A combined deep CNN-RNN network for rainfall-runoff modelling in Bardha Watershed, India

Padala Raja Shekar , Aneesh Mathew , P.V. Yeswanth , S. Deivalakshmi
{"title":"A combined deep CNN-RNN network for rainfall-runoff modelling in Bardha Watershed, India","authors":"Padala Raja Shekar ,&nbsp;Aneesh Mathew ,&nbsp;P.V. Yeswanth ,&nbsp;S. Deivalakshmi","doi":"10.1016/j.aiig.2024.100073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using artificial intelligence (AI) for rainfall-runoff modelling, as it has shown promising adaptability in this context. The current study involved the use of six distinct AI models to simulate monthly rainfall-runoff modelling in the Bardha watershed, India. These models included the artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbour regression model (KNN), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) regression model, random forest regression model (RF), convolutional neural network (CNN), and CNN-RNN (convolutional recurrent neural network). The years 2003–2007 are classified as the calibration or training period, while the years 2008–2009 are classified as the validation or testing period for the span of time 2003 to 2009. The available rainfall, maximum and minimum temperatures, and discharge data were collected and utilized in the models. To compare the performance of the models, five criteria were employed: R<sup>2</sup>, NSE, MAE, RMSE, and PBIAS. The CNN-RNN model simulates the rainfall-runoff model in the Bardha watershed best in both the training and testing periods (training: R<sup>2</sup> is 0.99, NSE is 0.99, MAE is 1.76, RMSE is 3.11, and PBIAS is −1.45; testing: R<sup>2</sup> is 0.97, NSE is 0.97, MAE is 2.05, RMSE is 3.60, and PBIAS is −3.94). These results demonstrate the superior performance of the CNN-RNN model in simulating monthly rainfall-runoff modelling when compared to the other models used in the study. The findings suggest that the CNN-RNN model could be a valuable tool for various applications related to sustainable water resource management, flood control, and environmental planning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100124,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544124000145/pdfft?md5=b53eadaf8de4641ef8cb149b0d56ea1f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666544124000145-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544124000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using artificial intelligence (AI) for rainfall-runoff modelling, as it has shown promising adaptability in this context. The current study involved the use of six distinct AI models to simulate monthly rainfall-runoff modelling in the Bardha watershed, India. These models included the artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbour regression model (KNN), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) regression model, random forest regression model (RF), convolutional neural network (CNN), and CNN-RNN (convolutional recurrent neural network). The years 2003–2007 are classified as the calibration or training period, while the years 2008–2009 are classified as the validation or testing period for the span of time 2003 to 2009. The available rainfall, maximum and minimum temperatures, and discharge data were collected and utilized in the models. To compare the performance of the models, five criteria were employed: R2, NSE, MAE, RMSE, and PBIAS. The CNN-RNN model simulates the rainfall-runoff model in the Bardha watershed best in both the training and testing periods (training: R2 is 0.99, NSE is 0.99, MAE is 1.76, RMSE is 3.11, and PBIAS is −1.45; testing: R2 is 0.97, NSE is 0.97, MAE is 2.05, RMSE is 3.60, and PBIAS is −3.94). These results demonstrate the superior performance of the CNN-RNN model in simulating monthly rainfall-runoff modelling when compared to the other models used in the study. The findings suggest that the CNN-RNN model could be a valuable tool for various applications related to sustainable water resource management, flood control, and environmental planning.

用于印度 Bardha 流域降雨-径流建模的深度 CNN-RNN 组合网络
近年来,人们对使用人工智能(AI)进行降雨-径流建模的兴趣与日俱增,因为人工智能在这方面显示出良好的适应性。本研究使用了六种不同的人工智能模型来模拟印度 Bardha 流域的月降雨-径流模型。这些模型包括人工神经网络(ANN)、k-近邻回归模型(KNN)、极梯度提升(XGBoost)回归模型、随机森林回归模型(RF)、卷积神经网络(CNN)和卷积递归神经网络(CNN-RNN)。2003 年至 2007 年为校准或训练期,2008 年至 2009 年为验证或测试期。模型收集并利用了现有的降雨量、最高和最低气温以及排水量数据。为了比较模型的性能,采用了五个标准:R2、NSE、MAE、RMSE 和 PBIAS。CNN-RNN 模型在训练期和测试期都能最好地模拟 Bardha 流域的降雨-径流模型(训练期:R2 为 0.99;测试期:R2 为 0.99):R2 为 0.99,NSE 为 0.99,MAE 为 1.76,RMSE 为 3.11,PBIAS 为-1.45;测试:R2 为 0.97,NSE 为 0.99,MAE 为 1.76,RMSE 为 3.11,PBIAS 为-1.45:R2 为 0.97,NSE 为 0.97,MAE 为 2.05,RMSE 为 3.60,PBIAS 为-3.94)。这些结果表明,与研究中使用的其他模型相比,CNN-RNN 模型在模拟月降雨-径流模型方面表现出色。研究结果表明,CNN-RNN 模型可以成为与可持续水资源管理、防洪和环境规划相关的各种应用的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信