Understanding Indian ride-sharing consumers: the role of psychographics and perceived value

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
Kedar Bhatt
{"title":"Understanding Indian ride-sharing consumers: the role of psychographics and perceived value","authors":"Kedar Bhatt","doi":"10.1108/jibr-05-2023-0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to explain the influence of four socio-psychological variables: social comparison orientation, face saving (FS), status consumption (STC) and frugality (FGL) on consumers’ value perception toward ride-sharing services – one of the most widely used collaborative consumption models. Furthermore, it assesses how perceived value affects consumers’ intention to use (IU) the ride-sharing services and intentions to substitute ride-sharing services for using a personally owned car. It also assesses the moderating effect of psychographics on the relationship between consumers’ perception and behavioral intention.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A structured questionnaire was developed using existing scales adapted from the literature to test the hypothesized relationships. The data for the study were collected from 489 users of ride-sharing services in India. Structural equation modelling was performed to test the proposed model using AMOS 18 and moderation analysis was performed using PROCESS MACRO.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings of the study suggest that social comparison, FS, STC and FGL have a significant influence on consumers’ value (utilitarian and hedonic) perception. Furthermore, the results supported the effect of consumers’ value perception on their IU the ride-sharing services as well as their intention to substitute ride-sharing services for using a personally owned car. Lastly, the results also evidenced the moderating role of psychographic variables.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Very few studies have examined the role of psychographics in the adoption of collaborative consumption services. The paper attempts to fill this gap. It assesses the effect of four relevant consumer traits on perceived value in the ride-sharing services context. Furthermore, it expands the understanding of the role of psychographics by measuring their moderating effects apart from direct effects. The results of the study bear important implications for academicians, policymakers and marketers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-05-2023-0157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to explain the influence of four socio-psychological variables: social comparison orientation, face saving (FS), status consumption (STC) and frugality (FGL) on consumers’ value perception toward ride-sharing services – one of the most widely used collaborative consumption models. Furthermore, it assesses how perceived value affects consumers’ intention to use (IU) the ride-sharing services and intentions to substitute ride-sharing services for using a personally owned car. It also assesses the moderating effect of psychographics on the relationship between consumers’ perception and behavioral intention.

Design/methodology/approach

A structured questionnaire was developed using existing scales adapted from the literature to test the hypothesized relationships. The data for the study were collected from 489 users of ride-sharing services in India. Structural equation modelling was performed to test the proposed model using AMOS 18 and moderation analysis was performed using PROCESS MACRO.

Findings

The findings of the study suggest that social comparison, FS, STC and FGL have a significant influence on consumers’ value (utilitarian and hedonic) perception. Furthermore, the results supported the effect of consumers’ value perception on their IU the ride-sharing services as well as their intention to substitute ride-sharing services for using a personally owned car. Lastly, the results also evidenced the moderating role of psychographic variables.

Originality/value

Very few studies have examined the role of psychographics in the adoption of collaborative consumption services. The paper attempts to fill this gap. It assesses the effect of four relevant consumer traits on perceived value in the ride-sharing services context. Furthermore, it expands the understanding of the role of psychographics by measuring their moderating effects apart from direct effects. The results of the study bear important implications for academicians, policymakers and marketers.

了解印度共享乘车消费者:心理特征和感知价值的作用
目的 本研究旨在解释四个社会心理变量:社会比较取向、面子(FS)、地位消费(STC)和节俭(FGL)对消费者对共享乘车服务--最广泛使用的协作消费模式之一--的价值感知的影响。此外,本研究还评估了价值感知如何影响消费者对共享乘车服务的使用意向(IU)以及用共享乘车服务替代个人汽车的意向。本研究还评估了心理特征对消费者感知和行为意向之间关系的调节作用。设计/方法/途径为检验假设的关系,我们使用从文献中改编的现有量表编制了一份结构化问卷。研究数据收集自印度 489 名共享乘车服务用户。研究结果表明,社会比较、FS、STC 和 FGL 对消费者的价值感(功利性和享乐性)有显著影响。此外,研究结果还证实了消费者的价值感对其对共享汽车服务的IU以及替代共享汽车服务的意愿的影响。最后,研究结果还证明了心理统计学变量的调节作用。本文试图填补这一空白。它评估了四种相关的消费者特征在共享乘车服务中对感知价值的影响。此外,除直接影响外,本文还通过测量心理特征的调节作用,拓展了对心理特征作用的理解。研究结果对学术界、政策制定者和营销人员具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信