Inpatient Admissions and Re-Admissions in Medicare Beneficiaries Initiating Umeclidinium/Vilanterol or Tiotropium Therapy

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Michael Bogart, Gary Yat-Hung Leung, Anissa Cyhaniuk, Kristi DiRocco
{"title":"Inpatient Admissions and Re-Admissions in Medicare Beneficiaries Initiating Umeclidinium/Vilanterol or Tiotropium Therapy","authors":"Michael Bogart, Gary Yat-Hung Leung, Anissa Cyhaniuk, Kristi DiRocco","doi":"10.2147/copd.s436654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are hospitalized are more likely to die from their illness and have increased likelihood of re-admission than those who are not. Subsequent re-admissions further increase the burden on healthcare systems. This study compared inpatient admission rates and time-to-first COPD-related inpatient admission among Medicare beneficiaries with COPD indexed on umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) versus tiotropium (TIO).<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> This retrospective study used the All-Payer Claims Database to investigate hospital admission and re-admission outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries with COPD with an initial pharmacy claim for UMEC/VI or TIO from 1 January 2015 to 28 February 2020. Inpatient admissions, baseline, and follow-up variables were assessed in patients indexed on UMEC/VI and TIO after propensity score matching (PSM), with time-to-first on-treatment COPD-related inpatient admission as the primary endpoint. Re-admissions were assessed among patients with a COPD-related inpatient admission in the 30- and 90-days post-discharge.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Post-PSM, 7152 patients indexed on UMEC/VI and 7069 on TIO were eligible for admissions analysis. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time-to-first COPD-related inpatient admission was 46.71 (87.99) days for patients indexed on UMEC/VI and 44.96 (85.90) days for those on TIO (p=0.06). The mean (SD) number of inpatient admissions per patient was 1.24 (2.92) for patients indexed on UMEC/VI and 1.26 (3.05) for those on TIO (p=0.49). Proportion of patients undergoing re-admissions was similar between treatments over both 30 and 90 days, excluding a significantly lower proportion of patients indexed on UMEC/VI than those indexed on TIO for COPD-related re-admissions for hospital stays of 4– 7 days and 7– 14 days, and all-cause re-admissions for stays of 4– 7 days.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Patients with COPD using Medicare in the US and receiving UMEC/VI or TIO reported similar time-to-first inpatient admission and similar proportion of re-admissions.<br/><br/><strong>Plain Language Summary:</strong> Umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) is associated with improvements in patient outcomes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) versus tiotropium (TIO). Patients with COPD who have hospitalizations have higher healthcare costs and are more likely to be re-hospitalized and die from their illness than those who do not. This study compared hospital admission rates and time to admission among Medicare beneficiaries with COPD treated with UMEC/VI versus TIO.<br/>This study used a medical record database to compare hospital admissions and re-admissions, baseline and follow-up variables were compared in patients prescribed with UMEC/VI and TIO from 1 January 2015 to 28 February 2020. Hospital re-admissions were assessed among patients with a COPD-related inpatient admission in the 30 or 90 days after discharge.<br/>Patients had similar COPD-related hospitalizations and number of hospital admissions per patient regardless of medication. Proportion of patients undergoing re-admissions was similar between treatments, apart from a lower proportion of patients prescribed UMEC/VI than TIO for COPD-related re-admissions for hospital stays of 4– 7 and 7– 14 days, and all-cause re-admissions for 4– 7 days.<br/>Despite expectations that patients receiving UMEC/VI would demonstrate increased time-to-first admission and a lower proportion of re-admissions than those receiving TIO, patients reported similar data irrespective of their prescribed medication. Use of head-to-head comparison with claims data and inability to divide patients based on lung function or clinical symptoms may have decreased chances of detecting any significant difference between the treatments, although these results support current recommendations on use of dual therapy.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> COPD, initial maintenance therapy, umeclidinium/vilanterol dual therapy, tiotropium monotherapy, hospital admissions, hospital re-admissions<br/>","PeriodicalId":13792,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s436654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are hospitalized are more likely to die from their illness and have increased likelihood of re-admission than those who are not. Subsequent re-admissions further increase the burden on healthcare systems. This study compared inpatient admission rates and time-to-first COPD-related inpatient admission among Medicare beneficiaries with COPD indexed on umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) versus tiotropium (TIO).
Patients and Methods: This retrospective study used the All-Payer Claims Database to investigate hospital admission and re-admission outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries with COPD with an initial pharmacy claim for UMEC/VI or TIO from 1 January 2015 to 28 February 2020. Inpatient admissions, baseline, and follow-up variables were assessed in patients indexed on UMEC/VI and TIO after propensity score matching (PSM), with time-to-first on-treatment COPD-related inpatient admission as the primary endpoint. Re-admissions were assessed among patients with a COPD-related inpatient admission in the 30- and 90-days post-discharge.
Results: Post-PSM, 7152 patients indexed on UMEC/VI and 7069 on TIO were eligible for admissions analysis. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time-to-first COPD-related inpatient admission was 46.71 (87.99) days for patients indexed on UMEC/VI and 44.96 (85.90) days for those on TIO (p=0.06). The mean (SD) number of inpatient admissions per patient was 1.24 (2.92) for patients indexed on UMEC/VI and 1.26 (3.05) for those on TIO (p=0.49). Proportion of patients undergoing re-admissions was similar between treatments over both 30 and 90 days, excluding a significantly lower proportion of patients indexed on UMEC/VI than those indexed on TIO for COPD-related re-admissions for hospital stays of 4– 7 days and 7– 14 days, and all-cause re-admissions for stays of 4– 7 days.
Conclusion: Patients with COPD using Medicare in the US and receiving UMEC/VI or TIO reported similar time-to-first inpatient admission and similar proportion of re-admissions.

Plain Language Summary: Umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) is associated with improvements in patient outcomes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) versus tiotropium (TIO). Patients with COPD who have hospitalizations have higher healthcare costs and are more likely to be re-hospitalized and die from their illness than those who do not. This study compared hospital admission rates and time to admission among Medicare beneficiaries with COPD treated with UMEC/VI versus TIO.
This study used a medical record database to compare hospital admissions and re-admissions, baseline and follow-up variables were compared in patients prescribed with UMEC/VI and TIO from 1 January 2015 to 28 February 2020. Hospital re-admissions were assessed among patients with a COPD-related inpatient admission in the 30 or 90 days after discharge.
Patients had similar COPD-related hospitalizations and number of hospital admissions per patient regardless of medication. Proportion of patients undergoing re-admissions was similar between treatments, apart from a lower proportion of patients prescribed UMEC/VI than TIO for COPD-related re-admissions for hospital stays of 4– 7 and 7– 14 days, and all-cause re-admissions for 4– 7 days.
Despite expectations that patients receiving UMEC/VI would demonstrate increased time-to-first admission and a lower proportion of re-admissions than those receiving TIO, patients reported similar data irrespective of their prescribed medication. Use of head-to-head comparison with claims data and inability to divide patients based on lung function or clinical symptoms may have decreased chances of detecting any significant difference between the treatments, although these results support current recommendations on use of dual therapy.

Keywords: COPD, initial maintenance therapy, umeclidinium/vilanterol dual therapy, tiotropium monotherapy, hospital admissions, hospital re-admissions
开始接受优甲乐/维兰特罗或噻托溴铵治疗的医疗保险受益人的住院和再次住院情况
目的:与未住院的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者相比,住院的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者因病死亡的可能性更大,再次入院的可能性也更大。随后的再次入院进一步加重了医疗系统的负担。本研究比较了使用优甲乐胺/维兰特罗(UMEC/VI)和噻托溴铵(TIO)的慢性阻塞性肺疾病医保受益人的住院率和首次慢性阻塞性肺疾病相关住院时间:这项回顾性研究利用全付费者索赔数据库调查了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 28 日期间首次药房索赔为 UMEC/VI 或 TIO 的慢性阻塞性肺病联邦医疗保险受益人的入院和再入院结果。经过倾向得分匹配(PSM)后,对UMEC/VI和TIO索引患者的入院情况、基线和随访变量进行了评估,并将首次接受治疗的COPD相关入院时间作为主要终点。对出院后30天和90天内再次入院的慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行评估:PSM后,有7152名UMEC/VI索引患者和7069名TIO索引患者符合入院分析条件。UMEC/VI和TIO指数患者首次入院治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的平均(标准差[SD])时间分别为46.71(87.99)天和44.96(85.90)天(P=0.06)。UMEC/VI指标患者的人均住院次数为1.24(2.92)次,TIO指标患者的人均住院次数为1.26(3.05)次(P=0.49)。在30天和90天内,不同治疗方法下再次入院的患者比例相似,但住院4-7天和7-14天的慢性阻塞性肺病相关再次入院患者比例,以及住院4-7天的全因再次入院患者比例,使用UMEC/VI的患者明显低于使用TIO的患者:在美国使用医疗保险并接受 UMEC/VI 或 TIO 治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者首次入院时间相似,再次入院比例相似。与不住院的慢性阻塞性肺病患者相比,住院的慢性阻塞性肺病患者的医疗费用更高,而且更有可能再次住院或因病死亡。本研究比较了接受 UMEC/VI 和 TIO 治疗的慢性阻塞性肺病医保受益人的入院率和入院时间。本研究使用病历数据库比较了入院率和再入院率,比较了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 28 日期间接受 UMEC/VI 和 TIO 治疗的患者的基线和随访变量。对出院后30天或90天内接受过COPD相关住院治疗的患者的再入院情况进行了评估。接受UMEC/VI治疗的患者再次入院的比例与接受TIO治疗的患者相似,但接受UMEC/VI治疗的患者在4-7天和7-14天的COPD相关再次入院的比例低于接受TIO治疗的患者,在4-7天的所有原因再次入院的比例也低于接受TIO治疗的患者。使用索赔数据进行头对头比较,以及无法根据肺功能或临床症状对患者进行分类,可能会降低检测出治疗之间存在显著差异的几率,尽管这些结果支持目前关于使用双重疗法的建议:慢性阻塞性肺疾病、初始维持疗法、乌美利定/维兰特罗双重疗法、噻托溴铵单药疗法、入院率、再次入院率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信