Simulating desegregation through affordable housing development: an environmental health impact assessment of Connecticut zoning law

Saira Prasanth, Nire Oloyede, Xuezhixing Zhang, Kai Chen, Daniel Carrión
{"title":"Simulating desegregation through affordable housing development: an environmental health impact assessment of Connecticut zoning law","authors":"Saira Prasanth, Nire Oloyede, Xuezhixing Zhang, Kai Chen, Daniel Carrión","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.13.24302645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Residential segregation shapes access to health-promoting resources and drives health inequities in the United States. Connecticut Section 8-30g incentivizes municipalities to develop a housing stock that is at least 10% affordable housing. We used this implicit target to project the impact of increasing affordable housing across all 169 Connecticut municipalities on all-cause mortality among low-income residents. We modeled six ambient environmental exposures: fine particulate matter (PM2.5), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), summertime daily maximum heat index, greenness, and road traffic noise. We allocated new affordable housing to reach the 10% target in each town and simulated random movement of low-income households into new units using an inverse distance weighting penalty. We then quantified exposure changes and used established exposure-response functions to estimate deaths averted stratified by four ethnoracial groups: Asian, Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White. We quantified racialized segregation by computing a multi-group index of dissimilarity at baseline and post-simulation. Across 1,000 simulations, in one year (2019) we found on average 169 (95% CI: 84, 255) deaths averted from changes in greenness, 71 (95% CI: 49, 94) deaths averted from NO2, 9 (95% CI: 4, 14) deaths averted from noise, and marginal impacts from other exposures, with the highest rates of deaths averted observed among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White residents. Multi-group index of dissimilarity declined on average in all eight Connecticut counties post-simulation. Sensitivity analyses simulating a different population movement strategy and modeling a different year (2018) yielded consistent results. Strengthening desegregation policy may reduce deaths from environmental exposures among low-income residents. Further research should explore non-mortality impacts and additional mechanisms by which desegregation may advance health equity.","PeriodicalId":501555,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.13.24302645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential segregation shapes access to health-promoting resources and drives health inequities in the United States. Connecticut Section 8-30g incentivizes municipalities to develop a housing stock that is at least 10% affordable housing. We used this implicit target to project the impact of increasing affordable housing across all 169 Connecticut municipalities on all-cause mortality among low-income residents. We modeled six ambient environmental exposures: fine particulate matter (PM2.5), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), summertime daily maximum heat index, greenness, and road traffic noise. We allocated new affordable housing to reach the 10% target in each town and simulated random movement of low-income households into new units using an inverse distance weighting penalty. We then quantified exposure changes and used established exposure-response functions to estimate deaths averted stratified by four ethnoracial groups: Asian, Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White. We quantified racialized segregation by computing a multi-group index of dissimilarity at baseline and post-simulation. Across 1,000 simulations, in one year (2019) we found on average 169 (95% CI: 84, 255) deaths averted from changes in greenness, 71 (95% CI: 49, 94) deaths averted from NO2, 9 (95% CI: 4, 14) deaths averted from noise, and marginal impacts from other exposures, with the highest rates of deaths averted observed among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White residents. Multi-group index of dissimilarity declined on average in all eight Connecticut counties post-simulation. Sensitivity analyses simulating a different population movement strategy and modeling a different year (2018) yielded consistent results. Strengthening desegregation policy may reduce deaths from environmental exposures among low-income residents. Further research should explore non-mortality impacts and additional mechanisms by which desegregation may advance health equity.
通过经济适用房开发模拟消除种族隔离:康涅狄格州分区法的环境健康影响评估
在美国,居住隔离影响了促进健康资源的获取,并导致了健康不平等。康涅狄格州第 8-30g 条激励市政当局开发至少 10% 的经济适用房。我们利用这一隐性目标来预测康涅狄格州所有 169 个城市增加经济适用房对低收入居民全因死亡率的影响。我们模拟了六种环境暴露:细颗粒物 (PM2.5)、臭氧 (O3)、二氧化氮 (NO2)、夏季日最高热指数、绿化率和道路交通噪音。我们在每个城镇分配了新的经济适用房,以达到 10% 的目标,并使用反向距离加权惩罚模拟了低收入家庭向新单位的随机流动。然后,我们对暴露变化进行量化,并使用既定的暴露-反应函数来估算按四个种族群体分层的避免死亡人数:亚裔、西班牙裔或拉丁裔、非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人。我们通过计算基线和模拟后的多群体差异指数来量化种族隔离。在 1,000 次模拟中,我们发现在一年(2019 年)中,绿化变化平均避免了 169 例(95% CI:84 例,255 例)死亡,二氧化氮平均避免了 71 例(95% CI:49 例,94 例)死亡,噪声平均避免了 9 例(95% CI:4 例,14 例)死亡,其他暴露影响微乎其微,非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人居民中避免死亡的比例最高。模拟后,康涅狄格州所有八个县的多群体差异指数平均下降。模拟不同人口迁移策略和不同年份(2018 年)模型的敏感性分析得出了一致的结果。加强种族隔离政策可能会减少低收入居民因环境暴露而死亡的人数。进一步的研究应探索非死亡影响以及其他机制,通过这些机制,取消种族隔离可促进健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信