Genome sequencing as a generic diagnostic strategy for rare disease.

IF 10.4 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Gaby Schobers, Ronny Derks, Amber den Ouden, Hilde Swinkels, Jeroen van Reeuwijk, Ermanno Bosgoed, Dorien Lugtenberg, Su Ming Sun, Jordi Corominas Galbany, Marjan Weiss, Marinus J Blok, Richelle A C M Olde Keizer, Tom Hofste, Debby Hellebrekers, Nicole de Leeuw, Alexander Stegmann, Erik-Jan Kamsteeg, Aimee D C Paulussen, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Xiangqun Zheng Bradley, John Peden, Alejandra Gutierrez, Adam Pullen, Tom Payne, Christian Gilissen, Arthur van den Wijngaard, Han G Brunner, Marcel Nelen, Helger G Yntema, Lisenka E L M Vissers
{"title":"Genome sequencing as a generic diagnostic strategy for rare disease.","authors":"Gaby Schobers, Ronny Derks, Amber den Ouden, Hilde Swinkels, Jeroen van Reeuwijk, Ermanno Bosgoed, Dorien Lugtenberg, Su Ming Sun, Jordi Corominas Galbany, Marjan Weiss, Marinus J Blok, Richelle A C M Olde Keizer, Tom Hofste, Debby Hellebrekers, Nicole de Leeuw, Alexander Stegmann, Erik-Jan Kamsteeg, Aimee D C Paulussen, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Xiangqun Zheng Bradley, John Peden, Alejandra Gutierrez, Adam Pullen, Tom Payne, Christian Gilissen, Arthur van den Wijngaard, Han G Brunner, Marcel Nelen, Helger G Yntema, Lisenka E L M Vissers","doi":"10.1186/s13073-024-01301-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To diagnose the full spectrum of hereditary and congenital diseases, genetic laboratories use many different workflows, ranging from karyotyping to exome sequencing. A single generic high-throughput workflow would greatly increase efficiency. We assessed whether genome sequencing (GS) can replace these existing workflows aimed at germline genetic diagnosis for rare disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed short-read GS (NovaSeq™6000; 150 bp paired-end reads, 37 × mean coverage) on 1000 cases with 1271 known clinically relevant variants, identified across different workflows, representative of our tertiary diagnostic centers. Variants were categorized into small variants (single nucleotide variants and indels < 50 bp), large variants (copy number variants and short tandem repeats) and other variants (structural variants and aneuploidies). Variant calling format files were queried per variant, from which workflow-specific true positive rates (TPRs) for detection were determined. A TPR of ≥ 98% was considered the threshold for transition to GS. A GS-first scenario was generated for our laboratory, using diagnostic efficacy and predicted false negative as primary outcome measures. As input, we modeled the diagnostic path for all 24,570 individuals referred in 2022, combining the clinical referral, the transition of the underlying workflow(s) to GS, and the variant type(s) to be detected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 95% (1206/1271) of variants were detected. Detection rates differed per variant category: small variants in 96% (826/860), large variants in 93% (341/366), and other variants in 87% (39/45). TPRs varied between workflows (79-100%), with 7/10 being replaceable by GS. Models for our laboratory indicate that a GS-first strategy would be feasible for 84.9% of clinical referrals (750/883), translating to 71% of all individuals (17,444/24,570) receiving GS as their primary test. An estimated false negative rate of 0.3% could be expected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GS can capture clinically relevant germline variants in a 'GS-first strategy' for the majority of clinical indications in a genetics diagnostic lab.</p>","PeriodicalId":12645,"journal":{"name":"Genome Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10868087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01301-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To diagnose the full spectrum of hereditary and congenital diseases, genetic laboratories use many different workflows, ranging from karyotyping to exome sequencing. A single generic high-throughput workflow would greatly increase efficiency. We assessed whether genome sequencing (GS) can replace these existing workflows aimed at germline genetic diagnosis for rare disease.

Methods: We performed short-read GS (NovaSeq™6000; 150 bp paired-end reads, 37 × mean coverage) on 1000 cases with 1271 known clinically relevant variants, identified across different workflows, representative of our tertiary diagnostic centers. Variants were categorized into small variants (single nucleotide variants and indels < 50 bp), large variants (copy number variants and short tandem repeats) and other variants (structural variants and aneuploidies). Variant calling format files were queried per variant, from which workflow-specific true positive rates (TPRs) for detection were determined. A TPR of ≥ 98% was considered the threshold for transition to GS. A GS-first scenario was generated for our laboratory, using diagnostic efficacy and predicted false negative as primary outcome measures. As input, we modeled the diagnostic path for all 24,570 individuals referred in 2022, combining the clinical referral, the transition of the underlying workflow(s) to GS, and the variant type(s) to be detected.

Results: Overall, 95% (1206/1271) of variants were detected. Detection rates differed per variant category: small variants in 96% (826/860), large variants in 93% (341/366), and other variants in 87% (39/45). TPRs varied between workflows (79-100%), with 7/10 being replaceable by GS. Models for our laboratory indicate that a GS-first strategy would be feasible for 84.9% of clinical referrals (750/883), translating to 71% of all individuals (17,444/24,570) receiving GS as their primary test. An estimated false negative rate of 0.3% could be expected.

Conclusions: GS can capture clinically relevant germline variants in a 'GS-first strategy' for the majority of clinical indications in a genetics diagnostic lab.

基因组测序作为罕见病的通用诊断策略。
背景:为了诊断各种遗传性和先天性疾病,遗传实验室使用了从核型分析到外显子组测序等多种不同的工作流程。单一通用的高通量工作流程将大大提高效率。我们评估了基因组测序(GS)是否能取代这些现有的工作流程,从而对罕见病进行种系遗传诊断:我们对 1000 个病例进行了短线程基因组测序(NovaSeq™6000;150 bp 成对末端读数,37 × 平均覆盖率),这些病例有 1271 个已知的临床相关变异,这些变异是通过不同的工作流程确定的,代表了我们三级诊断中心的情况。变异分为小变异(单核苷酸变异和嵌合结果):总体而言,95%(1206/1271)的变异被检测到。每个变异类别的检测率不同:小变异占 96%(826/860),大变异占 93%(341/366),其他变异占 87%(39/45)。不同工作流程的 TPR 各不相同(79%-100%),其中 7/10 可由 GS 替代。我们实验室的模型显示,对于 84.9% 的临床转诊患者(750/883)来说,GS 优先策略是可行的,这意味着 71% 的患者(17,444/24,570)将接受 GS 作为主要检测。预计假阴性率为 0.3%:结论:在遗传学诊断实验室的大多数临床适应症中,通过 "GS优先策略",GS可以捕获与临床相关的种系变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genome Medicine
Genome Medicine GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Medicine is an open access journal that publishes outstanding research applying genetics, genomics, and multi-omics to understand, diagnose, and treat disease. Bridging basic science and clinical research, it covers areas such as cancer genomics, immuno-oncology, immunogenomics, infectious disease, microbiome, neurogenomics, systems medicine, clinical genomics, gene therapies, precision medicine, and clinical trials. The journal publishes original research, methods, software, and reviews to serve authors and promote broad interest and importance in the field.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信