Efficacy of a smartphone-based Cognitive Bias Modification program for emotion regulation: A randomized-controlled crossover trial

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Fanny Alexandra Dietel , Raphael Rupprecht , Alexander Mohamed Seriyo , Malte Post , Bastian Sudhoff , Jacqueline Reichart , Matthias Berking , Ulrike Buhlmann
{"title":"Efficacy of a smartphone-based Cognitive Bias Modification program for emotion regulation: A randomized-controlled crossover trial","authors":"Fanny Alexandra Dietel ,&nbsp;Raphael Rupprecht ,&nbsp;Alexander Mohamed Seriyo ,&nbsp;Malte Post ,&nbsp;Bastian Sudhoff ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Reichart ,&nbsp;Matthias Berking ,&nbsp;Ulrike Buhlmann","doi":"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has identified maladaptive emotion regulation as a key factor in psychopathology. Thus, addressing emotion regulation via scalable, low-threshold digital interventions – such as smartphone-based Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) – holds important therapeutic potential. Using a randomized-controlled crossover trial, we tested the efficacy of an integrated CBM module within the Affect Regulation Training (ART, i.e., CBM-ART) that targeted emotion regulation through elements of appraisal-based and approach avoidance training.</p><p>Undergraduate students reporting elevated stress were randomized to a one-week active intervention (<em>Mindgames</em>; including psychoeducation, a quiz, and CBM-ART; <em>n</em> = 40), active control training (<em>Emo Shape</em>; including placebo psychoeducation, a quiz, and a placebo swiping task; <em>n</em> <em>=</em> 36) or waitlist (<em>n</em> <em>=</em> 25). Before and after the intervention, we assessed emotion regulation, interpretation bias, stress and depression. We further tested post-training stress reactivity using an anagram task.</p><p>Results indicated that the active intervention improved negative (OR = 0.35) and positive (OR = 2.40) interpretation biases and symptom measures (<em>d</em> = 0.52–0.87). However, active control training showed attenuated concurrent pre-post changes on interpretation biases (i.e., OR = 0.53 for negative, and OR = 1.49 for positive interpretations) and symptom measures (<em>d</em> = 0.26–0.91). The active intervention was rated positively in terms of acceptability and usability.</p><p>These findings provide initial evidence for the efficacy and acceptability of an integrated app-based CBM intervention for emotion regulation in reducing interpretation biases and psychopathological symptoms, including stress. However, future studies should disentangle specific mechanisms underlying interventional effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48615,"journal":{"name":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000125/pdfft?md5=d064f067786e9fe6b866ec352ba74bed&pid=1-s2.0-S2214782924000125-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has identified maladaptive emotion regulation as a key factor in psychopathology. Thus, addressing emotion regulation via scalable, low-threshold digital interventions – such as smartphone-based Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) – holds important therapeutic potential. Using a randomized-controlled crossover trial, we tested the efficacy of an integrated CBM module within the Affect Regulation Training (ART, i.e., CBM-ART) that targeted emotion regulation through elements of appraisal-based and approach avoidance training.

Undergraduate students reporting elevated stress were randomized to a one-week active intervention (Mindgames; including psychoeducation, a quiz, and CBM-ART; n = 40), active control training (Emo Shape; including placebo psychoeducation, a quiz, and a placebo swiping task; n = 36) or waitlist (n = 25). Before and after the intervention, we assessed emotion regulation, interpretation bias, stress and depression. We further tested post-training stress reactivity using an anagram task.

Results indicated that the active intervention improved negative (OR = 0.35) and positive (OR = 2.40) interpretation biases and symptom measures (d = 0.52–0.87). However, active control training showed attenuated concurrent pre-post changes on interpretation biases (i.e., OR = 0.53 for negative, and OR = 1.49 for positive interpretations) and symptom measures (d = 0.26–0.91). The active intervention was rated positively in terms of acceptability and usability.

These findings provide initial evidence for the efficacy and acceptability of an integrated app-based CBM intervention for emotion regulation in reducing interpretation biases and psychopathological symptoms, including stress. However, future studies should disentangle specific mechanisms underlying interventional effects.

基于智能手机的认知偏差修正计划对情绪调节的功效:随机对照交叉试验
以往的研究发现,适应不良的情绪调节是导致精神病理学的一个关键因素。因此,通过可扩展、低门槛的数字化干预措施(如基于智能手机的认知偏差修正(CBM))来解决情绪调节问题具有重要的治疗潜力。通过随机对照交叉试验,我们测试了情绪调节训练(ART,即 CBM-ART)中的 CBM 模块的疗效、报告压力升高的本科生被随机分配到为期一周的积极干预(Mindgames;包括心理教育、小测验和CBM-ART;n = 40)、积极对照训练(Emo Shape;包括安慰剂心理教育、小测验和安慰剂刷卡任务;n = 36)或候补名单(n = 25)中。)在干预前后,我们对情绪调节、解释偏差、压力和抑郁进行了评估。结果表明,积极干预改善了消极(OR = 0.35)和积极(OR = 2.40)解释偏差和症状测量(d = 0.52-0.87)。然而,积极对照组培训在解释偏差(即消极解释的 OR = 0.53 和积极解释的 OR = 1.49)和症状测量(d = 0.26-0.91)方面显示出的前后同步变化有所减弱。这些研究结果提供了初步证据,证明基于应用程序的综合 CBM 情绪调节干预在减少解释偏差和心理病理症状(包括压力)方面的有效性和可接受性。然而,未来的研究还应该对干预效果的具体机制进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.30%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ESRII) and the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII). The aim of Internet Interventions is to publish scientific, peer-reviewed, high-impact research on Internet interventions and related areas. Internet Interventions welcomes papers on the following subjects: • Intervention studies targeting the promotion of mental health and featuring the Internet and/or technologies using the Internet as an underlying technology, e.g. computers, smartphone devices, tablets, sensors • Implementation and dissemination of Internet interventions • Integration of Internet interventions into existing systems of care • Descriptions of development and deployment infrastructures • Internet intervention methodology and theory papers • Internet-based epidemiology • Descriptions of new Internet-based technologies and experiments with clinical applications • Economics of internet interventions (cost-effectiveness) • Health care policy and Internet interventions • The role of culture in Internet intervention • Internet psychometrics • Ethical issues pertaining to Internet interventions and measurements • Human-computer interaction and usability research with clinical implications • Systematic reviews and meta-analysis on Internet interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信