What makes a good general practice consultation? An exploratory pilot study with people from a low socioeconomic background.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0160
Naomi MacPherson, Binh Ta, Lauren Ball, Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss
{"title":"What makes a good general practice consultation? An exploratory pilot study with people from a low socioeconomic background.","authors":"Naomi MacPherson, Binh Ta, Lauren Ball, Nilakshi Gunatillaka, Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While patients from low socioeconomic (SES) backgrounds are at increased risk of developing chronic health conditions, typically managed within general practice, they report fewer positive consultation experiences with GPs than patients from higher SES groups. To our knowledge, existing research does not provide an in-depth understanding of the GP conducts that contribute to positive consultations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the factors that patients from low SES backgrounds perceive as essential for creating good consultation experiences.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>This exploratory pilot study was performed in GP clinics in Melbourne, Australia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used an appreciative inquiry approach, focused on positive consultation experiences, previously shown to be helpful for researching sensitive topics. Nine patients from low SES backgrounds, who reported positive consultation experiences, undertook a semi-structured qualitative interview while watching the video recording of their GP consultation. Four different GPs were captured in the recordings. Inductive thematic coding was performed by two researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following four categories were developed: 1) the doctor's demeanour and how the patient was made to feel during the consultation drove their engagement; 2) an established and collaborative therapeutic relationship was of high importance to patients; 3) a doctor's therapeutic skillset was integral to patient confidence and comfort; and 4) patients appreciated verbal and non-verbal communication techniques. In each interview, the discussion about the video-recorded consultation often triggered reflections about previous consultations with the respective GP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients from low SES groups, positive consultation experiences were underpinned by perceived continuity of care with a specific GP who consistently showed good communication skills and key interpersonal characteristics. This research is a small step towards increasing our understanding of the experience of individuals from low SES backgrounds in primary care and the existing health inequities within this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While patients from low socioeconomic (SES) backgrounds are at increased risk of developing chronic health conditions, typically managed within general practice, they report fewer positive consultation experiences with GPs than patients from higher SES groups. To our knowledge, existing research does not provide an in-depth understanding of the GP conducts that contribute to positive consultations.

Aim: To identify the factors that patients from low SES backgrounds perceive as essential for creating good consultation experiences.

Design & setting: This exploratory pilot study was performed in GP clinics in Melbourne, Australia.

Method: We used an appreciative inquiry approach, focused on positive consultation experiences, previously shown to be helpful for researching sensitive topics. Nine patients from low SES backgrounds, who reported positive consultation experiences, undertook a semi-structured qualitative interview while watching the video recording of their GP consultation. Four different GPs were captured in the recordings. Inductive thematic coding was performed by two researchers.

Results: The following four categories were developed: 1) the doctor's demeanour and how the patient was made to feel during the consultation drove their engagement; 2) an established and collaborative therapeutic relationship was of high importance to patients; 3) a doctor's therapeutic skillset was integral to patient confidence and comfort; and 4) patients appreciated verbal and non-verbal communication techniques. In each interview, the discussion about the video-recorded consultation often triggered reflections about previous consultations with the respective GP.

Conclusion: For patients from low SES groups, positive consultation experiences were underpinned by perceived continuity of care with a specific GP who consistently showed good communication skills and key interpersonal characteristics. This research is a small step towards increasing our understanding of the experience of individuals from low SES backgrounds in primary care and the existing health inequities within this area.

什么是好的全科咨询:一项针对社会经济背景较低人群的探索性试点研究。
背景:虽然来自低社会经济(SES)背景的患者罹患慢性疾病的风险较高,通常由全科医生进行管理,但他们与全科医生(GP)的积极咨询经历却较少。据我们所知,现有的研究并没有深入了解全科医生的行为会对积极的咨询起到什么作用。目的:确定来自低社会经济地位背景的患者认为对创造良好咨询体验至关重要的因素:这项定性研究在墨尔本全科医生诊所进行:我们采用了赞赏式探究方法,重点关注积极的就诊体验,该方法曾被证明有助于敏感话题的研究。九名具有低社会经济地位背景的患者报告了积极的就诊经历,他们在观看全科医生就诊录像的同时接受了半结构化定性访谈。录像中记录了四位不同的全科医生。两名研究人员进行了归纳式主题编码:结果:研究人员对以下四个方面进行了分类(1) 医生的举止和病人的感受,(2) 治疗关系,(3) 医生的治疗技能和 (4) 沟通技巧。在每次访谈中,关于视频录像问诊的讨论往往会引发对以往与相关全科医生问诊的反思:对于来自社会经济地位较低群体的患者来说,积极的就诊体验是由与特定全科医生的连续性护理所支撑的,该全科医生始终表现出良好的沟通技巧和关键的人际关系特征。这项研究为我们进一步了解具有较低社会经济地位背景的个人在初级保健中的经历以及其中存在的健康不平等现象迈出了一小步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信