Wound, Ischemia, Foot Infection (Wifi) Classification System And Its Predictive Ability Concerning Amputation-Free Survival, Mortality And Major Limb Amputation In A Portuguese Population: A Single Center Experience.

Duarte Gil Alves, Vítor Ferreira, Gabriela Teixeira, João Vasconcelos, Miguel Maia, José Vidoedo, João Almeida Pinto
{"title":"Wound, Ischemia, Foot Infection (Wifi) Classification System And Its Predictive Ability Concerning Amputation-Free Survival, Mortality And Major Limb Amputation In A Portuguese Population: A Single Center Experience.","authors":"Duarte Gil Alves, Vítor Ferreira, Gabriela Teixeira, João Vasconcelos, Miguel Maia, José Vidoedo, João Almeida Pinto","doi":"10.48729/pjctvs.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Commonly used chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) classifications lack granularity and detail to precisely stratify patients according to risk of limb loss, expected revascularization benefit and mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate in a Portuguese population the prognostic value of an updated CLTI classification based on Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) proposed by the Society for Vascular Surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with CLTI submitted to lower limb revascularization from January to December of 2017. All consecutive patients with chronic peripheral artery disease with ischemic rest pain or tissue loss were included. The exclusion criteria were patients with intermittent claudication, vascular trauma, acute ischemia, non-atherosclerotic arterial disease and isolated iliac intervention. The primary end-point was major limb amputation, mortality and amputation-free survival (AFS) at 30 days, 1 year and 2 year follow-up. Secondary end-points were minor amputation, wound healing time (WHT) and rate (WHR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 patients with CLTI were submitted to infra-inguinal revascularization: 91 endovascular and 20 open surgery. After categorizing them according to the WIfI: 20 had stage 1 (18.52%), 29 stage 2 (26.85%), 38 stage 3 (35.19%) and 21 stage 4 (19.44%). Overall mortality rate was 1.8%, 17% and 22.3% at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years follow-up. Major amputation rate was 0.9%, 2.7% and 2.7% at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years follow-up. AFS rate was 97.3%, 82.1%, and 76.8% at 30 days, 1 year, 2 years follow-up. In multi-variable analysis, higher WIfI score was the only predictive factor for mortality and AFS. WIfI 3 and 4 were also associated with increased risk of non-healing ulcer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proved the prognostic value of the WIfI classification in a Portuguese population by showing an association between higher scores and increased mortality, lower AFS and non-healing ulcer.</p>","PeriodicalId":74480,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery","volume":"30 4","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Commonly used chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) classifications lack granularity and detail to precisely stratify patients according to risk of limb loss, expected revascularization benefit and mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate in a Portuguese population the prognostic value of an updated CLTI classification based on Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) proposed by the Society for Vascular Surgery.

Materials and methods: Single-center retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with CLTI submitted to lower limb revascularization from January to December of 2017. All consecutive patients with chronic peripheral artery disease with ischemic rest pain or tissue loss were included. The exclusion criteria were patients with intermittent claudication, vascular trauma, acute ischemia, non-atherosclerotic arterial disease and isolated iliac intervention. The primary end-point was major limb amputation, mortality and amputation-free survival (AFS) at 30 days, 1 year and 2 year follow-up. Secondary end-points were minor amputation, wound healing time (WHT) and rate (WHR).

Results: A total of 111 patients with CLTI were submitted to infra-inguinal revascularization: 91 endovascular and 20 open surgery. After categorizing them according to the WIfI: 20 had stage 1 (18.52%), 29 stage 2 (26.85%), 38 stage 3 (35.19%) and 21 stage 4 (19.44%). Overall mortality rate was 1.8%, 17% and 22.3% at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years follow-up. Major amputation rate was 0.9%, 2.7% and 2.7% at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years follow-up. AFS rate was 97.3%, 82.1%, and 76.8% at 30 days, 1 year, 2 years follow-up. In multi-variable analysis, higher WIfI score was the only predictive factor for mortality and AFS. WIfI 3 and 4 were also associated with increased risk of non-healing ulcer.

Conclusion: This study proved the prognostic value of the WIfI classification in a Portuguese population by showing an association between higher scores and increased mortality, lower AFS and non-healing ulcer.

伤口、缺血、足部感染(Wifi)分类系统及其对葡萄牙人群无截肢存活率、死亡率和主要肢体截肢的预测能力:单中心经验
导言:常用的慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)分类缺乏精细度和细节,无法根据肢体缺失风险、预期血管重建效果和死亡率对患者进行精确分层。本研究的目的是在葡萄牙人群中评估血管外科学会提出的基于伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)的最新 CLTI 分类的预后价值:对2017年1月至12月期间接受下肢血管重建术的连续CLTI患者的前瞻性数据进行单中心回顾性评估。纳入所有伴有缺血性静息痛或组织缺失的慢性外周动脉疾病连续患者。排除标准为间歇性跛行、血管创伤、急性缺血、非动脉粥样硬化性疾病和孤立的髂骨介入治疗患者。主要终点是30天、1年和2年随访时的主要肢体截肢、死亡率和无截肢存活率(AFS)。次要终点为轻微截肢、伤口愈合时间(WHT)和愈合率(WHR):共有111名CLTI患者接受了腹股沟下血管重建术:91人接受了血管内手术,20人接受了开放手术。根据 WIfI 进行分类:20 例为 1 期(18.52%),29 例为 2 期(26.85%),38 例为 3 期(35.19%),21 例为 4 期(19.44%)。在 30 天、1 年和 2 年的随访中,总死亡率分别为 1.8%、17% 和 22.3%。在 30 天、1 年和 2 年的随访中,大截肢率分别为 0.9%、2.7% 和 2.7%。随访30天、1年和2年时的AFS率分别为97.3%、82.1%和76.8%。在多变量分析中,较高的WIfI评分是死亡率和AFS的唯一预测因素。WIfI 3分和4分也与溃疡不愈合风险增加有关:这项研究证明了 WIfI 分级在葡萄牙人群中的预后价值,它显示出较高的分数与死亡率增加、较低的 AFS 和溃疡不愈合之间存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信