Understanding staff needs for Improving End-of-life Care in Critical Care Units

Simon Tavabie, Stephen Pearson, Janet Balabanovic, Anna Batho, Manoj Juj, Priscilla Katsande, Joanne Bennetts, Emily Collis, Timothy Bonnici
{"title":"Understanding staff needs for Improving End-of-life Care in Critical Care Units","authors":"Simon Tavabie, Stephen Pearson, Janet Balabanovic, Anna Batho, Manoj Juj, Priscilla Katsande, Joanne Bennetts, Emily Collis, Timothy Bonnici","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.09.24302454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Critical care is a place of frequent death, up to a quarter of those admitted die during admission. Caring for dying people provides many challenges, practically, professionally and personally. The aim of this study was to better understand the perspectives of staff caring for dying people in critical care and identify their priorities for improvement. Method: Three multidisciplinary focus groups of critical care staff at a large central London hospitals trust were facilitated with a semi structured format and digitally transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to extract themes. Results: N=34 (18 nursing, 7 allied health professionals, 6 medical, 3 clerical/administrative) The five themes were structured as priority statements: 'We need to recognise' included the subthemes of being 'sick enough to die' and potential rapid deteriorations in this setting; 'We need to understand' with subthemes of perspectives on dying and prioritising time for conversations; 'We need to connect' with subthemes of therapeutic relationship and physical presence; 'We need to collaborate' with subthemes of critical care working and empowerment, and cross teams working; 'We need support' with themes of experiencing support and making time to support others. Conclusion: We present an approach to identifying critical care departmental priorities for an end-of-life care improvement programme. The themes extracted will be used to evaluate systems for dying in critical care, aiming to empower staff to provide excellent care every time they look after a dying person.","PeriodicalId":501249,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.09.24302454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Critical care is a place of frequent death, up to a quarter of those admitted die during admission. Caring for dying people provides many challenges, practically, professionally and personally. The aim of this study was to better understand the perspectives of staff caring for dying people in critical care and identify their priorities for improvement. Method: Three multidisciplinary focus groups of critical care staff at a large central London hospitals trust were facilitated with a semi structured format and digitally transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to extract themes. Results: N=34 (18 nursing, 7 allied health professionals, 6 medical, 3 clerical/administrative) The five themes were structured as priority statements: 'We need to recognise' included the subthemes of being 'sick enough to die' and potential rapid deteriorations in this setting; 'We need to understand' with subthemes of perspectives on dying and prioritising time for conversations; 'We need to connect' with subthemes of therapeutic relationship and physical presence; 'We need to collaborate' with subthemes of critical care working and empowerment, and cross teams working; 'We need support' with themes of experiencing support and making time to support others. Conclusion: We present an approach to identifying critical care departmental priorities for an end-of-life care improvement programme. The themes extracted will be used to evaluate systems for dying in critical care, aiming to empower staff to provide excellent care every time they look after a dying person.
了解工作人员在改善重症监护病房临终关怀方面的需求
目的:重症监护是一个死亡频发的地方,多达四分之一的入院病人在入院期间死亡。护理临终病人在实践、专业和个人方面都面临着许多挑战。本研究的目的是更好地了解重症监护中护理临终病人的工作人员的观点,并确定他们需要改进的优先事项。研究方法通过半结构化的形式,对伦敦市中心一家大型医院的重症监护人员进行了三次多学科焦点小组讨论,并进行了数字转录。进行归纳式主题分析以提取主题。结果:N=34(18 名护理人员、7 名专职医疗人员、6 名医务人员、3 名文员/行政人员):我们需要认识到 "包括 "病入膏肓 "和在这种情况下可能迅速恶化的副主题;"我们需要理解 "包括对死亡的看法和优先安排谈话时间的副主题;"我们需要联系 "包括治疗关系和身体存在的副主题;"我们需要合作 "包括危重症护理工作和授权以及跨团队工作的副主题;"我们需要支持 "包括体验支持和挤出时间支持他人的主题。结论:我们介绍了一种为临终关怀改进计划确定重症监护部门优先事项的方法。所提取的主题将用于评估重症监护中的临终关怀系统,目的是让工作人员在每次护理临终患者时都能提供优质的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信