Reconsidering "Critical" Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: 17-Year Follow-Up Study following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5598107
Lawrence Chun-Man Lau, Wai-Wang Chau, Randy Ng, Jonathan Patrick Ng, Elvis Chun-Sing Chui, Michael Tim-Yun Ong, James Francis Griffith, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
{"title":"Reconsidering \"Critical\" Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: 17-Year Follow-Up Study following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.","authors":"Lawrence Chun-Man Lau, Wai-Wang Chau, Randy Ng, Jonathan Patrick Ng, Elvis Chun-Sing Chui, Michael Tim-Yun Ong, James Francis Griffith, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung","doi":"10.1155/2024/5598107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glenoid bone loss is a risk factor leading to the failure of arthroscopic Bankart repair. While 20-25% glenoid bone loss has long been considered the level to necessitate bony augmentation, recent studies indicate that 13.5% has a \"subcritical\" glenoid bone loss level, which is associated with decreased short- and medium-term functional scores. Few researchers worked on the long-term effect of \"subcritical\" or even less severe degrees of glenoid bone loss on redislocation rates and functional outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of subcritical or less severe glenoid bone loss on redislocation rates and function after arthroscopic Bankart repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A patient cohort who had undergone computed tomography (CT) of glenoid bone loss and arthroscopic Bankart repair over 15 years ago was reviewed. Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, redislocation after operation, mechanism of recurrence, and revision details were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were reassessed 17.6 ± 1.9 years following initial surgery. The age at enrolment was 26.8 ± 8.3 years. Twenty-two (29%) patients of the 75 patients had a redislocation on long-term follow-up, though this was not related to glenoid bone loss severity. The impaired functional score was found in patients with initial glenoid bone loss of 7% or more on long-term follow-up: WOSI (physical symptoms): 0.98 ± 2.00 vs 2.25 ± 4.01, <i>p</i>=0.04 and WOSI (total): 0.79 ± 1.43 vs 1.88 ± 3.56, <i>p</i>=0.04.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At a mean of 17.5 years following arthroscopic Bankart repair, redislocation occurs in over a quarter of 75 patients, and they are not related to initial glenoid bone loss severity. Impaired functional outcome is apparent in patients with initial glenoid bone loss of >7%, though this impairment does not seem sufficiently severe to warrant an alternative treatment approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5598107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10849799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5598107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glenoid bone loss is a risk factor leading to the failure of arthroscopic Bankart repair. While 20-25% glenoid bone loss has long been considered the level to necessitate bony augmentation, recent studies indicate that 13.5% has a "subcritical" glenoid bone loss level, which is associated with decreased short- and medium-term functional scores. Few researchers worked on the long-term effect of "subcritical" or even less severe degrees of glenoid bone loss on redislocation rates and functional outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of subcritical or less severe glenoid bone loss on redislocation rates and function after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Methods: A patient cohort who had undergone computed tomography (CT) of glenoid bone loss and arthroscopic Bankart repair over 15 years ago was reviewed. Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, redislocation after operation, mechanism of recurrence, and revision details were reviewed.

Results: Seventy-five patients were reassessed 17.6 ± 1.9 years following initial surgery. The age at enrolment was 26.8 ± 8.3 years. Twenty-two (29%) patients of the 75 patients had a redislocation on long-term follow-up, though this was not related to glenoid bone loss severity. The impaired functional score was found in patients with initial glenoid bone loss of 7% or more on long-term follow-up: WOSI (physical symptoms): 0.98 ± 2.00 vs 2.25 ± 4.01, p=0.04 and WOSI (total): 0.79 ± 1.43 vs 1.88 ± 3.56, p=0.04.

Conclusions: At a mean of 17.5 years following arthroscopic Bankart repair, redislocation occurs in over a quarter of 75 patients, and they are not related to initial glenoid bone loss severity. Impaired functional outcome is apparent in patients with initial glenoid bone loss of >7%, though this impairment does not seem sufficiently severe to warrant an alternative treatment approach.

重新考虑肩关节失稳的 "临界 "骨质流失:关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后 17 年随访研究。
背景:盂骨流失是导致关节镜下 Bankart 修复术失败的一个风险因素。长期以来,20%-25%的盂骨缺损被认为是需要进行骨质增强的水平,但最近的研究表明,13.5%的盂骨缺损属于 "亚临界 "水平,与短期和中期功能评分下降有关。很少有研究人员研究 "亚临界 "或更轻程度的盂骨缺损对关节镜下Bankart修复术后再脱位率和功能预后的长期影响。本研究旨在评估亚临界或较轻程度的盂骨缺损对关节镜下Bankart修复术后再脱位率和功能的影响:方法:研究人员回顾了15年前接受计算机断层扫描(CT)检查盂骨缺损和关节镜Bankart修复术的患者队列。回顾了西安大略省肩关节不稳定性(WOSI)评分、单一评估数值评价(SANE)评分、术后再脱位、复发机制和翻修细节:75名患者在初次手术后17.6 ± 1.9年接受了再次评估。入组年龄为(26.8±8.3)岁。75名患者中有22名(29%)在长期随访中发生了重新脱位,但这与盂骨缺损的严重程度无关。在长期随访中发现,初次盂骨缺损达到或超过7%的患者功能评分较低:WOSI(躯体症状):0.98 ± 2.00 vs 0.98 ± 2.000.98 ± 2.00 vs 2.25 ± 4.01,p=0.04;WOSI(总分):0.79 ± 1.43 vs 2.25 ± 4.01,p=0.04:结论:在关节镜下进行Bankart修复术后平均17.5年,75名患者中有四分之一以上会发生再脱位,且与最初的盂骨缺损严重程度无关。最初盂骨损失大于7%的患者的功能结果明显受损,但这种受损程度似乎还没有严重到需要采用其他治疗方法的地步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信