Exploring Parent Experiences With Early Palliative Care Practices in the NICU.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001137
Megan Quinn, Sheila Gephart, Janice Crist
{"title":"Exploring Parent Experiences With Early Palliative Care Practices in the NICU.","authors":"Megan Quinn, Sheila Gephart, Janice Crist","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anxiety and uncertain outcome of an admission of a seriously ill infant to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can cause great stress for parents and contribute to poor mental health outcomes. Early implementation of family-centered palliative care (PC) may provide support for NICU parents. Key concepts of early PC in the NICU include shared decision-making, care planning, and support for coping with distress.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore parent experiences during their child's NICU admission with the early PC practices of shared decision-making, care planning, and coping with distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative descriptive methodology was used. Strategies of reflexive journaling, peer debriefing, and data audits were used to enhance trustworthiness. Parents (N = 16) were interviewed, and data were analyzed by conventional content analysis. Targeted recruitment of fathers occurred to ensure they comprised 25% of sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents' descriptions of decision-making were contextualized in gathering information to make a decision, the emotional impact of the decision, and influences on their decision-making. In experiences with care planning, parents described learning to advocate, having a spectator versus participant role, and experiencing care planning as communication. Key themes expressed regarding parental coping were exposure to trauma, survival mode, and a changing support network.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>These findings highlight key areas for practice improvement: providing more support and collaboration in decision-making, true engagement of parents in care planning, and encouraging peer support and interaction in the NICU and in online communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":"98-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The anxiety and uncertain outcome of an admission of a seriously ill infant to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can cause great stress for parents and contribute to poor mental health outcomes. Early implementation of family-centered palliative care (PC) may provide support for NICU parents. Key concepts of early PC in the NICU include shared decision-making, care planning, and support for coping with distress.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore parent experiences during their child's NICU admission with the early PC practices of shared decision-making, care planning, and coping with distress.

Methods: Qualitative descriptive methodology was used. Strategies of reflexive journaling, peer debriefing, and data audits were used to enhance trustworthiness. Parents (N = 16) were interviewed, and data were analyzed by conventional content analysis. Targeted recruitment of fathers occurred to ensure they comprised 25% of sample.

Results: Parents' descriptions of decision-making were contextualized in gathering information to make a decision, the emotional impact of the decision, and influences on their decision-making. In experiences with care planning, parents described learning to advocate, having a spectator versus participant role, and experiencing care planning as communication. Key themes expressed regarding parental coping were exposure to trauma, survival mode, and a changing support network.

Implications for practice and research: These findings highlight key areas for practice improvement: providing more support and collaboration in decision-making, true engagement of parents in care planning, and encouraging peer support and interaction in the NICU and in online communities.

探索新生儿重症监护室早期姑息治疗的家长体验。
背景:新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治重症婴儿时,焦虑和不确定的结果会给父母带来巨大的压力,并导致不良的心理健康后果。早期实施以家庭为中心的姑息治疗(PC)可为新生儿重症监护室的父母提供支持。NICU 早期姑息关怀的关键概念包括共同决策、护理计划和支持应对痛苦。目的:本研究旨在探讨父母在其子女入住 NICU 期间在共同决策、护理计划和应对痛苦等早期姑息关怀实践方面的经验:方法:采用定性描述方法。方法: 采用定性描述法,使用反思性日记、同伴汇报和数据审计等策略来提高可信度。对家长(N = 16)进行了访谈,并通过常规内容分析法对数据进行了分析。对父亲进行了有针对性的招募,以确保他们占样本的 25%:结果:家长对决策过程的描述包括收集信息以做出决策、决策对情绪的影响以及对决策的影响。在护理规划的经历中,家长描述了学习倡导、旁观者与参与者的角色,以及将护理规划视为沟通的经历。关于父母应对问题的关键主题是遭受创伤、生存模式和不断变化的支持网络:这些研究结果强调了改进实践的关键领域:在决策过程中提供更多支持和协作、让家长真正参与护理规划、鼓励新生儿重症监护室和网络社区中的同伴支持和互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信