Participation des acteurs, pratiques de chercheurs.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sante Publique Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Cynthia Morgny, Florent Schepens, Maylis Sposito-Tourier
{"title":"Participation des acteurs, pratiques de chercheurs.","authors":"Cynthia Morgny, Florent Schepens, Maylis Sposito-Tourier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Professional activity represents an injunction to participate in the collective and sustains our identity. Being deprived of it can lead to social exclusion. At the same time, the injunction to autonomy is prevalent in our society. The disabled person can suffer from social stigmatization and find himself in tension between disability/autonomy/work. Work is then essential to identify oneself as a worker and not as a dependent person.</p><p><strong>Purpose of research: </strong>The participatory research presented has a dual objective: to give a voice to a stigmatized population - disabled workers - and their families; to understand and analyze with them the strategies used to work or remain in employment and the impact of these strategies on health at work and the relationship to risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exchanges between the peer Group and the scientific team enabled us to refine the initial questions, to reformulate analyses, to modify communication supports, to make them more acceptable and accessible. This participatory approach has modified our research practices by guaranteeing that the people concerned by the research become actors in it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For populations suffering from symbolic domination, participatory research makes it possible to restore the confidence of individuals and the legitimacy of experiential knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Professional activity represents an injunction to participate in the collective and sustains our identity. Being deprived of it can lead to social exclusion. At the same time, the injunction to autonomy is prevalent in our society. The disabled person can suffer from social stigmatization and find himself in tension between disability/autonomy/work. Work is then essential to identify oneself as a worker and not as a dependent person.

Purpose of research: The participatory research presented has a dual objective: to give a voice to a stigmatized population - disabled workers - and their families; to understand and analyze with them the strategies used to work or remain in employment and the impact of these strategies on health at work and the relationship to risks.

Results: Exchanges between the peer Group and the scientific team enabled us to refine the initial questions, to reformulate analyses, to modify communication supports, to make them more acceptable and accessible. This participatory approach has modified our research practices by guaranteeing that the people concerned by the research become actors in it.

Conclusions: For populations suffering from symbolic domination, participatory research makes it possible to restore the confidence of individuals and the legitimacy of experiential knowledge.

利益相关者的参与,研究人员的实践。
导言:职业活动是参与集体生活的命令,也是我们身份认同的基础。职业活动被剥夺会导致社会排斥。与此同时,我们的社会中也普遍存在着要求自主的禁令。残疾人可能会受到社会鄙视,并发现自己在残疾/自主/工作之间处于紧张状态。因此,工作对于将自己定位为劳动者而非依赖者至关重要:这项参与性研究具有双重目的:让残疾工人及其家人这一被污名化的群体发出声音;与他们一起了解和分析工作或继续就业的策略,以及这些策略对工作健康的影响和与风险的关系:同行小组与科研团队之间的交流使我们能够完善最初的问题,重新制定分析方法,修改沟通支持,使其更易于接受和使用。这种参与式方法改变了我们的研究实践,保证了与研究有关的人成为研究的参与者:结论:对于遭受象征性统治的人群来说,参与式研究可以恢复个人的信心和经验知识的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信