Evaluating the Development and Application of Stand Density Index for the Management of Complex and Adaptive Forests

IF 9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Emmerson Chivhenge, David G. Ray, Aaron R. Weiskittel, Christopher W. Woodall, Anthony W. D’Amato
{"title":"Evaluating the Development and Application of Stand Density Index for the Management of Complex and Adaptive Forests","authors":"Emmerson Chivhenge, David G. Ray, Aaron R. Weiskittel, Christopher W. Woodall, Anthony W. D’Amato","doi":"10.1007/s40725-024-00212-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>The objective quantification of stand density (SD) is necessary for predicting forest dynamics over space and time. Despite the development of various synthetic representations of SD, consensus remains elusive regarding a primary integrated measure due to contrasting data sources, statistical modeling methods, and distinct regional variations in forest structure and composition. One of the most enduring and robust measures of SD is Reineke’s (1933; J. Ag Res. 46, 627-638) stand density index (SDI), which has long formed the basis for the prediction of stand development concerning self-thinning processes in single-species, even-aged stands and stand density management diagrams (SDMDs). Thus, this review tracks the development of different methodologies and necessary data for properly estimating SDI, including its application in complex forests and adaptive management contexts.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Limitations of SDI in its earliest form have led to important modifications centered on refinement and expanding its application beyond even-aged, single-species stands to multi-cohort, mixed composition stands. Statistical advances for better determination of the maximum size-density boundary line have also been applied to SDI estimates using the ever-expanding availability of remeasured field data including large-scale, national forest inventories. Other innovations include the integration of regional climate information and species functional traits, e.g., wood specific gravity, drought, and shade tolerance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>In this synthesis, we describe the attributes of SDI that have promulgated its use as a leading measure of SD for nearly 90 years. Recent applications of robust statistical techniques such as hierarchical Bayesian methods and linear quantile mixed modeling have emerged as the best performing methods for establishing the maximum size-density boundary, especially those incorporating ancillary variables like climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48653,"journal":{"name":"Current Forestry Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Forestry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-024-00212-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The objective quantification of stand density (SD) is necessary for predicting forest dynamics over space and time. Despite the development of various synthetic representations of SD, consensus remains elusive regarding a primary integrated measure due to contrasting data sources, statistical modeling methods, and distinct regional variations in forest structure and composition. One of the most enduring and robust measures of SD is Reineke’s (1933; J. Ag Res. 46, 627-638) stand density index (SDI), which has long formed the basis for the prediction of stand development concerning self-thinning processes in single-species, even-aged stands and stand density management diagrams (SDMDs). Thus, this review tracks the development of different methodologies and necessary data for properly estimating SDI, including its application in complex forests and adaptive management contexts.

Recent Findings

Limitations of SDI in its earliest form have led to important modifications centered on refinement and expanding its application beyond even-aged, single-species stands to multi-cohort, mixed composition stands. Statistical advances for better determination of the maximum size-density boundary line have also been applied to SDI estimates using the ever-expanding availability of remeasured field data including large-scale, national forest inventories. Other innovations include the integration of regional climate information and species functional traits, e.g., wood specific gravity, drought, and shade tolerance.

Summary

In this synthesis, we describe the attributes of SDI that have promulgated its use as a leading measure of SD for nearly 90 years. Recent applications of robust statistical techniques such as hierarchical Bayesian methods and linear quantile mixed modeling have emerged as the best performing methods for establishing the maximum size-density boundary, especially those incorporating ancillary variables like climate.

Abstract Image

评估林分密度指数在复杂和适应性强的森林管理中的开发和应用
综述目的 林分密度(SD)的客观量化对于预测森林在空间和时间上的动态变化十分必要。尽管已开发出各种 SD 合成表示法,但由于数据来源、统计建模方法以及森林结构和组成的不同区域差异,人们仍无法就主要的综合测量方法达成共识。林分密度指数(SDI)是最持久、最可靠的林分密度测量方法之一,长期以来一直是预测单一树种、均匀年龄林分和林分密度管理图(SDMD)中自稀化过程的林分发展的基础。因此,本综述将跟踪不同方法的发展以及正确估算 SDI 所需的数据,包括其在复杂森林和适应性管理环境中的应用。为了更好地确定最大尺寸-密度边界线,统计方面的进步也被应用到了 SDI 估算中,使用的是不断扩大的重新测量的实地数据,包括大规模的国家森林资源清查。其他创新还包括整合区域气候信息和物种功能特征,例如木材比重、耐旱性和耐荫性。摘要在本综述中,我们描述了 SDI 的属性,这些属性使其在近 90 年来一直被用作 SD 的主要衡量标准。最近,分层贝叶斯方法和线性量子混合建模等稳健统计技术的应用已成为建立最大尺度-密度边界的最佳方法,特别是那些包含气候等辅助变量的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Forestry Reports
Current Forestry Reports Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Current Forestry Reports features in-depth review articles written by global experts on significant advancements in forestry. Its goal is to provide clear, insightful, and balanced contributions that highlight and summarize important topics for forestry researchers and managers. To achieve this, the journal appoints international authorities as Section Editors in various key subject areas like physiological processes, tree genetics, forest management, remote sensing, and wood structure and function. These Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that focus on new developments and recently published papers of great importance. Moreover, an international Editorial Board evaluates the yearly table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their specific country or region, and ensures that the topics are up-to-date and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信