保图像中检测到的所有斑刺玫都能喷洒除草剂所需的面积减少到 18%,与播撒施药相比,可节省 80% 的除草剂。24 个喷嘴的预测精度略高,但与 12 个喷嘴的方案没有统计学差异。以该草坪/杂草模型为基础,通过将喷嘴密度从 1 个增加到 12 个,并在单带范围内使用,可达到最佳执行器功效并节省除草剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信