Effects of gait adaptation training on augmented reality treadmill for patients with stroke in community ambulation.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hang Yang, Zhenzhen Gao, Ye Zhou, Zhenyi Liao, Caiping Song, Yajun Mao
{"title":"Effects of gait adaptation training on augmented reality treadmill for patients with stroke in community ambulation.","authors":"Hang Yang, Zhenzhen Gao, Ye Zhou, Zhenyi Liao, Caiping Song, Yajun Mao","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gait adaptability is essential for stroke survivors to achieve efficient and safe community ambulation. However, conventional treadmill rehabilitation is only a repetitive practice of leg movement. This study compared the effects of augmented reality treadmill-based gait adaptation training with regular treadmill programs for patients with stroke. Forty patients with stroke (n = 40) were randomly assigned to the gait adaptation training {n = 20, age: 49.85 [standard deviation (SD) 8.44] years; onset of stroke: 107.80 (SD 48.31) days} and regular training [n = 20, age: 50.75 (SD 8.05) years, onset of stroke: 111.60 (SD 49.62) days] groups. Both groups completed three sessions of training per week for 5 weeks (15 sessions). The primary outcomes were the 10-m walk test and success rate of obstacle avoidance, while secondary outcomes included the Berg balance scale, component timed-up-and-go, and fall rate in a 6-month follow-up period. Assessments were performed before and after the intervention. The paired t-test was applied to compare the differences within groups and independent sample t-test was performed to compare the differences between groups. The 10-m walk test, success rate of obstacle avoidance, Berg balance scale, and component timed-up-and-go all significantly improved in the both groups (P < .001). The success rate of obstacle avoidance [P = .02, 95% confidence interval (CI): -21.07, -1.64], Berg Balance Scale (P = .02, 95% CI: -8.03, -0.67), 'turning around time' (P = .04, 95% CI: 0.08, 2.81), 'stand-to-sit' (P = .03, 95% CI: 0.16, 2.41) and 'total time' (P = .048, 95% CI: 0.04, 10.32) improved significantly in gait adaptation training group after intervention, while the 10-m walk test (P = .09, 95% CI: -0.17, 0.01), timed 'sit-to-stand' (P = .09, 95% CI: -0.14, 2.04), and 'linear walking' (P = .09, 95% CI: -0.27, 3.25) in gait adaptation training group did not show statistical difference compared to the regular training group. Total fall rate during the follow-up period was statistically decreased in the gait adaptation training group (P = .045). Both interventions improved mobility outcomes, with augmented reality treadmill-based gait adaptation indicating greater improvement in obstacle avoidance, balance, turning, and stand-to-sit. Augmented reality treadmill-based gait adaptation training emerges as an effective and promising intervention for patients with stroke in early rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gait adaptability is essential for stroke survivors to achieve efficient and safe community ambulation. However, conventional treadmill rehabilitation is only a repetitive practice of leg movement. This study compared the effects of augmented reality treadmill-based gait adaptation training with regular treadmill programs for patients with stroke. Forty patients with stroke (n = 40) were randomly assigned to the gait adaptation training {n = 20, age: 49.85 [standard deviation (SD) 8.44] years; onset of stroke: 107.80 (SD 48.31) days} and regular training [n = 20, age: 50.75 (SD 8.05) years, onset of stroke: 111.60 (SD 49.62) days] groups. Both groups completed three sessions of training per week for 5 weeks (15 sessions). The primary outcomes were the 10-m walk test and success rate of obstacle avoidance, while secondary outcomes included the Berg balance scale, component timed-up-and-go, and fall rate in a 6-month follow-up period. Assessments were performed before and after the intervention. The paired t-test was applied to compare the differences within groups and independent sample t-test was performed to compare the differences between groups. The 10-m walk test, success rate of obstacle avoidance, Berg balance scale, and component timed-up-and-go all significantly improved in the both groups (P < .001). The success rate of obstacle avoidance [P = .02, 95% confidence interval (CI): -21.07, -1.64], Berg Balance Scale (P = .02, 95% CI: -8.03, -0.67), 'turning around time' (P = .04, 95% CI: 0.08, 2.81), 'stand-to-sit' (P = .03, 95% CI: 0.16, 2.41) and 'total time' (P = .048, 95% CI: 0.04, 10.32) improved significantly in gait adaptation training group after intervention, while the 10-m walk test (P = .09, 95% CI: -0.17, 0.01), timed 'sit-to-stand' (P = .09, 95% CI: -0.14, 2.04), and 'linear walking' (P = .09, 95% CI: -0.27, 3.25) in gait adaptation training group did not show statistical difference compared to the regular training group. Total fall rate during the follow-up period was statistically decreased in the gait adaptation training group (P = .045). Both interventions improved mobility outcomes, with augmented reality treadmill-based gait adaptation indicating greater improvement in obstacle avoidance, balance, turning, and stand-to-sit. Augmented reality treadmill-based gait adaptation training emerges as an effective and promising intervention for patients with stroke in early rehabilitation.

在增强现实跑步机上进行步态适应训练对脑卒中患者在社区行走的影响
背景:步态适应能力对中风幸存者实现高效、安全的社区行走至关重要。然而,传统的跑步机康复训练只是腿部运动的重复练习。本研究比较了基于增强现实(AR)的跑步机步态适应训练与常规跑步机项目对中风患者的影响:40 名中风患者(N = 40)被随机分配到步态适应训练中(N = 20,年龄:49.85(SD 8.44)岁;中风发病时间:107.80(SD 48.31)年):107.80(SD 48.31)天)和常规训练(n = 20,年龄:50.75(SD 8.05)岁,卒中发病时间:111.60(SD 49.62)天):111.60 (SD 49.62) 天)组。两组均每周进行三次训练,为期五周(15 次)。主要结果包括 10 米步行测试和避障成功率,次要结果包括伯格平衡量表、定时起立行走部分和六个月随访期间的跌倒率。评估在干预前后进行。采用配对t检验比较组内差异,采用独立样本t检验比较组间差异:结果:两组的 10 米步行测试、避障成功率、Berg 平衡量表、定时起立-走的分量均有明显改善(P < 0.001)。避障成功率(P = 0.02,95% CI:-21.07,-1.64)、Berg 平衡量表(P = 0.02,95% CI:-8.03,-0.67)、"转身时间"(P = 0.04,95% CI:0.08,2.81)、"站立到坐下"(P = 0.03,95% CI:0.16,2.41)和 "总时间"(P = 0.048,95% CI:0.04,10.32)在步态适应中均有明显改善(P < 0.001)。而步态适应训练组的10米步行测试(P = 0.09,95% CI:-0.17,0.01)、定时 "坐立"(P = 0.09,95% CI:-0.14,2.04)和 "直线行走"(P = 0.09,95% CI:-0.27,3.25)与常规训练组相比无统计学差异。步态适应训练组在随访期间的总跌倒率在统计学上有所下降(P = 0.045):结论:两种干预措施都能改善行动能力,其中基于AR跑步机的步态适应训练在避障、平衡、转身和站立到坐下方面的改善更大。基于AR跑步机的步态适应训练对处于早期康复阶段的脑卒中患者来说是一种有效且有前景的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信