The #SeePainMoreClearly Phase II Pain in Dementia Social Media Campaign: Implementation and Evaluation Study.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.2196/53025
Louise I R Castillo, Vivian Tran, Mary Brachaniec, Christine T Chambers, Kelly Chessie, Alec Couros, Andre LeRuyet, Charmayne LeRuyet, Lilian Thorpe, Jaime Williams, Sara Wheelwright, Thomas Hadjistavropoulos
{"title":"The #SeePainMoreClearly Phase II Pain in Dementia Social Media Campaign: Implementation and Evaluation Study.","authors":"Louise I R Castillo, Vivian Tran, Mary Brachaniec, Christine T Chambers, Kelly Chessie, Alec Couros, Andre LeRuyet, Charmayne LeRuyet, Lilian Thorpe, Jaime Williams, Sara Wheelwright, Thomas Hadjistavropoulos","doi":"10.2196/53025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media platforms have been effective in raising awareness of the underassessment and undertreatment of pain in dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>After a successful pilot campaign, we aimed to scale our pain-in-dementia knowledge mobilization pilot initiative (ie, #SeePainMoreClearly) to several social media platforms with the aid of a digital media partner. The goal of the initiative was to increase awareness of the challenges in the assessment and management of pain among people with dementia. A variety of metrics were implemented to evaluate the effort. Through this work, we endeavored to highlight key differences between our pilot initiative (which was a grassroots initiative), focusing largely on Twitter and YouTube, and the current science-media partnership. We also aimed to generate recommendations suitable for other social media campaigns related to health or aging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evidence-based information about pain in dementia was summarized into engaging content (eg, videos) tailored to the needs of various knowledge users (eg, health professionals, families, and policy makers). We disseminated information using Facebook (Meta Platforms), Twitter (X Corp), YouTube (Alphabet Inc), Instagram (Meta Platforms), and LinkedIn (LinkedIn Corp) and measured the success of the initiative over a 12-month period (2020 to 2021). The evaluation methods focused on web analytics and questionnaires related to social media content. Knowledge users' web responses about the initiative and semistructured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the course of the campaign, >700 posts were shared across all platforms. Web analytics showed that we drew >60,000 users from 82 countries to our resource website. Of the social media platforms used, Facebook was the most effective in reaching knowledge users (ie, over 1,300,000 users). Questionnaire responses from users were favorable; interview responses indicated that the information shared throughout the initiative increased awareness of the problem of pain in dementia and influenced respondent behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this investigation, we demonstrated success in directing knowledge users to a resource website with practical information that health professionals could use in patient care along with pain assessment and management information for caregivers and people living with dementia. The evaluation metrics suggested no considerable differences between our pilot campaign and broader initiative when accounting for the length of time of each initiative. The limitations of large-scale health campaigns were noted, and recommendations were outlined for other researchers aiming to leverage social media as a knowledge mobilization tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e53025"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10884893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms have been effective in raising awareness of the underassessment and undertreatment of pain in dementia.

Objective: After a successful pilot campaign, we aimed to scale our pain-in-dementia knowledge mobilization pilot initiative (ie, #SeePainMoreClearly) to several social media platforms with the aid of a digital media partner. The goal of the initiative was to increase awareness of the challenges in the assessment and management of pain among people with dementia. A variety of metrics were implemented to evaluate the effort. Through this work, we endeavored to highlight key differences between our pilot initiative (which was a grassroots initiative), focusing largely on Twitter and YouTube, and the current science-media partnership. We also aimed to generate recommendations suitable for other social media campaigns related to health or aging.

Methods: Evidence-based information about pain in dementia was summarized into engaging content (eg, videos) tailored to the needs of various knowledge users (eg, health professionals, families, and policy makers). We disseminated information using Facebook (Meta Platforms), Twitter (X Corp), YouTube (Alphabet Inc), Instagram (Meta Platforms), and LinkedIn (LinkedIn Corp) and measured the success of the initiative over a 12-month period (2020 to 2021). The evaluation methods focused on web analytics and questionnaires related to social media content. Knowledge users' web responses about the initiative and semistructured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: During the course of the campaign, >700 posts were shared across all platforms. Web analytics showed that we drew >60,000 users from 82 countries to our resource website. Of the social media platforms used, Facebook was the most effective in reaching knowledge users (ie, over 1,300,000 users). Questionnaire responses from users were favorable; interview responses indicated that the information shared throughout the initiative increased awareness of the problem of pain in dementia and influenced respondent behavior.

Conclusions: In this investigation, we demonstrated success in directing knowledge users to a resource website with practical information that health professionals could use in patient care along with pain assessment and management information for caregivers and people living with dementia. The evaluation metrics suggested no considerable differences between our pilot campaign and broader initiative when accounting for the length of time of each initiative. The limitations of large-scale health campaigns were noted, and recommendations were outlined for other researchers aiming to leverage social media as a knowledge mobilization tool.

#SeePainMoreClearly 第二阶段痴呆症疼痛社交媒体活动:实施与评估研究。
背景:社交媒体平台在提高人们对痴呆症患者疼痛评估不足和治疗不力的认识方面非常有效:社交媒体平台能有效提高人们对痴呆症患者疼痛评估不足和治疗不力的认识:在试点活动取得成功后,我们希望在数字媒体合作伙伴的帮助下,将我们的痴呆症疼痛知识动员试点活动(即 #SeePainMoreClearly)推广到多个社交媒体平台。该倡议的目标是提高人们对痴呆症患者疼痛评估和管理所面临挑战的认识。我们采用了各种指标来评估这项工作。通过这项工作,我们努力突出我们的试点倡议(这是一项草根倡议)与当前科学媒体合作伙伴之间的主要区别,前者主要关注 Twitter 和 YouTube。我们还旨在为其他与健康或老龄化相关的社交媒体活动提出建议:方法:我们将有关痴呆症疼痛的循证信息总结为引人入胜的内容(如视频),以满足不同知识用户(如医疗专业人员、家庭和决策者)的需求。我们利用 Facebook(Meta Platforms)、Twitter(X Corp)、YouTube(Alphabet Inc)、Instagram(Meta Platforms)和 LinkedIn(LinkedIn Corp)传播信息,并在 12 个月内(2020 年至 2021 年)对该倡议的成功与否进行了评估。评估方法侧重于与社交媒体内容相关的网络分析和问卷调查。采用主题分析法对知识用户关于该活动的网络回复和半结构式访谈进行了分析:在活动期间,在所有平台上分享了超过 700 篇帖子。网络分析显示,我们的资源网站吸引了来自 82 个国家的超过 60,000 名用户。在所使用的社交媒体平台中,Facebook 的知识用户覆盖率最高(超过 130 万用户)。用户的问卷调查结果良好;访谈结果表明,在整个活动中分享的信息提高了人们对痴呆症疼痛问题的认识,并影响了受访者的行为:在这项调查中,我们成功地将知识用户引导到了一个资源网站,该网站提供了医疗专业人员在患者护理中可以使用的实用信息,以及为护理人员和痴呆症患者提供的疼痛评估和管理信息。评估指标表明,如果考虑到每项活动的持续时间,我们的试点活动与更广泛的活动之间并无显著差异。我们指出了大规模健康活动的局限性,并为其他旨在利用社交媒体作为知识动员工具的研究人员提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信