Defining a radiomics feature selection method for predicting response to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Helen Zhang , Li Yang , Amanda Laguna , Jing Wu , Beiji Zou , Alireza Mohseni , Rajat S. Chandra , Tej I. Mehta , Hossam A. Zaki , Paul Zhang , Zhicheng Jiao , Ihab R. Kamel , Harrison X. Bai
{"title":"Defining a radiomics feature selection method for predicting response to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients","authors":"Helen Zhang ,&nbsp;Li Yang ,&nbsp;Amanda Laguna ,&nbsp;Jing Wu ,&nbsp;Beiji Zou ,&nbsp;Alireza Mohseni ,&nbsp;Rajat S. Chandra ,&nbsp;Tej I. Mehta ,&nbsp;Hossam A. Zaki ,&nbsp;Paul Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhicheng Jiao ,&nbsp;Ihab R. Kamel ,&nbsp;Harrison X. Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.metrad.2024.100067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the utility of different radiomics feature selection methods in predicting transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This study employed a dataset of 136 paired MR T1-weighted contrast-enhanced abdominal images with liver tumor masks before and after TACE. TACE response for each image pair was classified by European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) guidelines. 100D feature vectors were generated for the paired tumor areas. Eighteen existing feature selection methods were employed to select the top-<em>k</em> features to train and test a non-linear support vector machine (SVM) with a Gaussian kernel. Five-cross validation was performed to identify the highest performing feature selection methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For all benchmarks, a L0-based method selecting the top-5 or top-10 features achieved the highest performance. For images classified with EASL criteria that were analyzed with the L0-based method, the accuracy (ACC), area under curve (AUC), and balanced F score (F1-score) were 0.75 ​± ​0.06, 0.75 ​± ​0.09, and 0.80 ​± ​0.05, respectively. For images classified with mRECIST criteria that were analyzed with the L0-based method, the ACC, AUC, and F1-score were 0.75 ​± ​0.07, 0.71 ​± ​0.16, and 0.82 ​± ​0.04, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A L0-based method that selected the top-5/10 most important features predicted TACE response in HCC patients with the highest accuracy under both EASL and mRECIST criteria. This proof-of-concept investigation represents a step forward in the development of a reliable clinical decision-making tool for management of intermediate HCC patients undergoing TACE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100921,"journal":{"name":"Meta-Radiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950162824000201/pdfft?md5=8513ed2500d33d7dfeaead31453e96bd&pid=1-s2.0-S2950162824000201-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meta-Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950162824000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To assess the utility of different radiomics feature selection methods in predicting transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Materials and methods

This study employed a dataset of 136 paired MR T1-weighted contrast-enhanced abdominal images with liver tumor masks before and after TACE. TACE response for each image pair was classified by European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) guidelines. 100D feature vectors were generated for the paired tumor areas. Eighteen existing feature selection methods were employed to select the top-k features to train and test a non-linear support vector machine (SVM) with a Gaussian kernel. Five-cross validation was performed to identify the highest performing feature selection methods.

Results

For all benchmarks, a L0-based method selecting the top-5 or top-10 features achieved the highest performance. For images classified with EASL criteria that were analyzed with the L0-based method, the accuracy (ACC), area under curve (AUC), and balanced F score (F1-score) were 0.75 ​± ​0.06, 0.75 ​± ​0.09, and 0.80 ​± ​0.05, respectively. For images classified with mRECIST criteria that were analyzed with the L0-based method, the ACC, AUC, and F1-score were 0.75 ​± ​0.07, 0.71 ​± ​0.16, and 0.82 ​± ​0.04, respectively.

Conclusion

A L0-based method that selected the top-5/10 most important features predicted TACE response in HCC patients with the highest accuracy under both EASL and mRECIST criteria. This proof-of-concept investigation represents a step forward in the development of a reliable clinical decision-making tool for management of intermediate HCC patients undergoing TACE.

Abstract Image

为预测肝细胞癌患者对经动脉化疗栓塞治疗的反应确定放射组学特征选择方法
目的评估不同放射组学特征选择方法在预测肝细胞癌(HCC)患者经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)反应中的实用性。根据欧洲肝脏研究协会(EASL)和修正的实体瘤反应评估标准(mRECIST)指南对每对图像的 TACE 反应进行分类。为配对的肿瘤区域生成了 100D 特征向量。采用了 18 种现有的特征选择方法来选择前 k 个特征,以训练和测试带有高斯核的非线性支持向量机 (SVM)。结果在所有基准中,基于 L0 的方法选择前 5 个或前 10 个特征的性能最高。使用基于 L0 的方法分析了根据 EASL 标准分类的图像,其准确率(ACC)、曲线下面积(AUC)和平衡 F 分数(F1-score)分别为 0.75 ± 0.06、0.75 ± 0.09 和 0.80 ± 0.05。结论一种基于 L0 的方法可以选择前 5/10 个最重要的特征,在 EASL 和 mRECIST 标准下预测 HCC 患者的 TACE 反应的准确性最高。这项概念验证研究表明,在开发用于管理接受 TACE 的中度 HCC 患者的可靠临床决策工具方面又向前迈进了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信