The management of grapevine downy mildew: from anti-resistance strategies to innovative approaches for fungicide resistance monitoring

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Silvia Laura Toffolatti, Beatrice Lecchi, Giuliana Maddalena, Demetrio Marcianò, Milda Stuknytė, Stefania Arioli, Diego Mora, Piero Attilio Bianco, Paolo Borsa, Mauro Coatti, Maya Waldner-Zulauf, Lorenzo Borghi, Stefano FF Torriani
{"title":"The management of grapevine downy mildew: from anti-resistance strategies to innovative approaches for fungicide resistance monitoring","authors":"Silvia Laura Toffolatti, Beatrice Lecchi, Giuliana Maddalena, Demetrio Marcianò, Milda Stuknytė, Stefania Arioli, Diego Mora, Piero Attilio Bianco, Paolo Borsa, Mauro Coatti, Maya Waldner-Zulauf, Lorenzo Borghi, Stefano FF Torriani","doi":"10.1007/s41348-024-00867-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efficient grapevine downy mildew control necessitates the implementation of anti-resistance strategies to ensure the ongoing efficacy of available substances and optimal disease control. With the gradual disappearance of multi-site fungicides from the market, reliance on single-site fungicides poses a long-term risk of selecting strains resistant to multiple modes of action. Challenges in disease management encompass selecting optimal spray programs and monitoring field population sensitivity. This study evaluated the efficacy of anti-resistance strategies, including two single-site fungicides (mandipropamid and oxathiapiprolin), on disease control and fungicide sensitivity through a combination of field trials and laboratory tests for the biological and molecular characterization of the pathogen populations over a three-year period (2019–2021). Mandipropamid, a cellulose synthase inhibitor, is used since a long time for downy mildew control, while oxathiapiprolin, an OxySterol Binding Protein homologue Inhibitor, was introduced recently. Field trials demonstrated effective disease control, even in the presence of mandipropamid-resistant strains (with G1105S/V mutations in <i>PvCesA3</i>) and revealed a pronounced selection and spread of resistance to both fungicides in the vineyard where disease pressure was higher. Characterizing pathogen strains remained a significant obstacle in sensitivity monitoring, hindering precise determination of resistance frequencies related to fungicide programs. Traditional techniques, in fact, lack the resolution required for high-throughput isolation and characterization of resistant individuals. To address this challenge, we propose utilizing flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting on field sporangia populations, a method able to determine both the number of resistant isolates and isolate pathogen strains in a single assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":16838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00867-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient grapevine downy mildew control necessitates the implementation of anti-resistance strategies to ensure the ongoing efficacy of available substances and optimal disease control. With the gradual disappearance of multi-site fungicides from the market, reliance on single-site fungicides poses a long-term risk of selecting strains resistant to multiple modes of action. Challenges in disease management encompass selecting optimal spray programs and monitoring field population sensitivity. This study evaluated the efficacy of anti-resistance strategies, including two single-site fungicides (mandipropamid and oxathiapiprolin), on disease control and fungicide sensitivity through a combination of field trials and laboratory tests for the biological and molecular characterization of the pathogen populations over a three-year period (2019–2021). Mandipropamid, a cellulose synthase inhibitor, is used since a long time for downy mildew control, while oxathiapiprolin, an OxySterol Binding Protein homologue Inhibitor, was introduced recently. Field trials demonstrated effective disease control, even in the presence of mandipropamid-resistant strains (with G1105S/V mutations in PvCesA3) and revealed a pronounced selection and spread of resistance to both fungicides in the vineyard where disease pressure was higher. Characterizing pathogen strains remained a significant obstacle in sensitivity monitoring, hindering precise determination of resistance frequencies related to fungicide programs. Traditional techniques, in fact, lack the resolution required for high-throughput isolation and characterization of resistant individuals. To address this challenge, we propose utilizing flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting on field sporangia populations, a method able to determine both the number of resistant isolates and isolate pathogen strains in a single assay.

Abstract Image

葡萄霜霉病的管理:从抗药性战略到杀菌剂抗药性监测的创新方法
要有效控制葡萄霜霉病,就必须实施抗药性战略,以确保现有药物的持续效力和最佳病害控制效果。随着多杀菌位点杀菌剂在市场上逐渐消失,依赖单杀菌位点杀菌剂会带来对多种作用模式产生抗性的菌株的长期风险。病害管理面临的挑战包括选择最佳喷洒方案和监测田间种群敏感性。本研究通过田间试验和实验室测试相结合的方式,对病原体种群的生物和分子特征进行了为期三年(2019-2021 年)的研究,评估了抗耐药性策略(包括两种单点杀菌剂(曼地丙酰胺和oxathiapiprolin))对病害控制和杀菌剂敏感性的效果。长期以来,纤维素合成酶抑制剂曼地丙胺一直被用于霜霉病的防治,而 Oxathiapiprolin 是一种 OxySterol 结合蛋白同源物抑制剂,最近才被引入。田间试验表明,即使存在曼地丙胺抗性菌株(PvCesA3 中有 G1105S/V 突变),也能有效控制病害,并发现在病害压力较大的葡萄园中,对这两种杀菌剂的抗性都有明显的选择和传播。病原体菌株的特征描述仍然是敏感性监测的一大障碍,妨碍了与杀菌剂计划相关的抗性频率的精确测定。事实上,传统技术缺乏高通量分离和鉴定抗性个体所需的分辨率。为了应对这一挑战,我们建议在田间孢子种群中使用流式细胞仪和荧光激活细胞分选法,这种方法能够在一次检测中确定抗性分离株的数量和分离病原菌株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection (JPDP) is an international scientific journal that publishes original research articles, reviews, short communications, position and opinion papers dealing with applied scientific aspects of plant pathology, plant health, plant protection and findings on newly occurring diseases and pests. "Special Issues" on coherent themes often arising from International Conferences are offered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信