Exploring and comparing pedagogical beliefs of university instructors in relation to their behavioural patterns regarding learning management system use
{"title":"Exploring and comparing pedagogical beliefs of university instructors in relation to their behavioural patterns regarding learning management system use","authors":"Chien-Yuan Su, Cheng-Huan Chen","doi":"10.1080/0144929x.2024.2315321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the relationship between instructors’ pedagogical beliefs and their usage of learning management systems (LMSs) is crucial in higher education. This study addresses this research gap ...","PeriodicalId":55392,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour & Information Technology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour & Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2024.2315321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between instructors’ pedagogical beliefs and their usage of learning management systems (LMSs) is crucial in higher education. This study addresses this research gap ...
期刊介绍:
Behaviour & Information Technology (BIT) puts people before technology. As such it deviates from other related journals. It is the primary scientific venue for peer-reviewed publications on human-centred IT.
BIT reports original research studies, practical case studies, and thoughtful articles on:
• usability and user experience (UX)
• human computer interaction (HCI)
• human-centred and user-centred design
• the social, business and human aspects of the digital world.
The Journal attracts authors and readers from a variety of disciplines (e.g., usability, user experience, psychology, ergonomics, computer science, and sociology), originating from both academics and industry.
All papers are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, will undertake rigorous double blind peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.