Effects of Rock Covering on Underlying Engineered Media in Bioretention Practices in Middle Tennessee, USA

IF 0.9 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Blue Curry, Andrea Ludwig, Michael Essington
{"title":"Effects of Rock Covering on Underlying Engineered Media in Bioretention Practices in Middle Tennessee, USA","authors":"Blue Curry,&nbsp;Andrea Ludwig,&nbsp;Michael Essington","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-704X.2024.3398.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Bioretention practices have become a common way to protect natural waterways in urban and suburban landscapes across the United States. However, optimal design, implementation, operation, and maintenance are still in need of study. A field survey of 52 bioretention practices was conducted in Davidson County, Tennessee, to address research questions related to operation and maintenance. A suite of site conditions were documented, such as size, signs of erosion, and dominant surface cover. Samples were collected from the surface of the engineered media layer and analyzed for organic matter content and bulk density. Vegetation was described in terms of dominant species and canopy cover. On average, the organic matter content of media under plant-based mulch cover was significantly greater than that under rock cover (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Bulk density of the surface media is strongly and inversely correlated to organic matter content; bulk density did not generally vary with bioretention area age and was highly variable within treatments. On average, the bulk density of the media under the plant-based mulch cover was significantly less than that under the rock cover. Media under the composite treatments had similar bulk density to both the plant-based mulch (<i>p</i> = 0.233) and the rock covers (<i>p</i> = 0.132). Plant canopy did not surpass 70% in practices with bulk density values above 1.55 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. These results suggest that consideration should be made regarding the tradeoffs between utilizing rock coverings and potential for plant establishment impacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2024.3398.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2024.3398.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioretention practices have become a common way to protect natural waterways in urban and suburban landscapes across the United States. However, optimal design, implementation, operation, and maintenance are still in need of study. A field survey of 52 bioretention practices was conducted in Davidson County, Tennessee, to address research questions related to operation and maintenance. A suite of site conditions were documented, such as size, signs of erosion, and dominant surface cover. Samples were collected from the surface of the engineered media layer and analyzed for organic matter content and bulk density. Vegetation was described in terms of dominant species and canopy cover. On average, the organic matter content of media under plant-based mulch cover was significantly greater than that under rock cover (p = 0.002). Bulk density of the surface media is strongly and inversely correlated to organic matter content; bulk density did not generally vary with bioretention area age and was highly variable within treatments. On average, the bulk density of the media under the plant-based mulch cover was significantly less than that under the rock cover. Media under the composite treatments had similar bulk density to both the plant-based mulch (p = 0.233) and the rock covers (p = 0.132). Plant canopy did not surpass 70% in practices with bulk density values above 1.55 g/cm3. These results suggest that consideration should be made regarding the tradeoffs between utilizing rock coverings and potential for plant establishment impacts.

Abstract Image

美国田纳西州中部生物滞留法中岩石覆盖对底层工程介质的影响
在美国各地的城市和郊区景观中,生物滞留法已成为保护自然水道的常用方法。然而,最佳设计、实施、运行和维护仍有待研究。田纳西州戴维森县对 52 个生物滞留措施进行了实地调查,以解决与运行和维护相关的研究问题。调查记录了一系列场地条件,如面积、侵蚀迹象和主要表面覆盖物。从工程介质层表面采集样本,分析有机物含量和体积密度。植被根据主要物种和树冠覆盖率进行描述。平均而言,植物覆盖层下介质的有机质含量明显高于岩石覆盖层下的有机质含量(p = 0.002)。表层介质的容积密度与有机物含量密切相关,且呈反比;容积密度一般不随生物滞留区的年龄而变化,而且在不同处理中变化很大。平均而言,植物地膜覆盖下的介质容积密度明显低于岩石覆盖下的介质容积密度。复合处理下的介质容重与植物覆盖物(p = 0.233)和岩石覆盖物(p = 0.132)相似。在容重值高于 1.55 克/立方厘米的实践中,植物冠层不超过 70%。这些结果表明,应考虑在利用岩石覆盖层和潜在的植物生长影响之间进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信