Leontief Paradox vs. Leontief Trade and Localized Factor Prices vs. Localized Trade Patterns

IF 1.1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Baoping Guo
{"title":"Leontief Paradox vs. Leontief Trade and Localized Factor Prices vs. Localized Trade Patterns","authors":"Baoping Guo","doi":"10.1007/s11294-024-09886-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective endowments and virtual endowments are insightful ideas to incorporate different technologies with the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek framework. This study shows that trade patterns are localized when countries have different technologies, while factor prices are non-equalized (or localized). The Leontief paradox is a localized trade phenomenon or pattern conceptually. It demonstrates that both effective endowments and virtual endowments can explain and present the trade pattern observed in the Leontief test. The core idea of the effective endowment (and the virtual endowment) is that a country exports its effective-abundant factor referred to by its productivity. This paper illustrates that the Leontief paradox arises naturally if a country’s actual factor abundance is inconsistent with its effective factor abundance. The study presents the price-trade equilibrium with non-equalized factor prices to help view trade patterns as trade consequences. The study shows that the Leontief paradox phenomenon may occur even in the absence of factor intensity reversal. The study proposes the factor price definition of trade patterns that mirrors trade patterns defined by factor abundances.</p>","PeriodicalId":45656,"journal":{"name":"International Advances in Economic Research","volume":"262 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Advances in Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-024-09886-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective endowments and virtual endowments are insightful ideas to incorporate different technologies with the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek framework. This study shows that trade patterns are localized when countries have different technologies, while factor prices are non-equalized (or localized). The Leontief paradox is a localized trade phenomenon or pattern conceptually. It demonstrates that both effective endowments and virtual endowments can explain and present the trade pattern observed in the Leontief test. The core idea of the effective endowment (and the virtual endowment) is that a country exports its effective-abundant factor referred to by its productivity. This paper illustrates that the Leontief paradox arises naturally if a country’s actual factor abundance is inconsistent with its effective factor abundance. The study presents the price-trade equilibrium with non-equalized factor prices to help view trade patterns as trade consequences. The study shows that the Leontief paradox phenomenon may occur even in the absence of factor intensity reversal. The study proposes the factor price definition of trade patterns that mirrors trade patterns defined by factor abundances.

Abstract Image

列昂惕夫悖论与列昂惕夫贸易,本地化要素价格与本地化贸易模式
有效禀赋和虚拟禀赋是将不同技术纳入赫克歇尔-俄林-瓦内克框架的精辟观点。本研究表明,当各国拥有不同的技术,而要素价格非平等化(或本地化)时,贸易模式是本地化的。从概念上讲,列昂惕夫悖论是一种本地化贸易现象或模式。它表明,有效禀赋和虚拟禀赋都可以解释和呈现在列昂惕夫检验中观察到的贸易模式。有效禀赋(和虚拟禀赋)的核心理念是,一国出口其生产率所指的有效丰富要素。本文说明,如果一国的实际要素丰度与其有效要素丰度不一致,就会自然产生列昂惕夫悖论。研究提出了非均等化要素价格的价格-贸易均衡,以帮助将贸易模式视为贸易后果。研究表明,即使没有要素密集度逆转,也可能出现列昂惕夫悖论现象。研究提出了贸易模式的要素价格定义,它反映了由要素丰度定义的贸易模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: International Advances in Economic Research (IAER) was established to promote the dissemination of economic and financial research within the international community. Founded in 1995 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified to provide the latest research on today''s economic policies and tomorrow''s economic and financial conditions. Economists can no longer be concerned with professional developments only in their home country. Research by scholars in one country can easily have implications for other countries, yet often vital results are not shared. Economic restructuring in a shrinking world demands close analysis and careful interpretation. In IAER, authors from around the globe look at these issues, coming together in the cross-fertilization of multinational ideas. The journal provides economists, financial specialists, and scholars in related disciplines with much-needed opportunities to share their insights with worldwide colleagues. Policy-oriented, empirical, and theoretical research papers in all economic and financial areas are welcome, without regard to methodological preferences or school of thought. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind, peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, IAER provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Research Notes section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. Research Notes has been established to facilitate this form of communication. The section provides a means by which short manuscripts of less than 200 words can quickly appear in IAER. The review process for these shorter manu scripts is usually completed within 30 days. Officially cited as: Int Adv Econ Res
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信