Effectiveness of telerehabilitation-based structured exercise program in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation: a randomized controlled study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2310767
Mehmet Kurtaran, Derya Çelik
{"title":"Effectiveness of telerehabilitation-based structured exercise program in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Mehmet Kurtaran, Derya Çelik","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2310767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to compare the effects of home exercise alone and telerehabilitation combined with home exercise in individuals with transtibial amputation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The telerehabilitation group (<i>n</i> = 24) received telerehabilitation combined with home exercise, while the control group (<i>n</i> = 24) received home exercise alone. Outcomes included the timed up-and-go (TUG) test and the 30-second chair-stand test (30CST), the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES), the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The analysis used a 2 × 2 mixed repeated measures ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group-by-time interactions were significant for TUG (<i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>F</i>[1;41] = 10.74) and 30CST (<i>p</i> = 0.001, <i>F</i>[1;41] = 11.48). The mean difference (6th week-baseline) was -0.49 for TUG and 0.95 for 30CST in the telerehabilitation group and -0.14 for TUG and 0.13 for 30CST in the control group. There were statistically meaningful group-by-time interactions on the ABC (<i>p</i> = 0.0004, <i>F</i>[1;41] = 14.47), the TAPES-activity restriction (<i>p</i> = 0.0001, <i>F</i>[1;41] = 28.96), TAPES-prosthesis satisfaction (<i>p</i> = 0.004, <i>F</i>[1;41] = 9.19), and the NHP (<i>p</i> = 0.0002, <i>F</i>[1;41] = 16.07) favoring the telerehabilitation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telerehabilitation combined with home exercise can offer greater benefits in improving gait, muscle strength, balance confidence, activity restriction, prosthesis satisfaction, and quality of life compared to home exercise alone for individuals with transtibial amputation.Implications for rehabilitationExercise helps individuals with lower limb amputation overcome their physical limitations and enables them to use their prostheses effectively.Physiotherapy and rehabilitation after amputation are not at the desired level, and individuals with lower limb amputation encounter various difficulties in accessing physiotherapy.Telerehabilitation has great potential to facilitate access to physiotherapy for individuals with amputation and reduce resource utilization.In a relatively small sample of amputees, this study shows that telerehabilitation-based exercise improves physical health and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5651-5659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2310767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the effects of home exercise alone and telerehabilitation combined with home exercise in individuals with transtibial amputation.

Materials and methods: The telerehabilitation group (n = 24) received telerehabilitation combined with home exercise, while the control group (n = 24) received home exercise alone. Outcomes included the timed up-and-go (TUG) test and the 30-second chair-stand test (30CST), the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES), the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The analysis used a 2 × 2 mixed repeated measures ANOVA.

Results: The group-by-time interactions were significant for TUG (p = 0.002, F[1;41] = 10.74) and 30CST (p = 0.001, F[1;41] = 11.48). The mean difference (6th week-baseline) was -0.49 for TUG and 0.95 for 30CST in the telerehabilitation group and -0.14 for TUG and 0.13 for 30CST in the control group. There were statistically meaningful group-by-time interactions on the ABC (p = 0.0004, F[1;41] = 14.47), the TAPES-activity restriction (p = 0.0001, F[1;41] = 28.96), TAPES-prosthesis satisfaction (p = 0.004, F[1;41] = 9.19), and the NHP (p = 0.0002, F[1;41] = 16.07) favoring the telerehabilitation group.

Conclusions: Telerehabilitation combined with home exercise can offer greater benefits in improving gait, muscle strength, balance confidence, activity restriction, prosthesis satisfaction, and quality of life compared to home exercise alone for individuals with transtibial amputation.Implications for rehabilitationExercise helps individuals with lower limb amputation overcome their physical limitations and enables them to use their prostheses effectively.Physiotherapy and rehabilitation after amputation are not at the desired level, and individuals with lower limb amputation encounter various difficulties in accessing physiotherapy.Telerehabilitation has great potential to facilitate access to physiotherapy for individuals with amputation and reduce resource utilization.In a relatively small sample of amputees, this study shows that telerehabilitation-based exercise improves physical health and quality of life.

以远程康复为基础的结构化锻炼计划对单侧经胫截肢患者的疗效:随机对照研究。
目的:该研究旨在比较单独进行家庭锻炼和远程康复与家庭锻炼相结合对截肢者的影响:远程康复组(24 人)接受远程康复与家庭锻炼相结合的治疗,对照组(24 人)仅接受家庭锻炼。研究结果包括定时起立行走(TUG)测试和30秒椅子站立测试(30CST)、特定活动平衡信心(ABC)量表、三位一体截肢和假肢体验量表(TAPES)、截肢者身体形象量表(ABIS)和诺丁汉健康档案(NHP)。分析采用 2 × 2 混合重复测量方差分析:在 TUG(p = 0.002,F[1;41] = 10.74)和 30CST (p = 0.001,F[1;41] = 11.48)方面,组间时间交互作用显著。在远程康复组,TUG 和 30CST 的平均差异(第 6 周-基线)分别为-0.49 和 0.95;在对照组,TUG 和 30CST 的平均差异分别为-0.14 和 0.13。在ABC(p = 0.0004,F[1;41] = 14.47)、TAPES-活动限制(p = 0.0001,F[1;41] = 28.96)、TAPES-假肢满意度(p = 0.004,F[1;41] = 9.19)和NHP(p = 0.0002,F[1;41] = 16.07)方面,有统计学意义的组间时间交互作用有利于远程康复组:结论:远程康复与家庭锻炼相结合,在改善步态、肌肉力量、平衡自信心、活动受限、假肢满意度和生活质量方面,对经胫截肢患者的益处大于单独的家庭锻炼。截肢后的物理治疗和康复并没有达到理想的水平,下肢截肢者在接受物理治疗时会遇到各种困难。远程康复在方便截肢者接受物理治疗和减少资源利用方面具有很大的潜力。在一个相对较小的截肢者样本中,这项研究表明,基于远程康复的锻炼可以改善身体健康和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信