Association of Neighborhood Opportunity with Infant Brain Activity and Cognitive Development.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Mei Elansary, Wendy S Wei, Lara J Pierce, Dana C McCoy, Charles A Nelson
{"title":"Association of Neighborhood Opportunity with Infant Brain Activity and Cognitive Development.","authors":"Mei Elansary, Wendy S Wei, Lara J Pierce, Dana C McCoy, Charles A Nelson","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with lower neurocognitive scores and differences in brain structure among school-age children. Associations between positive neighborhood characteristics, infant brain activity, and cognitive development are underexplored. We examined direct and indirect associations between neighborhood opportunity, brain activity, and cognitive development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal cohort study included infants from 2 primary care clinics in Boston and Los Angeles. Using a sample of 65 infants, we estimated path models to examine associations between neighborhood opportunity (measured by the Child Opportunity Index), infant electroencephalography (EEG) at 6 months, and infant cognitive development (measured using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning) at 12 months. A mediation model tested whether EEG power explained associations between neighborhood opportunity and infant cognition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neighborhood opportunity positively predicted infant absolute EEG power across multiple frequency bands: low ( b = 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.24, p = 0.04, = 0.21); high ( b = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.21, p = 0.03, = 0.23); ( b = 0.10, 95% CI 0.00-0.19, p = 0.04, = 0.20); and ( b = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.22, p = 0.02, = 0.24). The results remained statistically significant after applying a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate of 0.10 to adjust for multiple comparisons. No significant associations emerged between neighborhood opportunity, relative EEG power, and infant cognition. Mediation was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neighborhood opportunity is positively associated with some forms of infant brain activity, suggesting that positive neighborhood characteristics may play a salient role in early development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with lower neurocognitive scores and differences in brain structure among school-age children. Associations between positive neighborhood characteristics, infant brain activity, and cognitive development are underexplored. We examined direct and indirect associations between neighborhood opportunity, brain activity, and cognitive development.

Methods: This longitudinal cohort study included infants from 2 primary care clinics in Boston and Los Angeles. Using a sample of 65 infants, we estimated path models to examine associations between neighborhood opportunity (measured by the Child Opportunity Index), infant electroencephalography (EEG) at 6 months, and infant cognitive development (measured using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning) at 12 months. A mediation model tested whether EEG power explained associations between neighborhood opportunity and infant cognition.

Results: Neighborhood opportunity positively predicted infant absolute EEG power across multiple frequency bands: low ( b = 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.24, p = 0.04, = 0.21); high ( b = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.21, p = 0.03, = 0.23); ( b = 0.10, 95% CI 0.00-0.19, p = 0.04, = 0.20); and ( b = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.22, p = 0.02, = 0.24). The results remained statistically significant after applying a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate of 0.10 to adjust for multiple comparisons. No significant associations emerged between neighborhood opportunity, relative EEG power, and infant cognition. Mediation was not significant.

Conclusion: Neighborhood opportunity is positively associated with some forms of infant brain activity, suggesting that positive neighborhood characteristics may play a salient role in early development.

邻里机会与婴儿大脑活动和认知发展的关系。
背景和目的:邻里之间的社会经济劣势与学龄儿童较低的神经认知分数和大脑结构差异有关。积极的邻里特征、婴儿大脑活动和认知发展之间的关系还没有得到充分的研究。我们研究了邻里机会、大脑活动和认知发展之间的直接和间接联系:这项纵向队列研究包括波士顿和洛杉矶两家初级保健诊所的婴儿。我们以 65 名婴儿为样本,估算了路径模型,以检验邻里机会(以儿童机会指数衡量)、6 个月时的婴儿脑电图(EEG)和 12 个月时的婴儿认知发展(以 Mullen 早期学习量表衡量)之间的关联。一个中介模型检验了脑电图功率是否能解释邻里机会与婴儿认知之间的关联:结果:在多个频段上,邻里机会对婴儿绝对脑电图功率有正向预测作用:低(b = 0.12,95% CI 0.01-0.24,p = 0.04,= 0.21);高(b = 0.11,95% CI 0.01-0.21,p = 0.03,= 0.23);(b = 0.10,95% CI 0.00-0.19,p = 0.04,= 0.20);以及(b = 0.12,95% CI 0.02-0.22,p = 0.02,= 0.24)。采用本杰明-霍奇伯格假发现率 0.10 调整多重比较后,结果仍具有统计学意义。在邻里机会、相对脑电图功率和婴儿认知之间没有出现明显的关联。结论结论:邻里机会与某些形式的婴儿大脑活动呈正相关,这表明积极的邻里特征可能在婴儿早期发育中发挥着突出作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信