Intubation Time, Lung Mechanics and Outcome in COVID-19 Patients Suffering Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Single-Center Study.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of clinical medicine research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.14740/jocmr4984
Diamanto Aretha, Sotiria Kefala, Alexandra Nikolopoulou, Vasilios Karamouzos, Maria Valta, Virginia Mplani, Alexandra Georgakopoulou, Chrysavgi Papamichail, Christina Sklavou, Fotini Fligou
{"title":"Intubation Time, Lung Mechanics and Outcome in COVID-19 Patients Suffering Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Single-Center Study.","authors":"Diamanto Aretha, Sotiria Kefala, Alexandra Nikolopoulou, Vasilios Karamouzos, Maria Valta, Virginia Mplani, Alexandra Georgakopoulou, Chrysavgi Papamichail, Christina Sklavou, Fotini Fligou","doi":"10.14740/jocmr4984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We examined the effect of intubation time and the lung mechanics on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the patient's hospital admission, intubation time was defined as early (≤ 2 days) or late (> 2 days). Patients were further divided into three groups; early (≤ 3 days), late (4 - 6 days), and very late (> 6 days) intubated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 194 patients were included; 66.5% male, median age 65 years. Fifty-eight patients (29.9%) were intubated early and 136 (70.1%) late. Early intubated patients revealed lower mortality (44.8% vs. 72%, P < 0.001), were younger (60 vs. 67, P = 0.002), had lower sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (6 vs. 8, P = 0.002) and higher lung compliance on admission days 1, 6 and 12 (42 vs. 36, P = 0.006; 40 vs. 33, P < 0.001; and 37.5 vs. 32, P < 0.001, respectively). Older age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.15, P < 0.001), intubation time (aOR = 1.15, P = 0.004), high SOFA scores (aOR = 1.81, P < 0.001), low partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>)/fractional inspired oxygen tension (FiO<sub>2</sub>) ratio (aOR = 0.96, P = 0.001), and low lung compliance on admission days 1 and 12 (aOR = 1.12, P = 0.012 and aOR = 1.14, P < 0.001, respectively) were associated with higher mortality. Very late and late intubated patients had higher mortality rates than patients intubated early (78.4% vs. 63.4% vs. 44.6%, respectively, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among COVID-19 intubated patients, age, late intubation, high SOFA scores, low PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio, and low lung compliance are associated with higher intensive care unit (ICU) mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"16 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10846488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We examined the effect of intubation time and the lung mechanics on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Methods: Based on the patient's hospital admission, intubation time was defined as early (≤ 2 days) or late (> 2 days). Patients were further divided into three groups; early (≤ 3 days), late (4 - 6 days), and very late (> 6 days) intubated.

Results: A total of 194 patients were included; 66.5% male, median age 65 years. Fifty-eight patients (29.9%) were intubated early and 136 (70.1%) late. Early intubated patients revealed lower mortality (44.8% vs. 72%, P < 0.001), were younger (60 vs. 67, P = 0.002), had lower sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (6 vs. 8, P = 0.002) and higher lung compliance on admission days 1, 6 and 12 (42 vs. 36, P = 0.006; 40 vs. 33, P < 0.001; and 37.5 vs. 32, P < 0.001, respectively). Older age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.15, P < 0.001), intubation time (aOR = 1.15, P = 0.004), high SOFA scores (aOR = 1.81, P < 0.001), low partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fractional inspired oxygen tension (FiO2) ratio (aOR = 0.96, P = 0.001), and low lung compliance on admission days 1 and 12 (aOR = 1.12, P = 0.012 and aOR = 1.14, P < 0.001, respectively) were associated with higher mortality. Very late and late intubated patients had higher mortality rates than patients intubated early (78.4% vs. 63.4% vs. 44.6%, respectively, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Among COVID-19 intubated patients, age, late intubation, high SOFA scores, low PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and low lung compliance are associated with higher intensive care unit (ICU) mortality.

COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的插管时间、肺力学和预后:单中心研究
背景:我们研究了插管时间和肺力学对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者临床预后的影响:根据患者的入院时间,将插管时间定义为早期(≤ 2 天)或晚期(> 2 天)。将患者进一步分为三组:早期插管(≤ 3 天)、晚期插管(4 - 6 天)和极晚期插管(> 6 天):共纳入 194 名患者;66.5% 为男性,中位年龄为 65 岁。58名患者(29.9%)早期插管,136名患者(70.1%)晚期插管。早期插管的患者死亡率较低(44.8% 对 72%,P < 0.001),年龄较小(60 岁对 67 岁,P = 0.002),序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分较低(6 分对 8 分,P = 0.002),入院第 1、6 和 12 天的肺顺应性较高(分别为 42 分对 36 分,P = 0.006;40 分对 33 分,P < 0.001;37.5 分对 32 分,P < 0.001)。年龄大(调整后的几率比(aOR)= 1.15,P < 0.001)、插管时间长(aOR = 1.15,P = 0.004)、SOFA评分高(aOR = 1.81,P < 0.001)、氧分压(PaO2)/吸入氧张力(FiO2)比值低(aOR = 0.96,P = 0.001)、入院第 1 天和第 12 天肺顺应性低(aOR = 1.12,P = 0.012 和 aOR = 1.14,P < 0.001)与死亡率升高有关。极晚和晚插管患者的死亡率高于早期插管患者(分别为78.4% vs. 63.4% vs. 44.6%,P < 0.001):结论:在COVID-19插管患者中,年龄大、插管晚、SOFA评分高、PaO2/FiO2比值低和肺顺应性低与重症监护室(ICU)死亡率较高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信