Certain fracture patterns in children/adolescents would be better called 'Barton equivalent' fractures.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Soo Min Cha, Hyun Dae Shin, In Ho Ga, Yong Hwan Kim
{"title":"Certain fracture patterns in children/adolescents would be better called 'Barton equivalent' fractures.","authors":"Soo Min Cha, Hyun Dae Shin, In Ho Ga, Yong Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have encountered consecutive children/adolescents with a volar Barton fracture (VBF) pattern without involving the physis. These were managed by buttress plating; thus, we would like to report the radiological and clinical outcomes through retrospective case series and suggest the revisiting of the 'VBF category' in this population. We screened children/adolescents with a diagnosis of trauma to the bony structures in the wrist from 2008 to 2019. Of these patients, 16 who met our inclusion/exclusion criteria were investigated. At the final follow-up performed at least 2 years postoperatively, radiologic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. The mean age at the time of injury was 12.88 years old. At the final follow-up, the volar tiltings, radial inclinations and ulnar variances were 10.13°, 20.88° and -0.50 mm, respectively. None of these radiologic parameters were significantly different from the contralateral values, except the radial inclination. The mean visual analog scale score was 0.38. The mean range of motion arcs were 136.56° and 157.81° in the flexion-extension and pronation-supination arcs, respectively, and the grip strength was 22.00 kg. The mean modified Mayo Wrist Score was 92.8. The radiologic and clinical outcomes compared with the contralateral side were not significantly different from those in a previous report. A VBF pattern without involving the physis in the child/adolescent population was treated satisfactorily by buttress plating. Thus, including the previously reported 'SH-II in sagittal plane' injuries, the current injury pattern would be better called a 'Barton equivalent' fracture. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"134-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have encountered consecutive children/adolescents with a volar Barton fracture (VBF) pattern without involving the physis. These were managed by buttress plating; thus, we would like to report the radiological and clinical outcomes through retrospective case series and suggest the revisiting of the 'VBF category' in this population. We screened children/adolescents with a diagnosis of trauma to the bony structures in the wrist from 2008 to 2019. Of these patients, 16 who met our inclusion/exclusion criteria were investigated. At the final follow-up performed at least 2 years postoperatively, radiologic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. The mean age at the time of injury was 12.88 years old. At the final follow-up, the volar tiltings, radial inclinations and ulnar variances were 10.13°, 20.88° and -0.50 mm, respectively. None of these radiologic parameters were significantly different from the contralateral values, except the radial inclination. The mean visual analog scale score was 0.38. The mean range of motion arcs were 136.56° and 157.81° in the flexion-extension and pronation-supination arcs, respectively, and the grip strength was 22.00 kg. The mean modified Mayo Wrist Score was 92.8. The radiologic and clinical outcomes compared with the contralateral side were not significantly different from those in a previous report. A VBF pattern without involving the physis in the child/adolescent population was treated satisfactorily by buttress plating. Thus, including the previously reported 'SH-II in sagittal plane' injuries, the current injury pattern would be better called a 'Barton equivalent' fracture. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

儿童/青少年的某些骨折模式最好称为 "巴顿等效 "骨折。
我们曾连续遇到过一些儿童/青少年,他们的外侧巴顿骨折(VBF)形态没有累及骺板。因此,我们希望通过回顾性病例系列报告其放射学和临床结果,并建议在这一人群中重新审视 "VBF类别"。我们对 2008 年至 2019 年期间确诊为腕部骨骼结构创伤的儿童/青少年进行了筛查。在这些患者中,我们对符合纳入/排除标准的 16 名患者进行了调查。在术后至少两年的最终随访中,我们对放射学和临床结果进行了评估。受伤时的平均年龄为 12.88 岁。在最后的随访中,患者的体侧倾斜度、桡侧倾斜度和尺侧偏差分别为10.13°、20.88°和-0.50毫米。除桡侧倾角外,这些放射学参数均与对侧值无明显差异。平均视觉模拟量表评分为 0.38。屈伸运动弧度和前屈-上举运动弧度的平均范围分别为136.56°和157.81°,握力为22.00公斤。改良梅奥腕评分的平均值为 92.8。与对侧相比,该患者的放射学和临床结果与之前的报告无明显差异。在儿童/青少年人群中,不累及肱骨骺端的VBF模式可通过支撑钢板得到满意的治疗。因此,包括之前报道的 "矢状面SH-II "损伤在内,目前的损伤模式更适合称为 "巴顿等效 "骨折。证据等级:IV级,回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信