Randomized controlled trial of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy: study protocol for the kinetic trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Jakob Hedberg, Magnus Sundbom, David Edholm, Eirik Kjus Aahlin, Eva Szabo, Fredrik Lindberg, Gjermund Johnsen, Dag Tidemann Førland, Jan Johansson, Joonas H Kauppila, Lars Bo Svendsen, Magnus Nilsson, Mats Lindblad, Pernilla Lagergren, Michael Hareskov Larsen, Oscar Åkesson, Per Löfdahl, Tom Mala, Michael Patrick Achiam
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy: study protocol for the kinetic trial.","authors":"Jakob Hedberg, Magnus Sundbom, David Edholm, Eirik Kjus Aahlin, Eva Szabo, Fredrik Lindberg, Gjermund Johnsen, Dag Tidemann Førland, Jan Johansson, Joonas H Kauppila, Lars Bo Svendsen, Magnus Nilsson, Mats Lindblad, Pernilla Lagergren, Michael Hareskov Larsen, Oscar Åkesson, Per Löfdahl, Tom Mala, Michael Patrick Achiam","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophagectomy is a complex and complication laden procedure. Despite centralization, variations in perioparative strategies reflect a paucity of evidence regarding optimal routines. The use of nasogastric (NG) tubes post esophagectomy is typically associated with significant discomfort for the patients. We hypothesize that immediate postoperative removal of the NG tube is non-inferior to current routines. All Nordic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer centers were invited to participate in this open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria include resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. A pretrial survey was undertaken and was the foundation for a consensus process resulting in the Kinetic trial, an RCT allocating patients to either no use of a NG tube (intervention) or 5 days of postoperative NG tube use (control) with anastomotic leakage as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pulmonary complications, overall complications, length of stay, health related quality of life. A sample size of 450 patients is planned (Kinetic trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085). Thirteen Nordic centers with a combined catchment area of 17 million inhabitants have entered the trial and ethical approval was granted in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. All centers routinely use NG tube and all but one center use total or hybrid minimally invasive-surgical approach. Inclusion began in January 2022 and the first annual safety board assessment has deemed the trial safe and recommended continuation. We have launched the first adequately powered multi-center pragmatic controlled randomized clinical trial regarding NG tube use after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11144291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Esophagectomy is a complex and complication laden procedure. Despite centralization, variations in perioparative strategies reflect a paucity of evidence regarding optimal routines. The use of nasogastric (NG) tubes post esophagectomy is typically associated with significant discomfort for the patients. We hypothesize that immediate postoperative removal of the NG tube is non-inferior to current routines. All Nordic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer centers were invited to participate in this open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria include resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. A pretrial survey was undertaken and was the foundation for a consensus process resulting in the Kinetic trial, an RCT allocating patients to either no use of a NG tube (intervention) or 5 days of postoperative NG tube use (control) with anastomotic leakage as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pulmonary complications, overall complications, length of stay, health related quality of life. A sample size of 450 patients is planned (Kinetic trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085). Thirteen Nordic centers with a combined catchment area of 17 million inhabitants have entered the trial and ethical approval was granted in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. All centers routinely use NG tube and all but one center use total or hybrid minimally invasive-surgical approach. Inclusion began in January 2022 and the first annual safety board assessment has deemed the trial safe and recommended continuation. We have launched the first adequately powered multi-center pragmatic controlled randomized clinical trial regarding NG tube use after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.

食管切除术后使用鼻胃管的随机对照试验:动力学试验研究方案。
食管切除术是一项复杂且并发症多发的手术。尽管手术集中进行,但围手术期策略的不同反映出最佳常规的证据不足。食管切除术后使用鼻胃管(NG)通常会给患者带来明显不适。我们假设,术后立即拔除鼻胃管的效果并不优于目前的常规方法。所有北欧上消化道癌症中心都受邀参加这项开放标签实用随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入标准包括局部晚期食管癌切除术和胃管重建术。这项随机对照试验将患者分配为不使用 NG 管(干预)或术后使用 5 天 NG 管(对照),以吻合口漏为主要终点。次要终点包括肺部并发症、总体并发症、住院时间、与健康相关的生活质量。计划样本量为 450 名患者(Kinetic 试验:https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085)。瑞典、挪威、芬兰和丹麦的 13 家北欧中心已加入该试验,这些中心的总覆盖面积达 1700 万居民,并已获得伦理批准。所有中心均常规使用 NG 管,除一家中心外,其他中心均使用全微创或混合微创手术方法。试验于 2022 年 1 月开始纳入,首次年度安全委员会评估认为试验是安全的,建议继续进行。我们已经启动了首个关于食管切除术后胃导管重建术后 NG 管使用的充分供电多中心实用对照随机临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信