Mapping advanced practice nurses' scope of practice, satisfaction, and drivers of role performance.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a000980
Sonja Beckmann, Gabriela Schmid-Mohler, Elisabeth Spichiger, Manuela Eicher, Dunja Nicca, Andrea Ullmann-Bremi, Heidi Petry
{"title":"Mapping advanced practice nurses' scope of practice, satisfaction, and drivers of role performance.","authors":"Sonja Beckmann, Gabriela Schmid-Mohler, Elisabeth Spichiger, Manuela Eicher, Dunja Nicca, Andrea Ullmann-Bremi, Heidi Petry","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a000980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) roles in Switzerland include Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS), Nurse Practitioner (NP) and blended roles. The variety contributes to unclear profiles and scope of practice. <i>Aim:</i> To describe a) the performance of APN tasks according to Hamric's competencies, b) job satisfaction, and c) barriers and facilitators to role performance. <i>Methods:</i> Nationwide cross-sectional survey among clinically working APNs. Inclusion criteria: academic degree, role with advanced nursing competency. Analysis of quantitative and qualitative data using inferential statistics and content analysis. <i>Results:</i> Of the 222 APNs, 49% (n = 108) described themselves as CNSs, 37% (n = 81) as working in a blended role, and 15% (n = 33) as NP. APNs provided the greatest proportion of their tasks in the competency direct clinical practice and the least in ethical decision-making. Group comparisons between roles revealed significant differences in the competencies: direct clinical practice, guidance and coaching, leadership, and evidence-based practice. Job satisfaction was high (76%, n = 165), most often described by the category work content/role (e.g., defined scope of practice). The most frequent barrier to role performance was the category scope of practice (e.g., unclear responsibilities); the most frequent facilitator was the category professional recognition (e.g., respect). <i>Conclusion:</i> The study highlights current APN scope of practice and can support the advancement of the role through clinical practice, educational institutions, and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":"83-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) roles in Switzerland include Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS), Nurse Practitioner (NP) and blended roles. The variety contributes to unclear profiles and scope of practice. Aim: To describe a) the performance of APN tasks according to Hamric's competencies, b) job satisfaction, and c) barriers and facilitators to role performance. Methods: Nationwide cross-sectional survey among clinically working APNs. Inclusion criteria: academic degree, role with advanced nursing competency. Analysis of quantitative and qualitative data using inferential statistics and content analysis. Results: Of the 222 APNs, 49% (n = 108) described themselves as CNSs, 37% (n = 81) as working in a blended role, and 15% (n = 33) as NP. APNs provided the greatest proportion of their tasks in the competency direct clinical practice and the least in ethical decision-making. Group comparisons between roles revealed significant differences in the competencies: direct clinical practice, guidance and coaching, leadership, and evidence-based practice. Job satisfaction was high (76%, n = 165), most often described by the category work content/role (e.g., defined scope of practice). The most frequent barrier to role performance was the category scope of practice (e.g., unclear responsibilities); the most frequent facilitator was the category professional recognition (e.g., respect). Conclusion: The study highlights current APN scope of practice and can support the advancement of the role through clinical practice, educational institutions, and research.

绘制高级执业护士的执业范围、满意度和角色表现驱动因素图。
背景:瑞士的高级实践护士(APN)角色包括临床专科护士(CNS)、执业护士(NP)和混合角色。这些角色的多样性导致护士的简介和执业范围不明确。目的:描述 a) 根据 Hamric 能力标准执行 APN 任务的情况;b) 工作满意度;c) 角色执行的障碍和促进因素。方法:在全国范围内对从事临床工作的全科护士进行横断面调查。纳入标准:学历、具有高级护理能力的角色。使用推理统计和内容分析法对定量和定性数据进行分析。结果:在 222 名全科护士中,49%(n = 108)自称为 CNS,37%(n = 81)自称为混合角色,15%(n = 33)自称为 NP。全科护士在直接临床实践能力方面提供的任务比例最大,在伦理决策方面提供的任务比例最小。不同角色之间的分组比较显示,在直接临床实践、指导与辅导、领导力和循证实践等能力方面存在显著差异。工作满意度很高(76%,n = 165),最常见的是工作内容/角色类别(如明确的实践范围)。最常见的角色履行障碍是实践范围类别(如职责不明确);最常见的促进因素是专业认可类别(如尊重)。结论本研究强调了目前全科护士的执业范围,并可通过临床实践、教育机构和研究支持这一角色的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信