Safe and Verified Gomory Mixed-Integer Cuts in a Rational Mixed-Integer Program Framework

IF 2.6 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Leon Eifler, Ambros Gleixner
{"title":"Safe and Verified Gomory Mixed-Integer Cuts in a Rational Mixed-Integer Program Framework","authors":"Leon Eifler, Ambros Gleixner","doi":"10.1137/23m156046x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 1, Page 742-763, March 2024. <br/> Abstract. This paper is concerned with the exact solution of mixed-integer programs (MIPs) over the rational numbers, i.e., without any roundoff errors and error tolerances. Here, one computational bottleneck that should be avoided whenever possible is to employ large-scale symbolic computations. Instead it is often possible to use safe directed rounding methods, e.g., to generate provably correct dual bounds. In this work, we continue to leverage this paradigm and extend an exact branch-and-bound framework by separation routines for safe cutting planes, based on the approach first introduced by Cook, Dash, Fukasawa, and Goycoolea in 2009 [INFORMS J. Comput., 21 (2009), pp. 641–649]. Constraints are aggregated safely using approximate dual multipliers from an LP solve, followed by mixed-integer rounding to generate provably valid, although slightly weaker inequalities. We generalize this approach to problem data that is not representable in floating-point arithmetic, add routines for controlling the encoding length of the resulting cutting planes, and show how these cutting planes can be verified according to the VIPR certificate standard. Furthermore, we analyze the performance impact of these cutting planes in the context of an exact MIP framework, showing that we can solve 21.5% more instances to exact optimality and reduce solving times by 26.8% on the MIPLIB 2017 benchmark test set.","PeriodicalId":49529,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Optimization","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m156046x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SIAM Journal on Optimization, Volume 34, Issue 1, Page 742-763, March 2024.
Abstract. This paper is concerned with the exact solution of mixed-integer programs (MIPs) over the rational numbers, i.e., without any roundoff errors and error tolerances. Here, one computational bottleneck that should be avoided whenever possible is to employ large-scale symbolic computations. Instead it is often possible to use safe directed rounding methods, e.g., to generate provably correct dual bounds. In this work, we continue to leverage this paradigm and extend an exact branch-and-bound framework by separation routines for safe cutting planes, based on the approach first introduced by Cook, Dash, Fukasawa, and Goycoolea in 2009 [INFORMS J. Comput., 21 (2009), pp. 641–649]. Constraints are aggregated safely using approximate dual multipliers from an LP solve, followed by mixed-integer rounding to generate provably valid, although slightly weaker inequalities. We generalize this approach to problem data that is not representable in floating-point arithmetic, add routines for controlling the encoding length of the resulting cutting planes, and show how these cutting planes can be verified according to the VIPR certificate standard. Furthermore, we analyze the performance impact of these cutting planes in the context of an exact MIP framework, showing that we can solve 21.5% more instances to exact optimality and reduce solving times by 26.8% on the MIPLIB 2017 benchmark test set.
合理混合整数程序框架中安全且经过验证的高莫里混合整数切割
SIAM 优化期刊》,第 34 卷,第 1 期,第 742-763 页,2024 年 3 月。 摘要本文关注有理数混合整数程序(MIP)的精确求解,即没有任何舍入误差和误差容限。在此,应尽可能避免的一个计算瓶颈是采用大规模符号计算。相反,通常可以使用安全的定向舍入方法,例如,生成可证明正确的对偶边界。在这项工作中,我们继续利用这一范例,并基于 Cook、Dash、Fukasawa 和 Goycoolea 于 2009 年首次提出的方法[INFORMS J. Comput., 21 (2009), pp.]利用 LP 求解中的近似对偶乘数安全地汇总约束条件,然后进行混合整数舍入,生成可证明有效的不等式,尽管不等式稍弱。我们将这种方法推广到无法用浮点运算表示的问题数据上,添加了用于控制所生成切割平面的编码长度的例程,并展示了如何根据 VIPR 证书标准验证这些切割平面。此外,我们还在精确 MIP 框架的背景下分析了这些切割平面对性能的影响,结果表明,在 MIPLIB 2017 基准测试集上,我们可以多求解 21.5% 的实例,并将求解时间缩短 26.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SIAM Journal on Optimization
SIAM Journal on Optimization 数学-应用数学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The SIAM Journal on Optimization contains research articles on the theory and practice of optimization. The areas addressed include linear and quadratic programming, convex programming, nonlinear programming, complementarity problems, stochastic optimization, combinatorial optimization, integer programming, and convex, nonsmooth and variational analysis. Contributions may emphasize optimization theory, algorithms, software, computational practice, applications, or the links between these subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信