Experimental and Modeled Assessment of Interventions to Reduce PM2.5 in a Residence during a Wildfire Event.

Pollutants Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-28 DOI:10.3390/pollutants4010003
Chrissi Antonopoulos, H E Dillon, Elliott Gall
{"title":"Experimental and Modeled Assessment of Interventions to Reduce <i>PM</i><sub>2.5</sub> in a Residence during a Wildfire Event.","authors":"Chrissi Antonopoulos, H E Dillon, Elliott Gall","doi":"10.3390/pollutants4010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasingly large and frequent wildfires affect air quality even indoors by emitting and dispersing fine/ultrafine particulate matter known to pose health risks to residents. With this health threat, we are working to help the building science community develop simplified tools that may be used to estimate impacts to large numbers of homes based on high-level housing characteristics. In addition to reviewing literature sources, we performed an experiment to evaluate interventions to mitigate degraded indoor air quality. We instrumented one residence for one week during an extreme wildfire event in the Pacific Northwest. Outdoor ambient concentrations of <i>PM</i><sub>2.5</sub> reached historic levels, sustained at over 200 μg/m<sup>3</sup> for multiple days. Outdoor and indoor <i>PM</i><sub>2.5</sub> were monitored, and data regarding building characteristics, infiltration, and mechanical system operation were gathered to be consistent with the type of information commonly known for residential energy models. Two conditions were studied: a high-capture minimum efficiency rated value (MERV 13) filter integrated into a central forced air (CFA) system, and a CFA with MERV 13 filtration operating with a portable air cleaner (PAC). With intermittent CFA operation and no PAC, indoor corrected concentrations of <i>PM</i><sub>2.5</sub> reached 280 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, and indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios reached a mean of 0.55. The measured I/O ratio was reduced to a mean of 0.22 when both intermittent CFA and the PAC were in operation. Data gathered from the test home were used in a modeling exercise to assess expected I/O ratios from both interventions. The mean modeled I/O ratio for the CFA with an MERV 13 filter was 0.48, and 0.28 when the PAC was added. The model overpredicted the MERV 13 performance and underpredicted the CFA with an MERV 13 filter plus a PAC, though both conditions were predicted within 0.15 standard deviation. The results illustrate the ways that models can be used to estimate indoor <i>PM</i><sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in residences during extreme wildfire smoke events.</p>","PeriodicalId":516868,"journal":{"name":"Pollutants","volume":"4 1","pages":"26-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10863606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pollutants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pollutants4010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasingly large and frequent wildfires affect air quality even indoors by emitting and dispersing fine/ultrafine particulate matter known to pose health risks to residents. With this health threat, we are working to help the building science community develop simplified tools that may be used to estimate impacts to large numbers of homes based on high-level housing characteristics. In addition to reviewing literature sources, we performed an experiment to evaluate interventions to mitigate degraded indoor air quality. We instrumented one residence for one week during an extreme wildfire event in the Pacific Northwest. Outdoor ambient concentrations of PM2.5 reached historic levels, sustained at over 200 μg/m3 for multiple days. Outdoor and indoor PM2.5 were monitored, and data regarding building characteristics, infiltration, and mechanical system operation were gathered to be consistent with the type of information commonly known for residential energy models. Two conditions were studied: a high-capture minimum efficiency rated value (MERV 13) filter integrated into a central forced air (CFA) system, and a CFA with MERV 13 filtration operating with a portable air cleaner (PAC). With intermittent CFA operation and no PAC, indoor corrected concentrations of PM2.5 reached 280 μg/m3, and indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios reached a mean of 0.55. The measured I/O ratio was reduced to a mean of 0.22 when both intermittent CFA and the PAC were in operation. Data gathered from the test home were used in a modeling exercise to assess expected I/O ratios from both interventions. The mean modeled I/O ratio for the CFA with an MERV 13 filter was 0.48, and 0.28 when the PAC was added. The model overpredicted the MERV 13 performance and underpredicted the CFA with an MERV 13 filter plus a PAC, though both conditions were predicted within 0.15 standard deviation. The results illustrate the ways that models can be used to estimate indoor PM2.5 concentrations in residences during extreme wildfire smoke events.

对野火事件中降低住宅 PM2.5 的干预措施进行实验和模型评估。
规模越来越大、频率越来越高的野火甚至会影响室内的空气质量,因为野火会释放和散播细微/超细颗粒物,已知会对居民的健康造成危害。面对这一健康威胁,我们正努力帮助建筑科学界开发简化工具,用于根据高层住宅的特征估算对大量住宅的影响。除了查阅文献资料,我们还进行了一项实验,以评估缓解室内空气质量下降的干预措施。在西北太平洋地区的一次极端野火事件中,我们对一处住宅进行了为期一周的监测。室外环境中的 PM2.5 浓度达到了历史最高水平,连续多日超过 200 微克/立方米。对室外和室内的 PM2.5 进行了监测,并收集了有关建筑特征、渗透和机械系统运行的数据,使其与住宅能源模型中常见的信息类型保持一致。研究了两种情况:一种是在中央强制通风(CFA)系统中集成了一个高捕获最低效率额定值(MERV 13)过滤器,另一种是带有 MERV 13 过滤功能的中央强制通风系统与便携式空气净化器(PAC)一起运行。在中央强制通风系统间歇运行且无 PAC 的情况下,PM2.5 的室内修正浓度达到 280 μg/m3,室内/室外 (I/O) 比率的平均值为 0.55。当间歇性 CFA 和空调同时运行时,测得的 I/O 比率平均值降至 0.22。从测试家庭收集的数据被用于建模工作,以评估两种干预措施的预期 I/O 比率。使用 MERV 13 过滤器的 CFA 的平均模型输入/输出比为 0.48,而添加 PAC 时为 0.28。模型对 MERV 13 性能的预测过高,而对采用 MERV 13 过滤器加 PAC 的 CFA 的预测过低,尽管两种情况的预测都在 0.15 标准差之内。这些结果说明了在极端野火烟雾事件中,模型可用于估算住宅室内 PM2.5 浓度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信