Comparative analysis of food waste laws in Singapore and Japan: an examination of legal frameworks in hope of achieving Singapore’s zero-waste vision

IF 0.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Wendy Wong Shih Ling
{"title":"Comparative analysis of food waste laws in Singapore and Japan: an examination of legal frameworks in hope of achieving Singapore’s zero-waste vision","authors":"Wendy Wong Shih Ling","doi":"10.4337/apjel.2023.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares food waste laws in Singapore and Japan and analyses similarities and differences in their legal approaches to minimizing food waste across the food supply chain. The research undertaken demonstrates that although there is broad alignment in many aspects of the two countries’ food waste recycling laws, the specific requirements differ significantly due to each country’s unique circumstances. This has given rise to implementation issues that hamper large-scale food waste recycling in Singapore. These issues encompass, inter alia, the law’s limited applicability to food-related establishments and the lack of clarity regarding acceptable output from food waste treatment processes. Moreover, Singapore does not have a separate law targeted at avoiding food loss, a potentially more effective approach that is aligned with the food waste hierarchy. However, Japan’s experience demonstrates that, even with a law in place, success in food waste prevention typically relies on voluntary efforts and strong public engagement. Based on these findings, the article concludes that Singapore’s existing food waste law can contribute to a certain extent the achievement of its ‘zero-waste’ vision.","PeriodicalId":41125,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/apjel.2023.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article compares food waste laws in Singapore and Japan and analyses similarities and differences in their legal approaches to minimizing food waste across the food supply chain. The research undertaken demonstrates that although there is broad alignment in many aspects of the two countries’ food waste recycling laws, the specific requirements differ significantly due to each country’s unique circumstances. This has given rise to implementation issues that hamper large-scale food waste recycling in Singapore. These issues encompass, inter alia, the law’s limited applicability to food-related establishments and the lack of clarity regarding acceptable output from food waste treatment processes. Moreover, Singapore does not have a separate law targeted at avoiding food loss, a potentially more effective approach that is aligned with the food waste hierarchy. However, Japan’s experience demonstrates that, even with a law in place, success in food waste prevention typically relies on voluntary efforts and strong public engagement. Based on these findings, the article concludes that Singapore’s existing food waste law can contribute to a certain extent the achievement of its ‘zero-waste’ vision.
新加坡和日本的厨余法律比较分析:对法律框架的研究,希望实现新加坡的零废弃愿景
本文比较了新加坡和日本的厨余法律,分析了两国在整个食品供应链中尽量减少厨余的法律方法的异同。研究表明,虽然两国的食物垃圾回收法在许多方面大体一致,但由于两国的国情不同,具体要求也大相径庭。这就产生了一些实施问题,阻碍了新加坡大规模的食物垃圾回收。这些问题主要包括法律对食品相关机构的适用性有限,以及对食物垃圾处理过程中可接受的产出缺乏明确规定。此外,新加坡没有针对避免食物损耗的单独法律,而避免食物损耗可能是一种更有效的方法,且与食物垃圾等级制度相一致。然而,日本的经验表明,即使制定了法律,防止食物浪费的成功通常也依赖于自愿努力和强有力的公众参与。基于这些研究结果,文章得出结论,新加坡现行的食物浪费法在一定程度上有助于实现其 "零浪费 "愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law (APJEL) is published in two issues each year by the Australian Centre for Climate and Environmental Law (ACCEL). To subscribe please complete the Subscription form and return to ACCEL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信