Surgical System Efficiency and Operative Productivity in Public and Private Health Facilities in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Manuel Kassaye Sibhatu, Edlawit Mesfin Getachew, Dawit Yifru Bete, Senedu Bekele Gebreegziabher, Tsegaye Hailu Kumsa, Mulatu Birru Shagre, Kassa Haile Merga, Desalegn Bekele Taye, Hassen Mohammed Bashir, Mikiyas Teferri Yicheneku, Wuletaw Chanie Zewude, Akililu Alemu Ashuro, Tigistu Adamu Ashengo, Berhane Redae Meshesha
{"title":"Surgical System Efficiency and Operative Productivity in Public and Private Health Facilities in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation.","authors":"Manuel Kassaye Sibhatu, Edlawit Mesfin Getachew, Dawit Yifru Bete, Senedu Bekele Gebreegziabher, Tsegaye Hailu Kumsa, Mulatu Birru Shagre, Kassa Haile Merga, Desalegn Bekele Taye, Hassen Mohammed Bashir, Mikiyas Teferri Yicheneku, Wuletaw Chanie Zewude, Akililu Alemu Ashuro, Tigistu Adamu Ashengo, Berhane Redae Meshesha","doi":"10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global and local health organizations track surgical system efficiency to improve surgical system performance using various efficiency metrics, such as operating room (OR) output, surgical incision start time (SIST), turnover time (TOT), cancellation rate among elective surgeries, and in-hospital surgery wait time. We evaluated the surgical system efficiency and factors affecting the efficiency in health facilities across Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study design with retrospective record review was used to evaluate the surgical system efficiency in 163 public and private health facilities in Ethiopia from December 2020 to June 2021. Experienced, trained surgical clinicians abstracted efficiency data from service registers and patient charts using a pretested tool. A bivariable and multivariable regression analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study facilities, 84.11% of the operating tables were functional, and 68,596 major surgeries were performed. The aggregate OR output in both public and private health facilities was 2 surgeries per day per OR table. Operating productivity was shown to be affected by first-case SIST (<i>P</i>=.004). However, of the total 881 surgery incision times audited, 19.86% of the first-of-the-day elective surgeries started after 10:01 am. The SIST was strongly associated with an in-hospital wait time for surgery (<i>P</i>=.016). The elective surgery cancellation rate was 5.2%, and aggregate mean TOT was 50.25 minutes. The mean in-hospital surgery wait time was 45.40 hours, longer than the national cutoff for wait time. In a bivariable analysis, the independent variables that demonstrated association operating room productivity were then inputted into a multivariable regression analysis model. However, none of the predictor/independent variables showed significance in the multivariable regression analysis model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The volume of surgery and overall OR productivity in Ethiopia is low. This calls for concerted action to optimize OR efficiency and improve access to timely and safe surgical care in Ethiopia and other LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Global and local health organizations track surgical system efficiency to improve surgical system performance using various efficiency metrics, such as operating room (OR) output, surgical incision start time (SIST), turnover time (TOT), cancellation rate among elective surgeries, and in-hospital surgery wait time. We evaluated the surgical system efficiency and factors affecting the efficiency in health facilities across Ethiopia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study design with retrospective record review was used to evaluate the surgical system efficiency in 163 public and private health facilities in Ethiopia from December 2020 to June 2021. Experienced, trained surgical clinicians abstracted efficiency data from service registers and patient charts using a pretested tool. A bivariable and multivariable regression analysis was conducted.

Results: In the study facilities, 84.11% of the operating tables were functional, and 68,596 major surgeries were performed. The aggregate OR output in both public and private health facilities was 2 surgeries per day per OR table. Operating productivity was shown to be affected by first-case SIST (P=.004). However, of the total 881 surgery incision times audited, 19.86% of the first-of-the-day elective surgeries started after 10:01 am. The SIST was strongly associated with an in-hospital wait time for surgery (P=.016). The elective surgery cancellation rate was 5.2%, and aggregate mean TOT was 50.25 minutes. The mean in-hospital surgery wait time was 45.40 hours, longer than the national cutoff for wait time. In a bivariable analysis, the independent variables that demonstrated association operating room productivity were then inputted into a multivariable regression analysis model. However, none of the predictor/independent variables showed significance in the multivariable regression analysis model.

Conclusion: The volume of surgery and overall OR productivity in Ethiopia is low. This calls for concerted action to optimize OR efficiency and improve access to timely and safe surgical care in Ethiopia and other LMICs.

埃塞俄比亚公立和私立医疗机构的手术系统效率和手术生产率:横断面评估。
背景:全球和地方医疗机构利用手术室(OR)产出、手术切口开始时间(SIST)、周转时间(TOT)、择期手术取消率和院内手术等待时间等各种效率指标跟踪手术系统效率,以提高手术系统绩效。我们评估了埃塞俄比亚各地医疗机构的手术系统效率以及影响效率的因素:采用横断面研究设计和回顾性记录审查的方法,评估了埃塞俄比亚 163 家公立和私立医疗机构在 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 6 月期间的手术系统效率。经验丰富、训练有素的外科临床医生使用预先测试过的工具从服务登记簿和病历中抽取效率数据。研究结果显示,在研究机构中,84.11%的医疗系统效率高于其他医疗机构:在研究机构中,84.11%的手术台正常运转,共进行了68596例大型手术。公立和私立医疗机构的手术台总产量为每天每台手术台完成 2 例手术。手术生产率受首例 SIST 的影响(P=.004)。然而,在审计的 881 例手术切口时间中,19.86% 的首例择期手术是在上午 10:01 之后开始的。SIST 与院内手术等待时间密切相关(P=.016)。择期手术取消率为 5.2%,总平均 TOT 为 50.25 分钟。平均院内手术等待时间为 45.40 小时,长于国家规定的等待时间临界值。在一项二变量分析中,将与手术室生产率相关的独立变量输入多变量回归分析模型。然而,在多变量回归分析模型中,没有一个预测/独立变量显示出显著性:埃塞俄比亚的手术量和手术室总体生产率都很低。结论:埃塞俄比亚的手术量和手术室的总体生产率都很低,这就要求采取一致行动,优化手术室的效率,改善埃塞俄比亚和其他低收入国家获得及时、安全手术护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信