Geographic inequalities in need and provision of social prescribing link workers a retrospective study in primary care.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Print Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2023.0602
Anna Wilding, Matthew Sutton, Efundem Agboraw, Luke Munford, Paul Wilson
{"title":"Geographic inequalities in need and provision of social prescribing link workers a retrospective study in primary care.","authors":"Anna Wilding, Matthew Sutton, Efundem Agboraw, Luke Munford, Paul Wilson","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2023.0602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term health conditions are major challenges for care systems. Social prescribing link workers have been introduced via primary care networks (PCNs) across England since 2019 to address the wider determinants of health by connecting individuals to activities, groups, or services within their local community.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether the rollout of social prescribing link workers was in areas with the highest need.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective study of social prescribing link workers in England from 2019 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Workforce, population, survey, and area-level data at the PCN-level from April 2020 to October 2023 were combined. Population need before the rollout of link workers was measured using reported lack of support from local services in the 2019 General Practice Patient Survey. To assess if rollout reflected need, linear regression was used to relate provision of link workers (measured by full-time equivalent [FTE] per 10 000 patients) in each quarter to population need for support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Populations in urban, more deprived areas and with higher proportions of people from minority ethnic groups had the highest reported lack of support. Geographically these were in the North West and London. Initially, there was no association between need and provision; then from July 2022, this became negative and significant. By October 2023, a 10-percentage point higher need for support was associated with a 0.035 (95% confidence interval = -0.634 to -0.066) lower FTE per 10 000 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rollout of link workers has not been sufficiently targeted at areas with the highest need. Future deployments should be targeted at those areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e784-e790"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term health conditions are major challenges for care systems. Social prescribing link workers have been introduced via primary care networks (PCNs) across England since 2019 to address the wider determinants of health by connecting individuals to activities, groups, or services within their local community.

Aim: To assess whether the rollout of social prescribing link workers was in areas with the highest need.

Design and setting: A retrospective study of social prescribing link workers in England from 2019 to 2023.

Method: Workforce, population, survey, and area-level data at the PCN-level from April 2020 to October 2023 were combined. Population need before the rollout of link workers was measured using reported lack of support from local services in the 2019 General Practice Patient Survey. To assess if rollout reflected need, linear regression was used to relate provision of link workers (measured by full-time equivalent [FTE] per 10 000 patients) in each quarter to population need for support.

Results: Populations in urban, more deprived areas and with higher proportions of people from minority ethnic groups had the highest reported lack of support. Geographically these were in the North West and London. Initially, there was no association between need and provision; then from July 2022, this became negative and significant. By October 2023, a 10-percentage point higher need for support was associated with a 0.035 (95% confidence interval = -0.634 to -0.066) lower FTE per 10 000 patients.

Conclusion: Rollout of link workers has not been sufficiently targeted at areas with the highest need. Future deployments should be targeted at those areas.

需求和提供社会处方联系工作者方面的地域不平等。
背景:长期健康状况是护理系统面临的主要挑战。自 2019 年起,英格兰各地通过初级医疗网络(PCN)引入了社会处方链接工作者,通过将个人与当地社区内的活动、团体或服务联系起来,来解决更广泛的健康决定因素:对 2019 年至 2023 年期间英格兰的社会处方链接工作者进行回顾性研究:我们结合了 2020 年 4 月至 2023 年 10 月 PCN 级别的劳动力、人口、调查和地区数据。我们利用 2019 年全科医生患者调查中报告的缺乏当地服务支持的情况来衡量推广链接工作者之前的人口需求。为评估推广是否反映了需求,我们使用线性回归法将每个季度提供的链接工作者(按每万名患者的全职当量(FTE)衡量)与人口的支持需求联系起来:结果:城市、贫困地区和少数民族比例较高的人群报告的缺乏支持的比例最高。从地理位置上看,这些地区位于西北部和伦敦。最初,需求与支持之间没有关联,但从 2022 年 7 月开始,这种关联变得消极且显著。到 2023 年 10 月,每万名患者对支持的需求每增加 10 个百分点,每万名患者的 FTE 就会减少 0.035(95%CI(-0.634 to -0.066)):结论:联系工作者并未充分针对需求最高的地区进行推广。今后的部署应针对这些地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信