Entre science et engagement : les défis de la recherche communautaire au sein du réseau Coalition PLUS.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sante Publique Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Nicolas Lorente, Marion Di Ciaccio, Lucas Riegel, Lisa Kretzer, Annabelle Niyongabo, B Diane G Dondbzanga, Othmane Bourhaba, Océane Appfel Font, Cristina Iova, Bruno Spire, Jordi Casabona, Rosemary M Delabre, Daniela Rojas Castro
{"title":"Entre science et engagement : les défis de la recherche communautaire au sein du réseau Coalition PLUS.","authors":"Nicolas Lorente, Marion Di Ciaccio, Lucas Riegel, Lisa Kretzer, Annabelle Niyongabo, B Diane G Dondbzanga, Othmane Bourhaba, Océane Appfel Font, Cristina Iova, Bruno Spire, Jordi Casabona, Rosemary M Delabre, Daniela Rojas Castro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-based research, that is, the meaningful involvement of affected populations in the production of scientific knowledge that concerns them, is a political struggle and an ethical necessity. Coalition PLUS, an international network of organizations (most of them NGOs) fighting against HIV and hepatitis, created a community-based research laboratory (CBRL) composed of people from more than sixteen countries and various disciplinary fields. The objectives of the CBLR are to build research capacity, ensure collaboration with local and international academic research centers, and develop international research projects. The CBRL acts as a bridge between different partners, reconciling sometimes divergent interests, and must provide mediation and support to promote dialogue, transparency, and a relationship of trust between the communities and academic researchers. However, the need for scientific legitimacy obliges us to continuously seek a balance between responding to the needs of the field and using rigorous scientific methods, while optimizing and prioritizing existing resources. The permanent quest for this balance has led the CBRL to reorganize its mode of operation to optimize existing synergies with academic research laboratories, with a view to asserting its scientific legitimacy and continuing to contribute to social transformation through community-based research that is both innovative and of high quality. This paper provides a critical reflection on the issues, challenges, practices, and solutions of community-based research within the Coalition PLUS network.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community-based research, that is, the meaningful involvement of affected populations in the production of scientific knowledge that concerns them, is a political struggle and an ethical necessity. Coalition PLUS, an international network of organizations (most of them NGOs) fighting against HIV and hepatitis, created a community-based research laboratory (CBRL) composed of people from more than sixteen countries and various disciplinary fields. The objectives of the CBLR are to build research capacity, ensure collaboration with local and international academic research centers, and develop international research projects. The CBRL acts as a bridge between different partners, reconciling sometimes divergent interests, and must provide mediation and support to promote dialogue, transparency, and a relationship of trust between the communities and academic researchers. However, the need for scientific legitimacy obliges us to continuously seek a balance between responding to the needs of the field and using rigorous scientific methods, while optimizing and prioritizing existing resources. The permanent quest for this balance has led the CBRL to reorganize its mode of operation to optimize existing synergies with academic research laboratories, with a view to asserting its scientific legitimacy and continuing to contribute to social transformation through community-based research that is both innovative and of high quality. This paper provides a critical reflection on the issues, challenges, practices, and solutions of community-based research within the Coalition PLUS network.

在科学与承诺之间:PLUS 联盟网络内社区研究面临的挑战。
以社区为基础的研究,即让受影响人群切实参与到与他们相关的科学知识的生产中来,是一种政治斗争,也是一种伦理需要。PLUS 联盟是一个防治艾滋病毒和肝炎的国际组织网络(其中大多数是非政府组织),它创建了一个社区研究实验室(CBRL),由来自 16 个以上国家和不同学科领域的人员组成。社区研究实验室的目标是提高研究能力,确保与当地和国际学术研究中心的合作,并开发国际研究项目。CBRL 在不同的合作伙伴之间发挥着桥梁作用,调和有时存在的利益分歧,并必须提供调解和支持,以促进社区与学术研究人员之间的对话、透明度和信任关系。然而,对科学合法性的需求迫使我们不断寻求平衡,既要满足实地需求,又要采用严谨的科学方法,同时还要优化现有资源并确定其优先次序。对这一平衡的不懈追求促使社区研究实验室重组其运作模式,优化与学术研究实验室的现有协同作用,以维护其科学合法性,并继续通过基于社区的创新和高质量研究为社会变革做出贡献。本文对 PLUS 联盟网络内社区研究的问题、挑战、实践和解决方案进行了批判性思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信