Nonpharmacological Interventions for Chronic Pain in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Dara Kiu Yi Leung, Annabelle Pui Chi Fong, Frankie Ho Chun Wong, Tianyin Liu, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum
{"title":"Nonpharmacological Interventions for Chronic Pain in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dara Kiu Yi Leung, Annabelle Pui Chi Fong, Frankie Ho Chun Wong, Tianyin Liu, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Gate control theory and fear-avoidance model of chronic pain posit that biopsychosocial factors can modulate pain. Nonpharmacological interventions are recommended in managing chronic pain, but little information is available regarding their efficacy in older adults. We examined and compared the efficacy of different nonpharmacological intervention approaches for chronic pain management among older adults via meta-analysis and subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO number CRD42020222767), a systematic search was undertaken using MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO up to March 21, 2022. Randomized controlled trials were included, and data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Risk of bias was assessed using a quality rating scale for psychological interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five trials (N = 2,394 participants) were identified. Six types of nonpharmacological interventions were compared with control conditions (sham/attention control and treatment as usual). Nonpharmacological interventions were associated with significant reductions in pain intensity, pain interference, depressive symptoms, catastrophizing beliefs, and improvement in physical performance (standardized mean differences -0.34 to 0.54). Subgroup analyses based on different nonpharmacological approaches revealed the benefits of psychological approaches combined with physical activity.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Nonpharmacological interventions, particularly those adopting psychological approaches and physical activity, have a small but statistically significant effect on chronic pain management in older adults. Reduction in pain interference may be related to reduced catastrophizing beliefs, thus providing support for the fear-avoidance model. Further research with adequate power is needed to establish the efficacy and mechanism of various intervention modalities for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Gate control theory and fear-avoidance model of chronic pain posit that biopsychosocial factors can modulate pain. Nonpharmacological interventions are recommended in managing chronic pain, but little information is available regarding their efficacy in older adults. We examined and compared the efficacy of different nonpharmacological intervention approaches for chronic pain management among older adults via meta-analysis and subgroup analysis.

Research design and methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO number CRD42020222767), a systematic search was undertaken using MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO up to March 21, 2022. Randomized controlled trials were included, and data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Risk of bias was assessed using a quality rating scale for psychological interventions.

Results: Twenty-five trials (N = 2,394 participants) were identified. Six types of nonpharmacological interventions were compared with control conditions (sham/attention control and treatment as usual). Nonpharmacological interventions were associated with significant reductions in pain intensity, pain interference, depressive symptoms, catastrophizing beliefs, and improvement in physical performance (standardized mean differences -0.34 to 0.54). Subgroup analyses based on different nonpharmacological approaches revealed the benefits of psychological approaches combined with physical activity.

Discussion and implications: Nonpharmacological interventions, particularly those adopting psychological approaches and physical activity, have a small but statistically significant effect on chronic pain management in older adults. Reduction in pain interference may be related to reduced catastrophizing beliefs, thus providing support for the fear-avoidance model. Further research with adequate power is needed to establish the efficacy and mechanism of various intervention modalities for older adults.

老年人慢性疼痛的非药物干预:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景和目的:慢性疼痛的门控理论和恐惧-回避模型认为,生物心理社会因素可以调节疼痛。非药物干预被推荐用于控制慢性疼痛,但有关其对老年人疗效的信息却很少。我们通过荟萃分析和亚组分析,研究并比较了不同非药物干预方法对老年人慢性疼痛管理的疗效:按照 PRISMA 指南(PROSPERO 编号 CRD42020222767),使用 MEDLINE、Embase 和 PsycINFO 对截至 2022 年 3 月 21 日的研究进行了系统检索。纳入了随机对照试验,并使用随机效应荟萃分析模型对数据进行了汇总。采用心理干预质量评级表对偏倚风险进行评估:确定了 25 项试验(N = 2394 名参与者)。六种非药物干预与对照条件(假性/注意对照和照常治疗)进行了比较。非药物干预可显著降低疼痛强度、疼痛干扰、抑郁症状和灾难化信念,并改善体能表现(标准化平均差 [SMD] -0.34 至 0.54)。根据不同的非药物疗法进行的分组分析表明,心理疗法与体育锻炼相结合可带来更多益处:非药物干预措施,尤其是采用心理方法和体育锻炼的干预措施,对老年人慢性疼痛的控制有微小但有统计学意义的影响。疼痛干扰的减少可能与灾难化信念的减少有关,从而为恐惧-逃避模型提供了支持。要确定针对老年人的各种干预方式的效果和机制,还需要进行更多有足够力量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信