[Redirection of patients from the emergency department to ambulatory care: a feasibility study].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1055/a-2206-1738
Lea Koech, Sarah Ströhl, Michael Lauerer, Sarah Oslislo, Michael Bayeff-Filloff, Reno Thoß, Eckhardt Nagel, Sebastian Carnarius, Dominik Stillfried
{"title":"[Redirection of patients from the emergency department to ambulatory care: a feasibility study].","authors":"Lea Koech, Sarah Ströhl, Michael Lauerer, Sarah Oslislo, Michael Bayeff-Filloff, Reno Thoß, Eckhardt Nagel, Sebastian Carnarius, Dominik Stillfried","doi":"10.1055/a-2206-1738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>§ 120 para. 3b SGB V mandates the Federal Joint Committee to define guidelines for the initial assessment of self-referred walk-in patients as well as for the redirection of patients who can be treated by office-based physicians. A corresponding streaming and redirection process was tested in a feasibility study at the RoMed Clinic Rosenheim.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For the duration of the study, triage nurses of the emergency department (ED) first assessed self-referred walk-in patients with the Manchester Triage System (MTS). Patients in categories green and blue who did not obviously need the ED's resources were additionally assessed by health professionals of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Bavaria using the software Structured Initial Medical Assessment in Germany (SmED). Patients with a recommendation for non-hospital medical treatment were streamed to the out-of-hours practice on campus or were redirected to a physician office after video consultation with an office-based physician. Patient pathways were documented and a qualitative survey using semistructured guided interviews of all stakeholder groups was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,091 self-referred walk-in patients were included. Direct streaming to the ED occurred in 525 cases,13 refused to participate. Based on SmED, 24 additional patients were referred to the ED, 514 patients were streamed to the out-of-hours practice, 23 received a video consultation and five left the ED. After video consultation, eight patients were redirected to a physician's office, 10 were discharged, and five referred to the ED of which one did not want an office-based physician. No returnees from practices to the ED were identified. Generally, the redirection process was evaluated positively in the interviews (n=18). In particular, potential for technical improvement was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the results indicate the feasibility of the redirection process and high acceptance levels. Using SmED in addition to MTS appeared useful before redirection but not necessary for streaming on campus. Redirection to physician offices can help reduce strain on the ED when the out-of-hours practice is not operating. In addition to arranging acute care appointments, video consultations offer an additional potential to treat patients. In a follow-up study, a broader range of patients should be included and appropriateness of redirection decisions should be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2206-1738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: § 120 para. 3b SGB V mandates the Federal Joint Committee to define guidelines for the initial assessment of self-referred walk-in patients as well as for the redirection of patients who can be treated by office-based physicians. A corresponding streaming and redirection process was tested in a feasibility study at the RoMed Clinic Rosenheim.

Materials and methods: For the duration of the study, triage nurses of the emergency department (ED) first assessed self-referred walk-in patients with the Manchester Triage System (MTS). Patients in categories green and blue who did not obviously need the ED's resources were additionally assessed by health professionals of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Bavaria using the software Structured Initial Medical Assessment in Germany (SmED). Patients with a recommendation for non-hospital medical treatment were streamed to the out-of-hours practice on campus or were redirected to a physician office after video consultation with an office-based physician. Patient pathways were documented and a qualitative survey using semistructured guided interviews of all stakeholder groups was carried out.

Results: 1,091 self-referred walk-in patients were included. Direct streaming to the ED occurred in 525 cases,13 refused to participate. Based on SmED, 24 additional patients were referred to the ED, 514 patients were streamed to the out-of-hours practice, 23 received a video consultation and five left the ED. After video consultation, eight patients were redirected to a physician's office, 10 were discharged, and five referred to the ED of which one did not want an office-based physician. No returnees from practices to the ED were identified. Generally, the redirection process was evaluated positively in the interviews (n=18). In particular, potential for technical improvement was identified.

Conclusion: Overall, the results indicate the feasibility of the redirection process and high acceptance levels. Using SmED in addition to MTS appeared useful before redirection but not necessary for streaming on campus. Redirection to physician offices can help reduce strain on the ED when the out-of-hours practice is not operating. In addition to arranging acute care appointments, video consultations offer an additional potential to treat patients. In a follow-up study, a broader range of patients should be included and appropriateness of redirection decisions should be evaluated.

[将急诊科病人转至非住院治疗:可行性研究]。
背景§ 120 para.SGB V 第 3b 条规定,联邦联合委员会应制定对自行转诊的门诊病人进行初步评估的指导原则,以及对可由门诊医生治疗的病人进行转诊的指导原则。罗森海姆 RoMed 诊所在一项可行性研究中对相应的分流和转诊流程进行了测试:在研究期间,急诊科(ED)的分诊护士首先使用曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)对自我转诊的门诊病人进行评估。此外,巴伐利亚州法定医疗保险医师协会的专业医护人员也会使用德国结构化初步医疗评估(SmED)软件,对不明显需要急诊科资源的绿色和蓝色类别患者进行评估。建议进行非医院治疗的患者被分流到校园内的非营业时间诊所,或在与诊所医生进行视频会诊后被转到医生办公室。对患者的就医路径进行了记录,并对所有利益相关群体进行了半结构化引导访谈的定性调查:结果:共纳入 1,091 名自行转诊的门诊患者。有 525 例患者直接到急诊室就诊,13 例拒绝参与。在 SmED 的基础上,又有 24 名患者被转诊至急诊室,514 名患者被分流至非营业时间诊所,23 名患者接受了视频会诊,5 名患者离开了急诊室。视频会诊后,8 名患者被转至医生办公室,10 名患者出院,5 名患者被转至急诊室,其中 1 名患者不希望在办公室就诊。没有发现从诊所返回急诊室的患者。总体而言,转诊流程在访谈中得到了积极评价(18 人)。特别是发现了技术改进的潜力:总体而言,结果表明转诊过程是可行的,接受程度也很高。在重定向之前,除了 MTS 之外,使用 SmED 似乎也很有用,但对于校园内的分流则并非必要。将病人转至医生诊室有助于在非工作时间诊疗不开展时减轻急诊室的压力。除了安排急诊预约外,视频会诊还为治疗病人提供了额外的可能性。在后续研究中,应纳入更广泛的患者,并对转诊决定的适当性进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信