Effect of inner diameter, filter length, and pore size on hollow fiber filter fouling during perfusion cell culture

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Dominique WuDunn, Andrea Squeri, Jimmy Vu, Ashna Dhingra, Jon Coffman, Ken Lee
{"title":"Effect of inner diameter, filter length, and pore size on hollow fiber filter fouling during perfusion cell culture","authors":"Dominique WuDunn,&nbsp;Andrea Squeri,&nbsp;Jimmy Vu,&nbsp;Ashna Dhingra,&nbsp;Jon Coffman,&nbsp;Ken Lee","doi":"10.1002/btpr.3440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the need for higher volumetric productivity in biomanufacturing grows, biopharmaceutical companies are increasingly investing in a perfusion cell culture process, most commonly one that uses a hollow fiber filter as the cell retention device. A current challenge with using hollow fiber filters is fouling of the membrane, which reduces product sieving and can increase transmembrane pressure (TMP) past process limitations. In this work, the impact of hollow fiber filter geometries on product sieving and hydraulic membrane resistance profiles is evaluated in a tangential flow filtration (TFF) perfusion system. The hollow fibers tested had lengths ranging from 19.8 to 41.5 cm, inner diameters (IDs) ranging from 1.0 to 2.6 mm, and pore sizes of 0.2 or 0.65 μm. The results showed that the shortest hollow fibers experienced higher product sieving while larger IDs contributed to both higher product sieving and lower hydraulic membrane resistances, illustrating the impact of filter geometry on process performance. The results also showed 0.2 μm pore size filters maintain higher product sieving, but also higher membrane resistances compared to 0.65 μm pore size filters. This study highlights the need for optimized hollow fiber filter geometries to maximize use of the membrane area, which in turn can reduce production costs and increase scalability of the perfusion process.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/btpr.3440","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.3440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the need for higher volumetric productivity in biomanufacturing grows, biopharmaceutical companies are increasingly investing in a perfusion cell culture process, most commonly one that uses a hollow fiber filter as the cell retention device. A current challenge with using hollow fiber filters is fouling of the membrane, which reduces product sieving and can increase transmembrane pressure (TMP) past process limitations. In this work, the impact of hollow fiber filter geometries on product sieving and hydraulic membrane resistance profiles is evaluated in a tangential flow filtration (TFF) perfusion system. The hollow fibers tested had lengths ranging from 19.8 to 41.5 cm, inner diameters (IDs) ranging from 1.0 to 2.6 mm, and pore sizes of 0.2 or 0.65 μm. The results showed that the shortest hollow fibers experienced higher product sieving while larger IDs contributed to both higher product sieving and lower hydraulic membrane resistances, illustrating the impact of filter geometry on process performance. The results also showed 0.2 μm pore size filters maintain higher product sieving, but also higher membrane resistances compared to 0.65 μm pore size filters. This study highlights the need for optimized hollow fiber filter geometries to maximize use of the membrane area, which in turn can reduce production costs and increase scalability of the perfusion process.

Abstract Image

内径、过滤器长度和孔径对灌流细胞培养过程中中空纤维过滤器堵塞的影响。
随着生物制造对更高容积生产力的需求不断增长,生物制药公司越来越多地投资于灌流细胞培养工艺,其中最常见的是使用中空纤维过滤器作为细胞保留装置。使用中空纤维过滤器目前面临的一个挑战是膜结垢,这会降低产品筛分能力,并使跨膜压力(TMP)超过工艺限制。在这项工作中,我们在切向流过滤(TFF)灌注系统中评估了中空纤维过滤器几何形状对产品筛分和水力膜阻力曲线的影响。测试的中空纤维长度从 19.8 厘米到 41.5 厘米不等,内径(ID)从 1.0 毫米到 2.6 毫米不等,孔径为 0.2 或 0.65 微米。结果表明,最短的中空纤维具有更高的产品筛分率,而内径较大的中空纤维则具有更高的产品筛分率和更低的水力膜阻力,这说明了过滤器的几何形状对工艺性能的影响。结果还显示,与 0.65 μm 孔径的过滤器相比,0.2 μm 孔径的过滤器能保持较高的产品筛分率,但也能保持较高的膜阻力。这项研究强调了优化中空纤维过滤器几何形状的必要性,以最大限度地利用膜面积,从而降低生产成本,提高灌注工艺的可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotechnology Progress
Biotechnology Progress 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries. Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信