{"title":"Leontief Paradox vs. Leontief Trade and Localized Factor Prices vs. Localized Trade Patterns","authors":"Baoping Guo","doi":"10.1007/s11294-024-09886-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective endowments and virtual endowments are insightful ideas to incorporate different technologies with the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek framework. This study shows that trade patterns are localized when countries have different technologies, while factor prices are non-equalized (or localized). The Leontief paradox is a localized trade phenomenon or pattern conceptually. It demonstrates that both effective endowments and virtual endowments can explain and present the trade pattern observed in the Leontief test. The core idea of the effective endowment (and the virtual endowment) is that a country exports its effective-abundant factor referred to by its productivity. This paper illustrates that the Leontief paradox arises naturally if a country’s actual factor abundance is inconsistent with its effective factor abundance. The study presents the price-trade equilibrium with non-equalized factor prices to help view trade patterns as trade consequences. The study shows that the Leontief paradox phenomenon may occur even in the absence of factor intensity reversal. The study proposes the factor price definition of trade patterns that mirrors trade patterns defined by factor abundances.</p>","PeriodicalId":45656,"journal":{"name":"International Advances in Economic Research","volume":"262 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Advances in Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-024-09886-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective endowments and virtual endowments are insightful ideas to incorporate different technologies with the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek framework. This study shows that trade patterns are localized when countries have different technologies, while factor prices are non-equalized (or localized). The Leontief paradox is a localized trade phenomenon or pattern conceptually. It demonstrates that both effective endowments and virtual endowments can explain and present the trade pattern observed in the Leontief test. The core idea of the effective endowment (and the virtual endowment) is that a country exports its effective-abundant factor referred to by its productivity. This paper illustrates that the Leontief paradox arises naturally if a country’s actual factor abundance is inconsistent with its effective factor abundance. The study presents the price-trade equilibrium with non-equalized factor prices to help view trade patterns as trade consequences. The study shows that the Leontief paradox phenomenon may occur even in the absence of factor intensity reversal. The study proposes the factor price definition of trade patterns that mirrors trade patterns defined by factor abundances.
期刊介绍:
International Advances in Economic Research (IAER) was established to promote the dissemination of economic and financial research within the international community. Founded in 1995 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified to provide the latest research on today''s economic policies and tomorrow''s economic and financial conditions. Economists can no longer be concerned with professional developments only in their home country. Research by scholars in one country can easily have implications for other countries, yet often vital results are not shared. Economic restructuring in a shrinking world demands close analysis and careful interpretation. In IAER, authors from around the globe look at these issues, coming together in the cross-fertilization of multinational ideas. The journal provides economists, financial specialists, and scholars in related disciplines with much-needed opportunities to share their insights with worldwide colleagues. Policy-oriented, empirical, and theoretical research papers in all economic and financial areas are welcome, without regard to methodological preferences or school of thought. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind, peer review process.
In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, IAER provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Research Notes section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. Research Notes has been established to facilitate this form of communication. The section provides a means by which short manuscripts of less than 200 words can quickly appear in IAER. The review process for these shorter manu scripts is usually completed within 30 days.
Officially cited as: Int Adv Econ Res