Sex difference and outcome trends following surgical aortic valve replacement from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database.

Gabby Elbaz-Greener, Eldad Rahamim, Zahi Abu Ghosh, Naseem Shadafny, Ronny Alcalai, Amit Korach, Shemy Carasso, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Tomas Igor, Offer Amir, Guy Rozen, David Planer
{"title":"Sex difference and outcome trends following surgical aortic valve replacement from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database.","authors":"Gabby Elbaz-Greener, Eldad Rahamim, Zahi Abu Ghosh, Naseem Shadafny, Ronny Alcalai, Amit Korach, Shemy Carasso, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Tomas Igor, Offer Amir, Guy Rozen, David Planer","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12729-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on worldwide registries, approximately 50% of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) via surgical aortic valve replacement are females. Although AVR procedures have improved greatly in recent years, differences in outcome including mortality between sexes remain. We aimed to investigate the trends in SAVR outcomes in females versus males.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified hospitalizations for patients with diagnosis of aortic stenosis during which SAVR was performed. Patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, procedure complications, and mortality were analyzed. Piecewise regression analyses were performed to assess temporal trends in SAVR utilization in females versus males. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 392,087 hospitalizations for SAVR across the USA were analyzed. Utilization of SAVR in both sex patients decreased significantly during the years 2011-2017. Males compared to females had significantly higher rates of hyperlipidemia, chronic renal disease, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease and tended to be smokers. Differences in mortality rates among sexes were observed for SAVR procedures. Women had higher in-hospital mortality with 3.7% compared to men with 2.5% (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43, P<0.001]). In a multivariable regression model analysis adjusted for potential confounders, women had higher mortality risk with odd ratio (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43], P<0.001). Women had significantly higher rates of vascular complications (5.1% compared to men with 4.6%, P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilization of SAVR showed a downward trend during the study period. Higher in-hospital mortality was recorded in females compared to males.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12729-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Based on worldwide registries, approximately 50% of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) via surgical aortic valve replacement are females. Although AVR procedures have improved greatly in recent years, differences in outcome including mortality between sexes remain. We aimed to investigate the trends in SAVR outcomes in females versus males.

Methods: Using the 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified hospitalizations for patients with diagnosis of aortic stenosis during which SAVR was performed. Patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, procedure complications, and mortality were analyzed. Piecewise regression analyses were performed to assess temporal trends in SAVR utilization in females versus males. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Results: A total of 392,087 hospitalizations for SAVR across the USA were analyzed. Utilization of SAVR in both sex patients decreased significantly during the years 2011-2017. Males compared to females had significantly higher rates of hyperlipidemia, chronic renal disease, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease and tended to be smokers. Differences in mortality rates among sexes were observed for SAVR procedures. Women had higher in-hospital mortality with 3.7% compared to men with 2.5% (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43, P<0.001]). In a multivariable regression model analysis adjusted for potential confounders, women had higher mortality risk with odd ratio (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43], P<0.001). Women had significantly higher rates of vascular complications (5.1% compared to men with 4.6%, P=0.002).

Conclusions: Utilization of SAVR showed a downward trend during the study period. Higher in-hospital mortality was recorded in females compared to males.

全国住院病人抽样(NIS)数据库中主动脉瓣置换手术后的性别差异和结果趋势。
背景:根据全球登记资料,通过外科主动脉瓣置换术接受主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的患者中约有 50%是女性。尽管近年来主动脉瓣置换术有了很大改进,但男女之间在手术效果(包括死亡率)方面仍存在差异。我们旨在调查女性与男性的 SAVR 结果趋势:我们利用 2011-2017 年全国住院病人抽样(NIS)数据库,确定了诊断为主动脉瓣狭窄并在此期间进行了 SAVR 的住院病人。我们分析了患者的社会人口学和临床特征、手术并发症和死亡率。进行了分段回归分析,以评估女性与男性使用 SAVR 的时间趋势。此外,还进行了多变量分析,以确定院内死亡率的预测因素:结果:共分析了全美 392,087 例因 SAVR 而住院的患者。2011-2017年间,男女患者的SAVR使用率均显著下降。与女性相比,男性患高脂血症、慢性肾病、外周动脉疾病和冠状动脉疾病的比例明显更高,而且往往是吸烟者。SAVR手术的男女死亡率存在差异。女性的院内死亡率为3.7%,高于男性的2.5%(OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43, PConclusions:在研究期间,SAVR的使用率呈下降趋势。女性的院内死亡率高于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信