Fertilization Methods Effect Spring Wheat Yield and Soil CH4 Fluxes in the Loess Plateau of China

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Lijuan Yan, Jiangqi Wu, Haiyan Wang, Jianyu Yuan
{"title":"Fertilization Methods Effect Spring Wheat Yield and Soil CH4 Fluxes in the Loess Plateau of China","authors":"Lijuan Yan, Jiangqi Wu, Haiyan Wang, Jianyu Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s42106-024-00281-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dryland agricultural soils are recognized as significant sites of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) absorption, making them integral to the global CH<sub>4</sub> budget. Nitrogen fertilization is commonly used by growers in these regions to obtain optimal wheat yields, but it is unclear how various methods may affect CH<sub>4</sub> absorption. Therefore, we conducted two years of field studies in the rain-fed agricultural experimental station in the semi-arid Loess Plateau in northwest China to test how four fertilization methods altered different crop and soil characteristics. Plots consisted of a popular spring wheat variety treated with either no fertilizer (CK), nitrogen fertilizer (N), organic manure (M), or a combination of nitrogen and organic manure (NM). We analyzed the effects each fertilization methods had on both yield and soil CH<sub>4</sub> flux. The results indicated that these soils act as a net sink of CH<sub>4</sub>. The NM treatment significantly increased wheat yield, while the N treatment significantly reduced CH<sub>4</sub> absorption. Furthermore, soil CH<sub>4</sub> absorption under each treatment had a clear temporal pattern, which peaked during the flowering stage. Our principal component analysis and linear regression analysis illustrated how CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes were significantly positively or negatively correlated with soil total nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and temperature (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05), potentially explaining 40% of the CH<sub>4</sub> variability. In conclusion, our results indicate that the co-application of nitrogen and organic manure can both support optimal wheat yield and effectively reduce the risk of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Production","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00281-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dryland agricultural soils are recognized as significant sites of methane (CH4) absorption, making them integral to the global CH4 budget. Nitrogen fertilization is commonly used by growers in these regions to obtain optimal wheat yields, but it is unclear how various methods may affect CH4 absorption. Therefore, we conducted two years of field studies in the rain-fed agricultural experimental station in the semi-arid Loess Plateau in northwest China to test how four fertilization methods altered different crop and soil characteristics. Plots consisted of a popular spring wheat variety treated with either no fertilizer (CK), nitrogen fertilizer (N), organic manure (M), or a combination of nitrogen and organic manure (NM). We analyzed the effects each fertilization methods had on both yield and soil CH4 flux. The results indicated that these soils act as a net sink of CH4. The NM treatment significantly increased wheat yield, while the N treatment significantly reduced CH4 absorption. Furthermore, soil CH4 absorption under each treatment had a clear temporal pattern, which peaked during the flowering stage. Our principal component analysis and linear regression analysis illustrated how CH4 fluxes were significantly positively or negatively correlated with soil total nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and temperature (P < 0.05), potentially explaining 40% of the CH4 variability. In conclusion, our results indicate that the co-application of nitrogen and organic manure can both support optimal wheat yield and effectively reduce the risk of CH4 emissions.

Abstract Image

施肥方法对中国黄土高原春小麦产量和土壤甲烷通量的影响
旱地农业土壤被认为是吸收甲烷(CH4)的重要场所,是全球 CH4 预算不可或缺的一部分。这些地区的种植者通常使用氮肥来获得最佳的小麦产量,但目前还不清楚各种施肥方法会如何影响 CH4 的吸收。因此,我们在中国西北半干旱黄土高原的雨水灌溉农业试验站进行了为期两年的实地研究,以检验四种施肥方法如何改变不同的作物和土壤特性。试验地块由一种常用的春小麦品种组成,施肥方式包括不施肥(CK)、施氮肥(N)、施有机肥(M)或氮肥与有机肥混合施肥(NM)。我们分析了每种施肥方法对产量和土壤甲烷通量的影响。结果表明,这些土壤是 CH4 的净吸收汇。氮肥处理明显提高了小麦产量,而氮肥处理则明显降低了小麦对 CH4 的吸收。此外,每种处理下的土壤甲烷吸收量都有明显的时间规律,在开花期达到峰值。我们的主成分分析和线性回归分析表明,CH4通量与土壤全氮、硝态氮和温度呈显著的正相关或负相关(P < 0.05),可能解释了40%的CH4变化。总之,我们的研究结果表明,氮肥和有机肥的共同施用既能支持小麦的最佳产量,又能有效降低 CH4 排放的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IJPP publishes original research papers and review papers related to physiology, ecology and production of field crops and forages at field, farm and landscape level. Preferred topics are: (1) yield gap in cropping systems: estimation, causes and closing measures, (2) ecological intensification of plant production, (3) improvement of water and nutrients management in plant production systems, (4) environmental impact of plant production, (5) climate change and plant production, and (6) responses of plant communities to extreme weather conditions. Please note that IJPP does not publish papers with a background in genetics and plant breeding, plant molecular biology, plant biotechnology, as well as soil science, meteorology, product process and post-harvest management unless they are strongly related to plant production under field conditions. Papers based on limited data or of local importance, and results from routine experiments will not normally be considered for publication. Field experiments should include at least two years and/or two environments. Papers on plants other than field crops and forages, and papers based on controlled-environment experiments will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信