Collared versus collarless hydroxyapatite-coated stems for primary cementless total hip arthroplasty; a systematic review of comparative studies. Is there any difference in survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes?

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
SICOT-J Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2024003
Vasileios Giovanoulis, Eustathios Kenanidis, Florence Aïm, Zakareya Gamie, Simon Marmor, Michael Potoupnis, Sébastien Lustig, Eleftherios Tsiridis
{"title":"Collared versus collarless hydroxyapatite-coated stems for primary cementless total hip arthroplasty; a systematic review of comparative studies. Is there any difference in survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes?","authors":"Vasileios Giovanoulis, Eustathios Kenanidis, Florence Aïm, Zakareya Gamie, Simon Marmor, Michael Potoupnis, Sébastien Lustig, Eleftherios Tsiridis","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aims to critically assess the literature comparative studies investigating collared and collarless Corail stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to find differences in revision rates, radiographic and clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications between these two types of the same stem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies were found by searching PubMed, Science Direct/Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from conception till May 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The investigation encompassed randomized controlled trials, case series, comparative, cohort, and observational studies that assessed at least one comparative outcome or complication between collared and collarless Corail stems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve comparative studies with 90,626 patients undergoing primary THA were included. There were 40,441 collared and 58,543 collarless stems. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 360 months. Our study demonstrated no significant difference in stem revision relative risk (RR = 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23, 2.02; p = 0.49), number of radiolucent lines (RR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.06, 2.28; p = 0.29) and overall complication risk (RR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.22, 1.76; p = 0.37) between collared and collarless stems. The collared stems demonstrated significantly lesser subsidence (mean difference: 1.01 mm; 95% CI, -1.77, -0.25; p = 0.009) and risk of periprosthetic fractures (RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.92; p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comparative studies between collared and collarless stem groups showed similar survival and overall complication rates and functional outcomes. The similar revision rates between groups make the impact of higher subsidence for collarless stems uncertain. The lower risk of periprosthetic fractures in the collared stems group must be clarified further but could be related to increased rotational stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10868518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review aims to critically assess the literature comparative studies investigating collared and collarless Corail stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to find differences in revision rates, radiographic and clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications between these two types of the same stem.

Methods: Eligible studies were found by searching PubMed, Science Direct/Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from conception till May 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The investigation encompassed randomized controlled trials, case series, comparative, cohort, and observational studies that assessed at least one comparative outcome or complication between collared and collarless Corail stems.

Results: Twelve comparative studies with 90,626 patients undergoing primary THA were included. There were 40,441 collared and 58,543 collarless stems. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 360 months. Our study demonstrated no significant difference in stem revision relative risk (RR = 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23, 2.02; p = 0.49), number of radiolucent lines (RR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.06, 2.28; p = 0.29) and overall complication risk (RR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.22, 1.76; p = 0.37) between collared and collarless stems. The collared stems demonstrated significantly lesser subsidence (mean difference: 1.01 mm; 95% CI, -1.77, -0.25; p = 0.009) and risk of periprosthetic fractures (RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.92; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: The comparative studies between collared and collarless stem groups showed similar survival and overall complication rates and functional outcomes. The similar revision rates between groups make the impact of higher subsidence for collarless stems uncertain. The lower risk of periprosthetic fractures in the collared stems group must be clarified further but could be related to increased rotational stability.

初级无骨水泥全髋关节置换术中有领与无领羟基磷灰石涂层柄;对比研究的系统性综述。在存活率、功能和放射学结果方面是否存在差异?
简介:本系统性综述旨在批判性地评估研究初级全髋关节置换术(THA)中有领和无领Corail柄的文献比较研究,以发现同一种柄的两种类型在翻修率、放射学和临床结果以及术后并发症方面的差异:方法:通过搜索PubMed、Science Direct/Scopus和Cochrane系统性综述数据库(Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)中从概念到2023年5月的符合条件的研究。研究遵循 PRISMA 指南。调查包括随机对照试验、病例系列、比较、队列和观察性研究,这些研究至少评估了有颈圈和无颈圈 Corail 支架之间的一种比较结果或并发症:结果:共纳入了 12 项比较研究,90,626 名患者接受了初级 THA 手术。其中有领支架40,441例,无领支架58,543例。随访时间从12个月到360个月不等。我们的研究表明,有领和无领骨干在骨干翻修相对风险(RR = 0.68;95% 置信区间(CI),0.23,2.02;P = 0.49)、放射线数量(RR = 0.3;95% CI,0.06,2.28;P = 0.29)和总体并发症风险(RR = 0.62;95% CI,0.22,1.76;P = 0.37)方面无明显差异。有领骨干的下沉率(平均差异:1.01 mm; 95% CI, -1.77, -0.25; p = 0.009)和假体周围骨折风险(RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.92; p = 0.03)明显低于无领骨干:有领和无领骨干组的比较研究显示了相似的存活率、总体并发症发生率和功能预后。各组间相似的翻修率使得无领骨干较高的下沉率的影响变得不确定。有领骨干组发生假体周围骨折的风险较低,这一点必须进一步澄清,但可能与旋转稳定性增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信