Evaluation of cost and infusion-related reactions among intravenous trastuzumab, subcutaneous trastuzumab, and trastuzumab biosimilars at an academic medical center.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1177/10781552241231913
Daijah M Davis, Kasey Jackson, Christina Hoppe
{"title":"Evaluation of cost and infusion-related reactions among intravenous trastuzumab, subcutaneous trastuzumab, and trastuzumab biosimilars at an academic medical center.","authors":"Daijah M Davis, Kasey Jackson, Christina Hoppe","doi":"10.1177/10781552241231913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionTrastuzumab is a vital treatment option for human epidermal growth factor 2 positive breast cancer. Since 2017, there have been 5 trastuzumab biosimilars approved for use. Despite hypotheses of infusion-related reactions among intravenous trastuzumab, subcutaneous trastuzumab, and trastuzumab biosimilars, there is minimal available literature comparing these agents. This evaluation will compare the rate of infusion-related reactions among these agents, evaluate our institution's utilization, and compare acquisition costs to determine if there is a potential cost savings by utilizing specific agents as our formulary preferred medication.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed medical records to identify the incidence of infusion-related reaction after administration of intravenous or subcutaneous trastuzumab or trastuzumab biosimilars. Additionally, we conducted a cost analysis to identify potential cost savings by switching to an alternative institutional preferred agent. Infusion chair time was calculated to identify chair time savings with subcutaneous administration.ResultsThere were 183 patients included in this study. Seven patients (3.8%) experienced an infusion-related reaction. The most utilized agent within our cohort was intravenous trastuzumab. During our study period, 181 patients received intravenous infusions, which could allow for substantial infusion chair savings by switching to trastuzumab/hyaluronidase, the subcutaneous formulation. Beyond the chair time, direct drug cost savings were also identified when comparing the costs of each of the evaluated medications.ConclusionSubcutaneous trastuzumab or trastuzumab biosimilars do not pose a greater risk of infusion-related reactions compared to intravenous trastuzumab and may offer more affordable treatment options for breast cancer patients who qualify for trastuzumab therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"224-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241231913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionTrastuzumab is a vital treatment option for human epidermal growth factor 2 positive breast cancer. Since 2017, there have been 5 trastuzumab biosimilars approved for use. Despite hypotheses of infusion-related reactions among intravenous trastuzumab, subcutaneous trastuzumab, and trastuzumab biosimilars, there is minimal available literature comparing these agents. This evaluation will compare the rate of infusion-related reactions among these agents, evaluate our institution's utilization, and compare acquisition costs to determine if there is a potential cost savings by utilizing specific agents as our formulary preferred medication.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed medical records to identify the incidence of infusion-related reaction after administration of intravenous or subcutaneous trastuzumab or trastuzumab biosimilars. Additionally, we conducted a cost analysis to identify potential cost savings by switching to an alternative institutional preferred agent. Infusion chair time was calculated to identify chair time savings with subcutaneous administration.ResultsThere were 183 patients included in this study. Seven patients (3.8%) experienced an infusion-related reaction. The most utilized agent within our cohort was intravenous trastuzumab. During our study period, 181 patients received intravenous infusions, which could allow for substantial infusion chair savings by switching to trastuzumab/hyaluronidase, the subcutaneous formulation. Beyond the chair time, direct drug cost savings were also identified when comparing the costs of each of the evaluated medications.ConclusionSubcutaneous trastuzumab or trastuzumab biosimilars do not pose a greater risk of infusion-related reactions compared to intravenous trastuzumab and may offer more affordable treatment options for breast cancer patients who qualify for trastuzumab therapy.

评估一家学术医疗中心静脉注射曲妥珠单抗、皮下注射曲妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药的成本和输液相关反应。
简介曲妥珠单抗是人类表皮生长因子2阳性乳腺癌的重要治疗选择。自2017年以来,已有5种曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药获批使用。尽管有假设称静脉注射曲妥珠单抗、皮下注射曲妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药会出现输液相关反应,但对这些药物进行比较的文献极少。本次评估将比较这些药物的输液相关反应发生率,评估本机构的使用情况,并比较购置成本,以确定使用特定药物作为我们的处方集首选药物是否有可能节约成本:我们对医疗记录进行了回顾性分析,以确定静脉或皮下注射曲妥珠单抗或曲妥珠单抗生物类似物后输液相关反应的发生率。此外,我们还进行了成本分析,以确定转用其他机构首选药物可能节省的成本。我们还计算了输液椅时间,以确定皮下给药可节省的输液椅时间:本研究共纳入 183 名患者。7 名患者(3.8%)出现了输液相关反应。我们队列中使用最多的药物是静脉注射曲妥珠单抗。在我们的研究期间,有 181 名患者接受了静脉输液,如果改用曲妥珠单抗/透明质酸酶皮下制剂,可以节省大量输液椅时间。除了输液椅时间,在比较每种评估药物的成本时还发现了直接药物成本的节省:结论:与静脉注射曲妥珠单抗相比,皮下注射曲妥珠单抗或曲妥珠单抗生物类似物不会带来更大的输液相关反应风险,可为符合曲妥珠单抗治疗条件的乳腺癌患者提供更经济实惠的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信