Ethical challenges during critical phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: An interpretive synthesis.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1177/09697330241230684
Ignacio Macpherson, María V Roqué, Luis Echarte, Ignacio Segarra
{"title":"Ethical challenges during critical phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: An interpretive synthesis.","authors":"Ignacio Macpherson, María V Roqué, Luis Echarte, Ignacio Segarra","doi":"10.1177/09697330241230684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the most critical phases of COVID-19 pandemic, dramatic situations were experienced in hospitals and care centers that nurses could hardly verbalize. Especially relevant were deep challenges related to terminal illness, situations of extreme sacrifice, as well as reflections on protective measures mixed with beliefs. We intend to analyze which problems had the greatest impact on professionals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to explore the ultimate basis for action when making decisions and the orientation of their behavior in the face of moral conflicts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The methodological strategy is an interpretive synthesis. Narrative review of academic articles that analyzed ethical dilemmas during the pandemic was carried out by searching five databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Psycinfo, CINHAL, and WOS) between January 2020 and December 2022. Finally, 43 articles were selected.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>Ethical requirements were respected in all study phases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reading and review of the 43 articles initiated the first phase of inductive coding which resulted in 14 initial sub-themes. Based on this structure, a second phase of coding was carried out, giving rise to six categories or emerging themes. To facilitate the process of identifying the central category, the authors agreed to carry out a phase of synthesis, grouping the six themes into three meta-themes: the identification and acceptance of human vulnerability; the discovery of positive paradigms in traumatic situations in society; the prevalence of the common good over the particular interest, as the core structure of any society.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study has shown the need to consider healthcare benevolence as a new dimension of health care upon global vulnerability. Responsibility is required to ensure the well-being of a global society, prioritizing the common good over particular interests and building solutions on solid moral structures. A new ethical landscape is essential, starting with a humanistic curricular training of all healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1646-1660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241230684","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the most critical phases of COVID-19 pandemic, dramatic situations were experienced in hospitals and care centers that nurses could hardly verbalize. Especially relevant were deep challenges related to terminal illness, situations of extreme sacrifice, as well as reflections on protective measures mixed with beliefs. We intend to analyze which problems had the greatest impact on professionals.

Aim: The aim is to explore the ultimate basis for action when making decisions and the orientation of their behavior in the face of moral conflicts.

Method: The methodological strategy is an interpretive synthesis. Narrative review of academic articles that analyzed ethical dilemmas during the pandemic was carried out by searching five databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Psycinfo, CINHAL, and WOS) between January 2020 and December 2022. Finally, 43 articles were selected.

Ethical considerations: Ethical requirements were respected in all study phases.

Results: The reading and review of the 43 articles initiated the first phase of inductive coding which resulted in 14 initial sub-themes. Based on this structure, a second phase of coding was carried out, giving rise to six categories or emerging themes. To facilitate the process of identifying the central category, the authors agreed to carry out a phase of synthesis, grouping the six themes into three meta-themes: the identification and acceptance of human vulnerability; the discovery of positive paradigms in traumatic situations in society; the prevalence of the common good over the particular interest, as the core structure of any society.

Conclusion: The study has shown the need to consider healthcare benevolence as a new dimension of health care upon global vulnerability. Responsibility is required to ensure the well-being of a global society, prioritizing the common good over particular interests and building solutions on solid moral structures. A new ethical landscape is essential, starting with a humanistic curricular training of all healthcare professionals.

COVID-19 大流行关键阶段的伦理挑战:解释性综述。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行的最关键阶段,医院和护理中心经历了护士们难以言表的戏剧性情况。尤其是与绝症有关的深层挑战、极度牺牲的情况以及对保护措施和信念的反思。我们打算分析哪些问题对专业人员的影响最大。目的:旨在探讨专业人员在面对道德冲突时做出决定和行为取向的最终依据:方法策略是解释性综合。通过检索 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间的五个数据库(Pubmed、Scopus、Psycinfo、CINHAL 和 WOS),对分析大流行病期间道德困境的学术文章进行了叙述性综述。最终,43 篇文章入选:所有研究阶段均遵守伦理要求:对这 43 篇文章的阅读和审查启动了第一阶段的归纳编码工作,由此产生了 14 个初始子主题。在这一结构的基础上,进行了第二阶段的编码,产生了六个类别或新出现的主题。为了便于确定核心类别,作者们同意进行一个阶段的综合,将六个主题归纳为三个元主题:识别和接受人类的脆弱性;在社会创伤情况下发现积极的范例;作为任何社会的核心结构,共同利益优先于特殊利益:这项研究表明,有必要将医疗保健仁爱作为全球脆弱性医疗保健的一个新维度。要确保全球社会的福祉,就必须承担起责任,将共同利益置于特殊利益之上,并将解决方案建立在坚实的道德结构之上。从对所有医疗保健专业人员进行人文课程培训开始,新的道德观至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信